:quality(70)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/liberation/MTB7H63KIVH7BAEN2G4243G6OI.jpg?fit=%2C&ssl=1)
Sign up to receive free our Libélympique newsletter every morning during the Games.
A dramatic turn of events has occurred at the Olympic Games. Jordan Chiles of the United States lost the bronze medal she won in the floor gymnastics event on August 5, with Romanian Ana Barbosu now taking home the medal. On Saturday, August 10, Barbosu won her case with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), which determined that the American team’s appeal to upgrade Chiles’ score was not in line with the rules. The appeal was submitted… four seconds late!
Initially, on Monday, August 5, during the floor gymnastics event, Ana Barbosu was announced as the third place winner and she even waved the Romanian flag in Arena Bercy. However, a few minutes later, she was moved down to fourth place. The judges reassessed Jordan Chiles’ score, adding a tenth of a point to her technical score (increasing it from 5.8 to 5.9 points) for a total of 13.766 points. Chiles then climbed from fifth to third place.
On Saturday, August 10, the Court ruled that the appeal was not valid as it reached the jury “one minute and four seconds” after her score was announced, while the rules stipulate a time limit of one minute. Thus, the highest authority in the sports world reinstated the American’s initial score of 13.666. With her score of 13.700, Ana Barbosu ascended a rank, receiving the bronze medal.
“It’s a feeling that I can hardly express, I can’t believe it,” Barbosu said, as quoted by Romanian media. “When I heard the news, I was afraid it wasn’t true, and once I confirmed it, I hugged my parents and called everyone who had supported me.”
Her fellow countrywoman Sabrina Voinea (who also scored 13.700 but with a lower execution score, placing her in fifth position) contested her penalty of -0.1 to return to the podium. Her appeal was rejected.
The U.S. Olympic Committee released a statement on Saturday evening: “We are devastated by the CAS decision regarding the floor event. Our request […] was submitted in good faith and, in our view, in accordance with FIG regulations to ensure an accurate score.” The committee also condemned the wave of cyberbullying that Chiles has faced since the floor event. “No athlete should have to endure such treatment.”
Following the event on Monday, August 5, the two Americans, Simone Biles (silver medalist) and Jordan Chiles, paid tribute to the gold medalist, Brazilian Rebecca Andrade, creating one of the standout images of these Olympic Games: three black women on a podium that has historically featured predominantly white athletes. A photograph that will be remembered.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport Rule Change: Jordan Chiles’ Bronze Medal Stripped, Ana Barbosu Awarded Bronze
Sport regarding Jordan Chiles' gymnastics bronze medal, now awarded to Romania's Ana Barbosu. Explore the implications of this decision." />
In a dramatic turn of events that surprised many at the Olympic Games, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ruled on Saturday, August 10, that the American protest that had allowed gymnast Jordan Chiles to initially claim the bronze medal in the floor exercise was invalid. This ruling has resulted in Romanian gymnast Ana Barbosu being awarded the bronze medal instead. Below, we dive into the specifics of this case, the implications of the ruling, and the reactions from those involved.
Background of the Controversy
The gymnastics floor event took place on August 5, where the initial standings placed Barbosu in third place, allowing her to celebrate with her team and wave the Romanian flag. However, shortly after the event, the International Gymnastics Federation (FIG) reevaluated Chiles’ score, boosting her technical score from 5.8 to 5.9, resulting in a total score of 13.766. This adjustment propelled Chiles from fifth to third place, demoting Barbosu to fourth.
- Jordan Chiles’ original score: 13.666
- Adjusted score after FIG review: 13.766
- Ana Barbosu’s score: 13.700
Details of the CAS Ruling
The CAS ruling determined that the appeal made by the American gymnastics team was submitted too late. Specifically, the appeal was received “one minute and four seconds” after the judges had announced Chiles’ final score, exceeding the one-minute limit set by FIG regulations. This finding reinstated Chiles’ initial score of 13.666 and confirmed Barbosu’s rightful placement on the podium.
| Gymnast | Initial Score | Final Score after Review | Final Placement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Chiles | 13.666 | 13.766 | Originally 3rd, now 4th |
| Ana Barbosu | 13.700 | 13.700 | 3rd |
| Sabrina Voinea | 13.700 | Lower Execution Score | 5th |
Reactions from the Athletes and Officials
Ana Barbosu expressed her disbelief and joy upon receiving the news of her medal reinstatement, stating, “It’s a feeling I can barely express, I can’t believe it. When I heard the news, I was afraid it wasn’t true.” This victory not only marks a significant achievement for Barbosu but also for Romanian gymnastics.
On the other side, the U.S. Olympic Committee issued a statement expressing their devastation about the CAS decision. They stated, “We are devastated by the CAS decision regarding the ground test. Our request was filed in good faith and, in our opinion, in accordance with FIG regulations to ensure a correct score.” The committee has likewise condemned the cyberbullying that Chiles faced after the events unfolded, emphasizing that no athlete should endure such treatment.
The Broader Implications of the Ruling
This ruling carries weight beyond just the individual accolades of Chiles and Barbosu. It serves as a reminder of the rigorous standards of conduct and the importance of adhering to the established timelines in competitive sports. The involvement of the CAS underlines the significance of formal and timely appeals in the world of athletics, particularly in high-stakes events like the Olympics.
Key Takeaways from the Incident
- Timeliness matters: This case emphasizes the importance of responding swiftly within set guidelines.
- Impact on athletes: The emotional toll on athletes navigating such disputes is significant and often overlooked.
- Respect for regulations: Upholding and respecting sporting regulations is vital to ensuring fairness in competition.
Conclusion
While the CAS ruling will inevitably spark debates around fairness and procedural integrity within the gymnastics community, it ultimately underscores the principles of sportsmanship and respect inherent in competitive sports. As the Olympic Games continue to captivate audiences worldwide, this incident serves as a critical reminder of the complexities and the emotional rollercoaster that athletes often face. Whether it is joy or despair, the spirit of competition remains at the heart of athletic endeavors, pushing participants to strive for excellence against all odds.
For more updates like these, don’t forget to sign up for our Libélympique newsletter and stay informed every morning during the Games.
