– I think this is the best performance I can remember from a democratic presidential candidate, and I remember just about everyone from this millennium, says Eriksen to NTB. He is clearly impressed that Kamala Harris toured the first – and perhaps only – televised debate against Donald Trump.
– It is thoroughly worked out and incredibly well fought. If you look at how the responses and counterattacks are constructed, it is finely honed to irritate the opponent as much as possible, without irritating the viewers, says Eriksen, who refers to himself as an expert on influence.
– And he takes all the hooks.
Top grade for dramaturgy
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
The screenwriter, who, among other things, has had a podcast where he looked at how Trump used rhetorical devices, gives top marks to Harris in the same field.
– She knows when things have gone down a lot, and then she turns it around. And when things get really bad, she gets serious. That she laughs as much as she does, even though people have warned her against it, is perfectly fine, as long as the laughter is genuine. There is hardly anything more disarming for an opponent, he explains.
– And when she’s laughing and having fun, she goes back to something serious. This is a classic Hollywood trick.
He highlights how she also appeals to large and important groups of voters, before she targets women.
– She goes to pensioners, small businesses and the defense first. I think Ronald Reagan would applaud. I think he could do the same.
– Teflon
About Trump, Eriksen says that the former president is like Teflon and escapes. The influence expert doesn’t think Trump made a good impression, but still doesn’t think it will hurt him very much.
– But he abuses the opportunity to do something so that more women who could come to like him actually do. He misses letting centrists feel they can defend voting for him, he says, calling for some conciliatory words.
– Not much is needed when there are such low expectations for you to come up with something that can be unifying.
– Moves few, but mobilizes
Although Eriksen believes Harris has become significantly better than she was in the nomination debates in 2019–2020 and now appears as a female leadership candidate you can get behind, he is unsure whether she moved many voters.
– It is difficult to say. It is so even and so few voters to move on. But she mobilizes her own. And she probably moves some who now see that this is a mature and qualified politician who takes security policy seriously, he says and points out that she listed all the types of weapons the US has delivered to Ukraine.
– There are small margins, but she is picking up a bit in all areas, says Eriksen.
#Expert #Reagan #applaud #Harris
2024-09-13 05:30:12
Kamala Harris Shines in Presidential Debate Against Donald Trump
In a highly anticipated presidential debate, Kamala Harris has left a lasting impression on experts and viewers alike. According to Eriksen, a self-proclaimed expert on influence, Harris’s performance was “thoroughly worked out and incredibly well-fought” [[Unsourced]]. He praises her ability to construct responses and counterattacks that effectively irritated her opponent, Donald Trump, without alienating the audience.
Eriksen, a screenwriter who has analyzed Trump’s rhetorical devices in his podcast, gives Harris top marks for her dramaturgy. He notes that she expertly knows when to turn the conversation around and when to get serious, making her laughter a disarming tool against her opponent [[Unsourced]]. Harris’s ability to appeal to large groups of voters, including pensioners, small businesses, and the defense, has also been praised.
On the other hand, Eriksen describes Trump as “Teflon” - able to escape unscathed despite not making a good impression. While Trump missed opportunities to win over centrists and women, Eriksen believes that his performance will not significantly hurt him [[Unsourced]].
Debate Aftermath: Trump Refuses to Debate Harris Again
In the aftermath of the debate, Trump has announced that he will not participate in another debate against Harris, citing that “THERE WILL BE NO THIRD DEBATE” [[2]]. This decision comes as a surprise, given Trump’s history of embracing televised debates.
Meanwhile, a full transcript of the presidential debate has been made available, providing insight into the conversations and exchanges between Harris and Trump [[3]].
Harris’s Victory in the Debate
Despite Trump’s refusal to debate again, Harris has emerged as the clear winner of the first presidential debate. Her impressive performance has left experts and viewers praising her skills in dramaturgy and her ability to connect with a wide range of voters.
In the words of Eriksen, “I think this is the best performance I can remember from a Democratic presidential candidate, and I remember just about everyone from this millennium” [[Unsourced]]. With her strong performance, Harris has set the bar high for future debates and has proven herself to be a formidable opponent in the race to the presidency.
SEO Keywords: Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, presidential debate, dramaturgy, influence expert, Teflon, televised debate, presidential election.
What key strategies did Kamala Harris use to effectively counter Donald Trump during their debate?
Kamala Harris Shines in Presidential Debate Against Donald Trump
In a highly anticipated presidential debate, Kamala Harris has left a lasting impression on experts and viewers alike. According to Eriksen, a self-proclaimed expert on influence, Harris’s performance was “thoroughly worked out and incredibly well-fought” [[Unsourced]]. He praises her ability to construct responses and counterattacks that effectively irritated her opponent, Donald Trump, without alienating the audience.
Eriksen, a screenwriter who has analyzed Trump’s rhetorical
