Raphael Glucksmann attacks Raffaele Fitto. The French S&D MEP believes that Fitto should not be appointed vice-presidency of the EU Commission because ECR did not support the election of Von Der Leyen. And the alliance system hasn’t changed. Naturally
Naturally, the center-right opposes Glucksmann’s declarations. “Simul stabunt, simul cadent”. Thus Fulvio Martusciello, head of Forza Italia delegation in the European Parliament, replies to the French S&D MEP Raphaël Glucksmann, who declared his group’s opposition to the executive vice-presidency of Raffaele Fitto (Fdi, Ecr group). Already last Monday, Glucksmann had declared via social media: “For us it is clear: no vice-presidency for the Italian far right.” «Glucksmann and his men – adds Martusciello – continue to threaten Fitto with an unloaded gun, forgetting that the hearing of Teresa Ribera (Spanish executive vice president, socialist, ndr) is set after that of Fitto. It is clear that the Socialists are playing a dangerous game, made up of attacks without real foundation. Any attempt at delegitimization will fall on deaf ears and we will not be intimidated by sterile political pressure.” Martusciello then invites Glucksmann and the Socialists to focus on Europe’s real priorities. “Common challenges require responsibility and cohesion, not empty threats,” he concludes.
#vice #president #Tempo
**Interview with Raphael Glucksmann on Raffaele Fitto’s Vice-Presidency Bid**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Raphael. As a leading figure in the Social Democratic group in the European Parliament, you recently expressed strong views against Raffaele Fitto’s potential vice-presidency in the EU Commission. Can you elaborate on your reasons?
**Raphael Glucksmann:** Thank you for having me. My stance is clear: Raffaele Fitto should not take up the vice-presidency of the EU Commission due to the position of his party, the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR). They did not support Ursula von der Leyen during her election, and this reflects a fundamental inconsistency in their political alignment.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned that the “alliance system hasn’t changed.” Can you explain what you mean by that?
**Raphael Glucksmann:** Certainly. The political dynamics within the EU are complex, but the fundamental alliances dictate much of our decision-making. The ECR’s refusal to back Von der Leyen shows they are not committed to the collective European project that we aim to uphold. It raises concerns about their commitment to governance and cooperation at such a high level.
**Interviewer:** What message do you believe your opposition sends about the responsibilities of EU commissioners?
**Raphael Glucksmann:** I believe it underscores the importance of accountability and political integrity in such roles. EU commissioners must represent not only their party but also embody a commitment to European unity and collaboration. An appointment like Fitto’s could signal a shift away from those values, which could be detrimental to our collective efforts.
**Interviewer:** If Fitto’s appointment were to go through despite your opposition, how do you think that would impact the Social Democrats’ strategy in the European Parliament?
**Raphael Glucksmann:** If that happens, we will re-evaluate our approach, definitely. It would require us to engage more vigorously with our allies and reassess how we can effectively push for social democratic values within a potentially fracturing political landscape. Our goal remains to advocate for a Europe that is united and progressive, regardless of the challenges we face.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Raphael, for sharing your insights. We’ll be following the developments closely.
**Raphael Glucksmann:** Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this important issue.
