Google’s AI Super Bowl ad is wrong about cheese

Google’s AI Super Bowl ad is wrong about cheese

Google‘s AI‌ Takes a Cheese‌ Wrong Turn


During the recent super ‌Bowl spectacle, Google unveiled a series of captivating commercials⁤ highlighting how small businesses across all 50 states can ​leverage the ‌power of Gemini AI.However,eagle-eyed viewers,particularly cheese enthusiasts,noticed a ‍curious discrepancy in the Wisconsin-themed ad.

⁤ As ⁤noted⁣ by ⁤social media user‍ @natejhake, the AI-generated text proclaimed that Gouda cheese constitutes “50 to 60 percent⁢ of the world’s cheese consumption.” This claim, while seemingly bold, raises​ serious questions about the accuracy of Google’s AI.

⁢ Andrew ‍Novakovic,‍ E.V. Baker Professor of ‍agricultural Economics Emeritus at Cornell University, sheds light on the issue.”While Gouda is likely the most common single variety in world trade, it⁢ is almost assuredly not the most widely consumed,” he states. Furthermore, Novakovic points out, “I don’t think there is hard data to substantiate consumption of particular varieties of cheeses on a global scale. My guess is that Indian Paneer or the ubiquitous ⁣‘fresh’ cheeses of South America, Africa, and western and southern Asia⁤ have far larger⁢ volumes than ‍Gouda.”

The commercial does acknowledge ⁣the AI’s limitations with a disclaimer ‍reading, ⁣”This is a⁢ creative ‌writing aid, and is not intended to be factual.” This disclaimer, however, seems somewhat incongruous given that the ad ⁢portrays a business owner utilizing Gemini to craft factual descriptions for their website.

⁢ ‍Adding to the intrigue is the recent move by Google to integrate all its AI features into Workspace and concurrently increase its subscription prices. This development, coupled with the ‍ inaccuracy surrounding the Gouda claim, has fueled speculation among users and industry analysts alike.

Google⁤ has yet to respond to requests for⁢ comment regarding this incident.

How does this incident with Google’s AI and the Gouda cheese claim impact user trust in AI-generated content, particularly when presented as factual information?

Google’s AI Takes ‌a Cheese ‌Wrong Turn: An‌ Expert‌ Weighs In

During the recent super Bowl spectacle, Google unveiled​ a series of captivating‌ commercials highlighting how small businesses across all 50 states can leverage the⁣ power of gemini AI. However, eagle-eyed viewers, particularly cheese enthusiasts, ​noticed a curious discrepancy in the Wisconsin-themed ad. As⁢ noted ‍by social media user @natejhake, the AI-generated text proclaimed that Gouda cheese constitutes ​”50 to 60 percent of the world’s cheese consumption.” This claim, while seemingly bold,⁣ raises serious questions about the accuracy of Google’s AI.

An Expert’s​ Perspective

andrew Novakovic, E.V. ​Baker Professor of Agricultural Economics Emeritus at Cornell University,sheds light on the issue. “While Gouda ‍is ⁢likely the most common single variety in world trade, it is almost assuredly not the most widely consumed,”​ he states. Moreover, Novakovic ‍points out, “I don’t think there is hard data to substantiate consumption of particular⁤ varieties of ‍cheeses on a ⁣global scale.My guess is that Indian Paneer or the ubiquitous ‘fresh’ cheeses of‍ South America,Africa,and western and southern Asia have far larger volumes than gouda.”

Fact vs.Fiction: Where Does AI Draw ⁢the Line?

The commercial does acknowledge the AI’s limitations with ​a disclaimer reading,”This⁣ is a creative writing aid,and is not intended to be factual.” This disclaimer, however, seems somewhat incongruous given that the ad portrays a business owner utilizing Gemini to craft factual‌ descriptions for their website.

A Broader Context: AI ​Integration and User Concerns

Adding to the ​intrigue is the recent move by Google to integrate all its ‌AI features into Workspace ‌and concurrently increase its subscription prices. This development, coupled with the ⁢inaccuracy surrounding the Gouda claim, has fueled speculation among ⁤users⁤ and industry analysts alike.

what are your thoughts? Does this incident raise concerns about the reliability of AI-generated content, especially when presented as factual? Share your opinions in the comments below.

Google has ⁢yet to respond to requests for‌ comment regarding this incident.

Leave a Replay