The Lebanese Forces party accused Hezbollah of turning once morest the constitution and the state, and working to destroy the Lebanese Republic by obstructing the election of a new president for the country.
The party, led by Samir Geagea, said in a statement, “Those who turn once morest the constitution, state, and institutions accuse other forces of what they have been doing for decades in a desperate attempt to cover up their coup deed,” referring to the statements of Hezbollah leader Sheikh Nabil Qaouk that “there is a political party in Lebanon.” Its project is to overturn the structure, identity, equations, and internal and national balances.”
The party affirmed that “Hezbollah” is the most working team to destroy the Lebanese Republic from its foundations and strike all opportunities, proposals and agreements that seek to build the state, starting with its continuous coup once morest the Taef Accord while refusing to implement it by refusing to hand over its weapons.
The party said that “Hezbollah” is the one that worked the most to strike the Lebanese formula by targeting all the components that refuse to submit to its dictates and its confiscation of the political, sovereign, military and security decision, and its involvement in absurd wars without returning neither to the state nor to the Lebanese people.
He added that Hezbollah was the one who attacked the internal balances and turned its weapons inside, from the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri to the assassination of the journalist Luqman Selim, through its invasion of the capital, Beirut on May 7, 2008, and its seditious practices, threatening all who oppose it and betraying all who oppose it. .
The “Lebanese Forces” confirmed that “Hezbollah” is the one that paralyzed the state with the transformation of all the governments it controlled into an address for corruption, deals and brokering in order to obtain political cover for its illegal armed presence, and its indulgence in the practice of all crimes outside the framework of the state of smuggling, which it considers part of what is called He has a “resistance process”, leading to his creation of a financial system outside the framework of the Lebanese financial system.
The Lebanese party, led by Samir Geagea, said in its statement that “Hezbollah is the one that dropped all the foundations of the dialogue following it mocked the Lebanese by dragging them to the tables of lies to distract them with its folklore sessions and then turning once morest it following passing its infernal plans outside it, from its coup once morest the 2006 dialogues in transforming it The promising summer turned into flames, and 2008 following its invasion of Beirut and the mountain, and 2012 following its repudiation of the Baabda Agreement, and other sessions of national hypocrisy.
And the “Lebanese Forces” considered that “Hezbollah” made the agreement a Lebanese heresy whose sole title is “You agree on what I have decided, or there is no life, bliss, or stability for you and your country, whose diverse identity I reject.” He expressed the Lebanese Forces party’s rejection of this equation, which he described as “killing the dreams of the Lebanese.”
The “Lebanese Forces” party affirmed that in light of Hezbollah’s continued hijacking of the sovereign decision and its insistence on implanting a tool belonging to it directly or evasively in the presidential chair, it will not back down from its movement in communicating with the Lebanese who refuse to remain as death projects in a regional project, in order to Reaching a rescue formula that will restore the state from Hezbollah.
The Lebanese parliament failed, through 11 sessions, to elect a new president for the country, to succeed Michel Aoun, whose term expired on October 31.
Since the last session last Thursday, which ended without result, a number of Lebanese deputies have been sit-in inside the parliament headquarters to demand the holding of open sessions that will not end except with the election of a new president for the country.
The 11th session to elect a new president for the country resulted in the failure to reach a consensus on a new president for the country, as it was attended by 110 deputies, including 37 deputies who voted with a white paper, and candidate Michel Moawad got 34 votes, and 29 deputies nullified their votes, and other candidates got regarding 10 votes. .
