Khawar Manika modified her lawyer within the Iddat Nikah case within the native courtroom of Islamabad, Salman Akram Raja submitted the USB of Khawar Manika’s interview and Mufti Saeed’s assertion, Decide Afzal Majuka made it clear to the events that earlier than June 27 To determine on suspension of sentence purposes, if not one of the events seem, I’ll determine following wanting on the report.
Further Periods Decide Afzal Majuka heard the appeals towards the sentence of former Prime Minister Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi within the Duran-i-Idt Nikah case.
Junior lawyer Aleem Shahzad stated that the principle lawyer on this case is on his manner, anticipate 10 extra minutes.
Bushra Bibi’s lawyer Usman Gul stated that Salman Akram Raja will give arguments on behalf of founder PTI Imran Khan, I’ll give arguments on behalf of Bushra Bibi, Salman Akram Raja will attain following a while.
The courtroom adjourned the listening to, following which founder PTI’s lawyer Salman Akram Raja, Bushra Bibi’s lawyer Usman Gill and Khawar Manika’s lawyer Zahid Asif appeared within the courtroom.
PTI leaders Aoon Abbas, Shandana Gulzar, Kanwal Shuzab are current within the courtroom room.
On this event, lawyer Khawar Manika requested that the listening to be adjourned, I will even submit the lawyer’s letter on the subsequent listening to. The decide remarked that the listening to of this case can’t be postponed. To finalize the arguments, you contact the consumer and ask for the facility of lawyer by means of WhatsApp.
Later, Decide Afzal Majuka requested the lawyer of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi to reply two questions. On this case, the sentence will not be quick, so let me assist the courtroom relating to the quick time period sentence. Two judgments of the Supreme Court docket. One in all them is in your favor and one is towards you, so which judgment will you comply with?
On this, Imran Khan’s lawyer Salman Akram Raja stated that there is no such thing as a judgment towards us. Decide Afzal Majuka stated that there’s a judgment towards him. However the courtroom will act, the scenario has modified following the constitutional modification of 1985.
Later, Bushra Bibi’s lawyer Usman Gul knowledgeable the courtroom that I’ve to go to Adiala Jail, if the listening to must be adjourned until Monday, then I’ll give arguments on Monday, as we speak Salman Akram Raja is giving his arguments.
On this, the decide remarked that it’s not potential to carry the listening to on Monday, he’ll maintain the listening to on Tuesday.
Lawyer Salman Akram Raja, presenting his arguments, stated that the choice given beneath the jurisdiction of the Shariat Court docket is the ultimate authority, the choices earlier than the institution of the Shariat Court docket can’t be referred to, it can’t be that Taqi Usmani has written the choice. Put it apart, there’s a rule in Islam to not pry into a girl’s private life, the girl’s assertion will likely be thought-regarding ultimate, following 39 days of Idda, we is not going to pry following that.
He additional stated that no duty was positioned on the girl within the determination of the Supreme Court docket, the Supreme Court docket put all of the blame on the prosecution that they didn’t take the assertion of the girl, the courtroom dismissed the case on the premise that 39 Days handed.
On this, Decide Afzal Majuka stated that the choice of the Supreme Court docket can’t be stated to be fallacious on behalf of this courtroom. Lawyer Imran Khan stated that the phrase `iddah was not used within the Muslim Household Legislation. After leaving, 90 days ought to move, on this case everybody believed that the divorce was carried out anyway, the idea of Eid is Shariah.
Lawyer Salman Akram Raja instructed that who’s doing the fraud? Who’re you doing with? There are two events, one in all which might be a fraud, Justice Afzal Majoka noticed.
Salman Akram Raja stated that 496B was abolished, there is no such thing as a query of punishment, even the cost was not laid in 496B, there have to be two witnesses in 496B who didn’t come ahead. Divorced, in response to us Bushra Bibi, Khawar Manika bought divorced in April 2017, Bushra Bibi went to her mom’s home following divorce, stayed there for 4 months, Bushra Bibi was not allowed to current her stand in the course of the trial. .
Imran Khan’s lawyer stated that your complete case relies on the occasion of marriage, even when there’s a violation of Part 7, even then a prison case can’t be filed. It’s potential to know when it occurred, in response to them it occurred on 14th November 2017 and we imagine that the divorce befell on April 2017. Let’s begin the story from 14th November for a second. ends as a result of the Chairman Union Council has not been notified, Part 7 of the Household Legislation has no point out of Iddat, the Supreme Court docket has terminated the 90-day marriage relationship, there is no such thing as a justification for discover, the courtroom has to have a look at the Islamic Shariat Iddat. What does it say regarding? The Fatwa of the reign of Emperor Alamgir has been made a part of the Sharia courtroom.
Lawyer Salman Akram Raja additional stated that it’s an uncommon scenario, the Supreme Court docket has given a course that the sentence ought to be suspended and the attraction ought to be determined, even when the allegations of the complainant are accepted, the case will not be proved. Proof was not introduced, two judgments proved that Sharia courtroom protects the rights of girls, Sharia doesn’t point out the interval of Idda, the girl doesn’t must show that her 3 durations have handed, the complainant as an alternative of the girl. has to show that 3 durations haven’t handed.
He stated that if a choice is to be taken on the central attraction, there is no such thing as a drawback even when the choice will not be taken on suspension of sentence. With a purpose to save the girl from dropping her inheritance following her demise, the courtroom determined to repair the interval of Idda as 90 days.
Salman Akram Raja Advocate argued that the aim of the legislation is to assist the girl, I wish to assist the attraction together with the suspension of the sentence, I do know that the courtroom has to determine on the attraction of the suspension of the sentence within the subsequent fifteen days.
Later, Salman Akram Raja submitted the copy of Mufti Saeed’s interview by means of USB to the courtroom.
The lawyer stated that Mufti Saeed admitted that he gave an interview to Geonews anchor Shahzeb Khanzada, the testimony started on February 1, and the trial courtroom gave its verdict on February 2.
Decide Afzal Majoka expressed shock and remarked that the choice was given in 2 days? The lawyer stated that we stood for 14, 14 hours for 2 days, the trial courtroom stated do all the pieces as we speak, the trial courtroom stated witnesses, arguments, do all the pieces as we speak, the decision must be pronounced, we stood in Adiala jail until 12 midnight, trial. The courtroom declared struggle that the choice must be pronounced on February 3.
Lawyer Salman Akram Raja stated that have you ever ever requested a lawyer to present arguments at 11 pm?
After that, Khawar Manika’s interview with anchor Shahzeb Khanzada on Geonews was performed within the courtroom.
Imran Khan’s lawyer Salman Akram Raja stated that Shahzeb Khanzada additionally used the phrase ex-wife within the interview, Khawar Manika additionally stated ex-wife. He’s a liar, he lied in courtroom
On this, the lawyer-complainant Zahid Asif Chaudhry stated that do not get private with Khawarmanika, Khawarmanika has not been confirmed to be a liar wherever.
Lawyer Imran Khan stated that Khawarmanika prayed to founder PTI within the interview and stated there was a religious connection, Khawarmanika remained silent for five years and 11 months earlier than submitting the criticism, Khawar Manika was arrested, spent 4 months in jail, November 14. got here out of jail on November 25, filed a criticism, we all know what occurs to individuals who go to Chile, I wish to deliver Mufti Saeed’s lies to the courtroom, for Mufti Saeed, I’ve lies. There isn’t any different well mannered phrase.
He stated that earlier than Khawarmanika, a citizen named Muhammad Hanif, who appeared someplace within the air, filed a criticism, Muhammad Hanif’s criticism had the identical witnesses as Khawarmanika’s criticism. Aun Chaudhry used to gather.
Salman Akram Raja argued that my coronary heart doesn’t imagine that I ought to name Mufti Saeed a scholar, can anybody suppose that mendacity might be instructed whereas standing within the courtroom? Mufti Saeed stated that it’s not recognized who had been the witnesses in the course of the second marriage, Mufti Saeed stated within the presence of Aun Chaudhry that it’s not recognized who was the witness, Mufti Saeed will not be reliable.
Anran Khan’s lawyer stated that Aun Chaudhry was awarded the ticket of a celebration referred to as Satwat in return.
Later, lawyer Salman Akram Raja learn the assertion of Khawar Manika’s worker and witness Muhammad Latif within the courtroom.
Decide Afzal Majuka inquired that when did Khawar Manika know that Bushra Bibi, the founding father of PTI, bought married? Lawyer Khawar Manika stated that I’ll inquire and inform the courtroom.
Salman Akram Raja stated that there is no such thing as a proof {that a} fraudulent marriage has been carried out. The decide remarked that the choice on the suspension of sentence software must be made earlier than June 27. Am preserving the case for June 25.
Later, the courtroom adjourned the listening to on the suspension of sentence attraction until June 25.
Background of the case
It ought to be famous that Khawar Manika, ex-husband of Bushra Bibi, appeared within the courtroom of Islamabad Civil Decide Qudrat on November 25, and filed a case towards Imran Khan and his spouse for Idda marriage and illicit relations, petition part 494. /34, filed beneath B-496 and different provisions.
It was said within the petition that I belong to the Manika household of Pakpattan, was married to Bushra Bibi in 1989, which was going easily and nicely till Imran Khan moved to Islamabad by means of Bushra Bibi’s sister-in-law. didn’t intervene in the course of the sit-in, the applicant, who resides within the United Arab Emirates and believes that he has robust ties with the Jewish foyer.
Khawar Manika had said that Chairman PTI entered the complainant’s home within the guise of Pari Muridi and began visiting the home often even in his absence. Is.
The petition additional said that with the passage of time, Imran Khan started to intrude into the marital life though he was warned and even kicked out of the home premises in an inappropriate method.
Khawar Manika had instructed within the software that at some point when he out of the blue went to his home, he noticed that Zulfi Bukhari was alone in his bed room, he additionally used to come back typically with Imran Khan.
He had said within the software that Bushra Bibi began going to Bani Gala with out my permission, though I attempted to forcefully cease him, harsh sentences had been additionally exchanged.
It was additional written that Bushra Bibi was in possession of varied cell phones and SIM playing cards, which got by Farah Gogi on the directions of Chairman PTI.
Khawar Manika took the stand within the petition that earlier than the so-called marriage, each of them had illicit relations with one another, a reality instructed to me by the worker Latif.
The petition additional said that efforts had been made to enhance the scenario for the sake of the household however all failed, and the complainant filed for divorce on November 14, 2017.
In keeping with Khawar Manika’s request, Bushra Bibi bought married to Imran Khan on 1st January 2018 throughout Eid, this marriage is prohibited and towards Islamic teachings.
It was additional written that following the actual fact of marriage throughout Iddat got here to mild, each of them remarried in February 2018 by means of Mufti Saeed, so it’s a critical offense beneath Part 496/496B of Pakistan Penal Code, each earlier than marriage. They’d escaped.
The petition demanded that Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi be summoned and punished severely beneath the structure and legislation.
On December 11, the native courtroom of Islamabad declared the unlawful marriage case filed by Khawar Manika towards Imran Khan and his spouse Bushra Bibi admissible.
#Iddat #Nikah #case #determine #pleas #suspension #sentence #June #Decide #Pakistan
2024-06-23 12:23:23
