After a campaign stop in North Carolina, the vice president’s plane was apparently headed for Detroit, but as soon as the plane was airborne, her advisers said Harris was actually headed to New York.
There she appeared in the popular entertainment program “Saturday Night Live”, reports Reuters. This week’s episode is the last before Election Day next Tuesday, and it’s Harris’ first time as a guest.
The vice president appeared in a skit alongside SNL actress Maya Rudolph, who has portrayed Harris numerous times since 2019. Rudolph’s parody has been well received by audiences and critics — and by Harris herself.
– Maya Rudolph – well, she’s good. She had the whole thing in place, the suit, the jewelry, everything, Harris said when she guested on ABC’s “The View” last month.
Donald Trump’s adviser Jason Miller says he is surprised that Harris will appear on “Saturday Night Live”, because he believes the program portrays her unflatteringly. When asked if Trump has been asked to be on SNL, Miller replies that he does not know, but that the former president is “probably not” invited.
There is a long tradition of politicians appearing as guests on the popular programme. Trump took part in 2015, and Hillary Clinton took part in both 2008 when she ran against Barack Obama in the Democratic nomination and in 2016, when she was Trump’s opponent in the presidential election.
#Harris #participated #shows #York
**Interview with Political Analyst Sarah Thompson on Kamala Harris’ SNL Appearance**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Sarah. Let’s dive into the recent controversy surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris’ appearance on “Saturday Night Live.” Some believe it was a strategic move to connect with younger voters right before the elections. What are your thoughts?
**Sarah Thompson:** Thanks for having me! I think Harris’ decision to appear on SNL is definitely a calculated move, especially with Election Day looming. It’s all about visibility and relatability, and being on a platform like SNL can appeal to a demographic that might not engage with traditional political media.
**Editor:** That’s an interesting perspective. However, the FCC has raised concerns that this might violate the Equal Time rule. Do you think that the perception of her use of entertainment media could overshadow the potential benefits?
**Sarah Thompson:** Absolutely, these rules are crucial to maintaining fairness in political campaigning. If the FCC finds merit in their argument, it could spark a larger debate about how politicians should engage with entertainment, and whether they are circumventing rules designed to ensure equal representation.
**Editor:** Given the history of politicians participating in SNL, do you believe this appearance adheres to that tradition, or does it push the boundaries?
**Sarah Thompson:** There is a long-standing tradition of politicians using comedy to humanize themselves. However, the stakes are higher now with digital platforms and the polarized climate in politics. This could either solidify Harris’ image or backfire depending on public reception.
**Editor:** With reactions varying across the political spectrum, how do you foresee this impacting voter sentiment, particularly among those who may already have mixed feelings about her?
**Sarah Thompson:** It’s a double-edged sword. While some may appreciate her humor and relatability, others might view it as an inappropriate distraction from the serious issues at hand. This could lead to heated discussions about the role of entertainment in politics—does it dilute the seriousness of governance or enhance connection?
**Editor:** Very thought-provoking, Sarah. To our readers, do you think Kamala Harris’ appearance on SNL was an effective move to connect with voters or a risky step that could undermine her political credibility? We would love to hear your thoughts!