Two Books Removed From Oregon High School Library After Community Challenge
Two books have been removed from the shelves of Grants Pass High School following a review process initiated by concerned community members. The removal of All Boys Aren’t Blue and Lucky ignited a larger conversation about censorship and the role of school boards in selecting educational materials.
Challenging Books and the Review Process
Two residents, who do not have children in the district and admitted to not reading the books they challenged, sparked a formal review process. Following established procedures, the district formed a 12-member committee to assess the challenged books, along with two others that had also drawn concern from community members.
The committee, composed of staff, teachers, administrators, parents, and the librarian. After carefully reviewing and discussing all four books, the committee bypassed the recommendation process. Those who dared to disagree with the committee’s decision should launch a formal appeal. The books went immediately. The district declined to provide specific reasons for the removal, simply stating that each committee member had the opportunity to discuss each book and share their thoughts in a secretive fashion.
Distribution of the removed books data at the Grants Pass High School library revealed that All Boys Aren’t Blue had been checked out six times since its purchase, while Lucky had been checked out 37 times.
Renewed Focus on Book Bans and Censorship Concerns
The controversy surrounding these book removals has coincided with the school board’s ongoing efforts to revise its policy on instructional and library materials. This project comes against a backdrop of growing tensions over the appropriateness of certain books and the potential for censorship.
This incident highlights a growing concern within the community and across the nation regarding the influence of school boards in determining what materials should be accessible to students. Critics argue that such policies,
similar to the voiceless, are attempting to push a particular narrative.
Past Controversies and First Amendment Rights
This particular incident evokes memories of a past controversy within the district. In 2021, two employees were terminated by the board after they released
a video titled “I Resolve Movement: Response to Gender Identity Policies.”
In this, they discussed a series of propositions relating to transgender students’ pronouns. The district claimed to have received nearly.
The two teachers
challenged in a decision.
in federal court, claiming their rights were violated, the accommodations
While the Rosen
scrapbooking the
**Distribution
The district reaffirmed its commitment to providing a variety of viewpoints and promoting intellectual freedom, emphasizing the importance of a collaborative and
redistribution
the
