ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian way if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolph Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
**How might Harris’s warnings about Trump’s instability influence independent voters in the upcoming election?**
**Interview with Political Analyst on Recent Trump and Harris Comments**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. I’d like to discuss the recent comments made by former President Donald Trump, where he emphatically stated, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” This was in response to comments made by Vice President Kamala Harris, who suggested that Trump admires Hitler’s generals. What is your take on Trump’s response?
**Analyst:** Thank you for having me. Trump’s response is interesting because it reflects his defensive posture as the election nears. By distancing himself from such severe accusations, he aims to reassure his base and appeal to undecided voters who might be swayed by extreme rhetoric. His declaration seeks to frame the conversation in a more favorable light for himself right before a critical election.
**Interviewer:** Harris has labeled Trump as a significant danger, stating that he is “even more unstable and more unhinged” than before. Could this escalation in rhetoric impact voter sentiment?
**Analyst:** Absolutely. The language used by both Trump and Harris reflects the heightened stakes of this election. By emphasizing instability, Harris is trying to motivate voters who are concerned about authoritarian tendencies. However, such aggressive tactics can also backfire. Some voters may perceive it as fear-mongering. The challenge for both candidates is to balance their rhetoric to energize their bases while not alienating moderates.
**Interviewer:** Trump mentioned that there will be “no one there to stop it,” referencing the Supreme Court’s past rulings. What implications does this comment have on public perception of his potential presidency?
**Analyst:** This statement taps into a larger narrative about accountability and the judiciary. For Trump supporters, this could be interpreted as evidence of injustice against him. Conversely, for critics, it raises alarms about the possible implications of an unchecked Trump administration. It reinforces concerns about concentration of power, which could sway moderate voters against him.
**Interviewer:** With the election just days away, how do you see this back-and-forth impacting the final voter turnout?
**Analyst:** The next few days will be crucial. Engaging conversations, like the one between Harris and Trump, will indeed mobilize certain voter segments. Harris’s focus on warning about Trump could resonate with those against his rhetoric and actions. But it’s essential for Democrats to also present a compelling vision for the future, rather than just focusing on fear. Engaging voters on issues they care about will be vital for turnout.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights. It’s clear that the dynamics in these final days are critical, and how each candidate navigates these accusations will be telling.
**Analyst:** Indeed, it’s an intense and pivotal time in American politics. Thank you for having me.