The government pushed through the changes in the work execution agreements despite long-term criticism and warnings from experts and entrepreneurs. After a year of sudden changes and figuring out how and which group of contract holders should actually be better controlled and taxed, he suddenly gives up on the new system. Again, the last adjustment is due to end before it takes effect, and the agreements will practically return to the state before the consolidation package took effect. After a decade, the upper limit for the payment of health and social insurance is to be increased by at least a few hundred crowns. Their mandatory registration, which came into effect this summer, remains valid.
The change was “hidden” in the amendment to the Employment Act. At the suggestion of Labor Minister Marian Jurečka (KDU-ČSL), the lower house canceled the regime of the so-called notified agreement, which was supposed to be introduced by the consolidation package from next year. For entrepreneurs, initially easy and flexible jobs have become a bit of a nightmare in the last year. First came the complex amendments in the amendment to the Labor Code, followed by the changes introduced by the consolidation package. During this process, the Minister of Finance Zbyněk Stanjura (ODS) already started talking about the need for changes, and shortly after, the Minister of Labor Jurečka also decided to postpone the effectiveness of some changes. So that the ministry finally comes up with the fact that the postponed changes will be canceled and changed, quickly, before the end of the year.
Through changes in work performance agreements, the government has made flexible working hours more expensive for both employees and employers. Employers began to cancel these obligations en masse and demand other forms of cooperation, often less advantageous for both parties. Entrepreneurs, for whom sudden changes meant additional costs and lost time, warned against everything from the beginning.
“A new generation is coming that doesn’t understand Europe,” says a former American diplomat
Ondřej Šmigol, November 22, 2024
INTERVIEW
What ultimately led to the change? The registration of work agreements introduced by the government has shown that the government’s arguments for tougher taxation of contract workers are wrong. From the new year, a regime was supposed to apply that would allow only one “notified” employer to reach the limit for insurance premiums, while all other agreements would be subject to tougher taxation. This was supposed to prevent the alleged chaining of flexible agreements across multiple employers on a large scale, but the data showed that this was a very marginal problem.
“However, from the preliminary data for the first two months, it can be concluded that the first adjustment applied in this way would not significantly change the volume of wage payment without insurance premium payments. The legislation (…) would fulfill the set goals only marginally, and considering how big a change this legislation would mean in the procedures of employers, but also of administrative authorities, it seems more appropriate to cancel it at the moment and wait for statistical data from records of the DPP for a longer period of time,” reads the amendment proposed by Minister Jurečka.
Peter Fiala’s Red Castle. How will the Czechs fare?
Echo24, 21 November 2024
PODCAST ECHO MEETING
The “automatic machine” for raising the limit for earnings without taxes, which has remained at 10 thousand crowns for a decade, is to be retained. Although employer representatives have been calling for an increase in the limit to at least 15,000 crowns after such a long time, the limit is supposed to automatically depend on the limit of 25% of the average wage. In 2025, according to the explanatory report, this will mean an increase to 11,500 crowns.
“The approximate estimate of the impact of this amendment on the state budget is a shortfall in income from insurance premiums for social security and the contribution to the state employment policy at the level of around 2 billion. CZK per year. Of this, increasing the limit for participation in health insurance above CZK 10,000 would mean a loss of income from insurance premiums estimated to be in the lower hundreds of millions. CZK,” adds the reasoned report.
The new populism of Petr Fiala! Salaries like in Germany in four years?
Echo24, 21 November 2024
PODCAST ECHO MEETING
The chairwoman of the ANO deputies, Alena Schillerová, stated that the changes in the agreements were from the beginning “devastating for companies, liquidating hundreds of thousands of contract holders and increased illegal employment”, which experts and the opposition warned the government against. After a year, the cabinet found that the system of registration and taxation of agreements is impractical, she said.
Ah, the government and its ever-so-complex relationship with work execution agreements! It’s like watching a soap opera, except instead of emotional breakdowns, we get bureaucratic breakdowns. The only thing missing is the dramatic music…and maybe a few angry shouting matches in a cornfield.
So, here we are—after a year of frantically waving our hands in the air like we’ve got an invisible hula hoop on our waist, the government finally throws in the towel over work agreements. Can you imagine the scene? It’s like a game of musical chairs, but instead of chairs, we’re dealing with health insurance payments and tax obligations.
The amendments to the Employment Act were sneaky, like a cat burglar at a birthday party. They rolled in through the back door and suddenly, what was meant to be a simple adjustment for contract workers turned into a bureaucratic nightmare. Surprise! The complexities made it harder for entrepreneurs to breathe—forget about easy and flexible, we ended up with convoluted and chaotic. Honestly, it felt like trying to put up a tent during a windstorm—only to find out you’ve pitched it upside down.
The Labor Minister, Marian Jurečka, must have felt quite like an illusionist during all this. “Look over here, folks! A new notified agreement! Ta-da!” But then the government quickly realized the card trick hadn’t worked. Cue the record scratch; the audience gasps, and we all look at each other, asking, “Wait, what just happened?”
With this new regime aimed at targeting that pesky “chaining” of flexible agreements (which turned out to be a problem as big as a flea on a mastodon), the government’s best-laid plans crumbled faster than a cheap set of tea cups. A couple of months’ worth of data came back, and it was like getting your math test results back from your teacher after using the calculator to cheat. “Oops,” they said, “this isn’t as effective as we thought!” We were left with a masterpiece of confusion, proving the only thing more bewildering than tax laws is, well, tax laws wrapped in tax laws.
Let’s also take a moment to honor the upper limit for health and social insurance—the good ol’ 10,000 crowns, which is about as useful as a chocolate teapot in a sauna. Some in the business world were shouting for a decent increase; they wanted something close to the average wage! But alas, the government scrapes by with a pathetic little bump up to 11,500 crowns in 2025, which they’ve decided is enough to keep the masses satisfied. “Revolutionary,” they say! More like “Oh, look, a quarter in a wishing well—still not gonna pay for my lunch!”
So, where does this leave us? Well, you have to hand it to the government—they’ve managed to create a system so muddled that even experienced businesspeople are now left wrestling with changes, trying to fight off the chaos like it’s an overzealous chia pet. With the changes drawing to a close before they’ve properly closed, all that’s left is for entrepreneurs to dust themselves off, shake their heads, and think, “Maybe we should just all become professional cat herders instead.”
In the end, government officials might as well have been listening to a pop song on repeat while planning these adjustments—“Oops, we did it again!”—because when all’s said and done, it seems they may have just given up the ghost on the very system intended to streamline our work lives. Who knew that getting a quick, flexible job could be approached as if you were trying to solve the Rubik’s cube blindfolded?
Well, keep your ear to the ground because this bureaucratic rollercoaster may not be done yet. And just remember, if things get confusing, at least you’re not alone. We’re all just here trying to find the best seat on this dodgy ride together!
Despite longstanding criticism and stark warnings from industry experts and entrepreneurs alike, the government has pushed through significant changes to work execution agreements. After a year marked by sudden legislative shifts and confusion over which categories of contract holders required stricter controls and taxation, the government has now abruptly abandoned its new system. Unfortunately, the latest adjustments are set to expire before taking effect, effectively reverting the agreements to their pre-consolidation package conditions. Notably, after a decade of stagnation, the upper limit for health and social insurance contributions is slated to rise by several hundred crowns, while the mandatory registration requirement that began this summer will remain in force.
The decision to reverse course was covertly integrated into an amendment to the Employment Act. Following a proposal by Labor Minister Marian Jurečka (KDU-ČSL), the lower house has annulled the introduction of a new regime of so-called notified agreements, which was slated for implementation next year. What had initially appeared to be a straightforward and flexible arrangement for entrepreneurs has morphed into a complex predicament over the past year, as intricate modifications to the Labor Code were introduced alongside the consolidation package reforms. As the Minister of Finance Zbyněk Stanjura (ODS) began to vocalize concerns regarding necessary changes, Minister Jurečka also opted to delay the enactment of several proposed amendments. Ultimately, the ministry has made a swift decision to cancel and alter these postponed changes before the end of the year.
Through the alterations to work performance agreements, the government has inadvertently escalated the cost of flexible working hours for both employees and employers. Consequently, many employers have begun to terminate these obligations en masse, opting instead for alternative arrangements that often prove less advantageous for all involved. Entrepreneurs, who faced additional costs and lost productivity due to these abrupt regulatory changes, have been voicing their concerns from the very start.
The registration of work agreements initiated by the government has exposed significant flaws in its rationale for imposing stricter taxation on contract workers. The government had previously intended to enforce a regime whereby only one “notified” employer could meet the limit for insurance premiums, with all other agreements subjected to heightened taxation. This measure was aimed at curbing the perceived issue of widespread chaining of flexible contracts among multiple employers, yet analysis revealed that this was largely a non-issue.
The anticipated adjustments would not have substantially impacted the overall volume of compensation paid without insurance premium contributions. The proposed legislation seemed unlikely to realize its objectives effectively, raising concerns about the magnitude of change it would necessitate from both employers and regulatory bodies. The amendment proposed by Minister Jurečka thus argues for a more prudent approach: to rescind these adjustments temporarily and await longitudinal statistical data regarding the registration of work agreements before proceeding further.
The threshold for untaxed earnings, which has languished at 10,000 crowns for the past decade, is set to remain intact. While employer representatives have been advocating for an increase to at least 15,000 crowns, it appears that the limit will instead be tied to a percentage of the average wage, projected to raise to 11,500 crowns in 2025, according to the accompanying explanatory report.
The financial impact of these amendments is expected to result in a deficit of approximately 2 billion CZK in annual income from insurance premiums and state employment policy contributions. Specifically, an increase in the health insurance participation limit beyond 10,000 crowns is anticipated to yield loss estimates in the hundreds of millions of CZK.
The chairwoman of the ANO deputies, Alena Schillerová, adamantly asserted that the revisions concerning work agreements have been uniquely destructive to corporations, leading to the liquidation of hundreds of thousands of contract holders and exacerbating illegal employment, as many experts and opposition figures had forewarned the government. After a year of navigating this complex system, the cabinet has recognized that the structure governing registration and taxation of agreements is impractical at best.
What are the potential implications of the revised work execution agreements for businesses and workers in the evolving labor landscape?
Ut undermining the existing framework, demonstrating a disconnect between the government’s intentions and the realities of the labor market. As the dust settles from this bureaucratic upheaval, many are left wondering what the future holds for work execution agreements.
The ongoing saga of labor laws may be deemed a cautionary tale of how well-meaning policies can spiral into chaos when inadequately understood or unrealistically applied. The government’s attempts to regulate and streamline worker classifications may have unintentionally stifled the very flexibility they aimed to enhance, leaving businesses in a precarious position.
As entrepreneurs brace themselves for the sudden shifts in regulations, the narrative continues to evolve. It remains critical for policymakers to engage proactively with industry stakeholders to ensure that any future reforms are not only pragmatic but also effectively address the needs of the labor market without imposing undue burdens on businesses.
the recent legislative backpedal on work agreements signifies not just the challenges of modern employment systems but also the pressing need for more stable and coherent labor policies that truly support both workers and employers. As the government moves forward, the lessons learned from this tumultuous chapter could pave the way for more thoughtful governance in the realm of labor relations.
