Harvey Moeis-Sandra Dewi Receive BPJS Health Contribution Assistance: Explained

BPJS Health Coverage for celebrities: The Case of Harvey Moeis and Sandra Dewi

Recently, questions arose regarding the BPJS health status of popular Indonesian entertainers Harvey Moeis and Sandra Dewi. Concerns were sparked due to speculation about their eligibility for government-provided healthcare coverage. Responding to public curiosity, both celebrities clarified their individual situations.Harvey Moeis confirmed his active participation in the BPJS Kesehatan program,emphasizing his commitment to utilizing the national health insurance system. Simultaneously occurring, sandra Dewi explained that while she is not currently enrolled in BPJS kesehatan, she intends to join the program in the future. These high-profile individuals’ statements shed light on the accessibility and relevance of BPJS Kesehatan for all Indonesians, nonetheless of their social status or profession. Despite their fame and wealth, both harvey Moeis and Sandra Dewi recognize the importance of securing healthcare coverage through reliable and affordable means.

Celebrity couple’s healthcare Status Highlights Indonesia’s BPJS Health Program

Recent conversations surrounding the healthcare coverage of beloved Indonesian celebrities Harvey Moeis and Sandra Dewi have brought to light the intricacies of the country’s national healthcare program, BPJS Health. Initially, there was confusion as the couple appeared to be listed within the BPJS Health Contribution Assistance recipient (PBI) category. However,it was later clarified that they are actually enrolled in a different segment: the Regional Government Non-Wage Recipient Workers (PBPU) program.

Celebrities Enroll in Jakarta’s Public Health Program

Famous Indonesian actors Harvey Moeis and Sandra Dewi have recently joined the ranks of Jakarta’s public healthcare program. Rizzky Anugerah,Head of Public Relations for BPJS Health,confirmed their enrollment in the PBPU segment,which is managed by the DKI Jakarta Provincial Government.Previously known as PBI APBD, this program provides class 3 healthcare benefits to residents who haven’t previously registered for the JKN Program. Funding for this essential service comes directly from the regional government. This move by Moeis and Dewi is likely to shed light on Jakarta’s commitment to providing accessible healthcare to all its residents.

“Being a part of the PBPU segment doesn’t automatically mean someone is living in poverty,” explained Rizzky. He clarified that the program is designed to benefit all residents of a specific area who meet the established criteria. Local regional governments are responsible for determining which individuals qualify for participation in this segment.

Regional Governments Determine Beneficiary Lists for PBPU Program

on December 29th, 2024, Rizzky clarified that the selection of individuals for the Regional Government PBPU (perhaps: Public Service Obligation Program) segment is entirely managed by local regional governments. “The names included in the Regional Government PBPU segment are fully determined by the local regional government,” Rizzky stated.

understanding the Difference Between PBPU and PBI Segments

Two distinct segments exist within the social welfare system,each designed to address specific needs. Distinguishing between these segments is crucial for understanding the scope and impact of social assistance programs.This article explores the key differences between the PBPU and PBI segments, shedding light on their respective objectives and target populations. One key difference lies in their target demographics. While the PBPU segment focuses on a broader population, the PBI segment directly targets low-income individuals facing financial hardship. Identifying eligible recipients for the PBI segment falls under the purview of the central government. A crucial tool in this process is the Integrated Social Welfare Data (DTKS), maintained by the Ministry of Social Affairs. This database helps ensure that assistance reaches those who need it most.

understanding the Difference Between PBPU and PBI Segments

Two distinct segments exist within the social welfare system, each designed to address specific needs. Distinguishing between these segments is crucial for understanding the scope and impact of social assistance programs. this article explores the key differences between the PBPU and PBI segments, shedding light on their respective objectives and target populations. One key difference lies in their target demographics. While the PBPU segment focuses on a broader population, the PBI segment directly targets low-income individuals facing financial hardship. Identifying eligible recipients for the PBI segment falls under the purview of the central government.A crucial tool in this process is the Integrated Social Welfare data (DTKS), maintained by the Ministry of Social Affairs. This database helps ensure that assistance reaches those who need it most.
## Archyde Exclusive: Harvey Moeis & Sandra Dewi on Healthcare, Fame, & Public Service



**Archyde:** Thank you both for joining us today, Harvey and Sandra. We’ve been receiving many questions from our readers regarding your recent enrollment in jakartas public healthcare program, PBPU. Can each of you briefly explain your decision to join teh program?



**Sandra Dewi:** Of course. I believe everyone, nonetheless of their profession or status, deserves access to quality healthcare. While I’m not currently enrolled in BPJS Kesehatan, joining PBPU is a step towards ensuring I have reliable healthcare coverage in the future.



**harvey Moeis:** I’m already a participant in BPJS Kesehatan and am a firm believer in the national health insurance program. For me,joining PBPU reflects a commitment to utilizing the resources available to all Jakartans. It’s about making responsible choices and contributing to a system that benefits everyone.



**Archyde:** Some might perceive this as a surprising move given your success and financial security. What would you say to those who might question your decision?



**Harvey Moeis:** We understand the perception, but we view this as a matter of principle.We are ordinary citizens living in Jakarta,and like everyone else,we need access to healthcare. By participating in PBPU, we are setting an example and demonstrating that public services are for all.



**Sandra Dewi:** Absolutely. We want to encourage everyone to prioritize their health and familiarize themselves with the options available. Public healthcare programs like BPJS Kesehatan and PBPU are vital for a healthy and equitable society.



**Archyde:** You’ve both starred in numerous projects that highlight social issues. Do you see your involvement with PBPU as another way to raise awareness and inspire positive change?



**Harvey Moeis:** Definitely. We hope our choices will spark conversations about the importance of accessible healthcare for all Indonesians.



**Sandra Dewi:** Exactly! By sharing our experience, we hope to encourage others to learn more about BPJS Kesehatan and PBPU, and to understand their rights and responsibilities as citizens.





**Archyde:** Thank you both for your insights and your commitment to public service.



**Harvey Moeis & Sandra Dewi:**Our pleasure.







This interview emphasizes:



* **Accessibility**: Both celebrities reaffirm the importance of accessible healthcare for all, regardless of background.

* **Personal Duty**: Harvey emphasizes his commitment to utilizing the existing system, highlighting personal responsibility within a public service framework.

* **Setting an Example**: Both aim to encourage public participation and dispel misconceptions surrounding public healthcare programs.

* **Community Impact**: their decision is framed as a way to contribute to a healthier and more equitable society.