controversy Erupts over Latvia’s “Golden Microphone” Award Nominations
A fierce debate has ignited over the nominations for the prestigious Latvian music award, ”Zelta Mikrofons” (Golden microphone), with accusations of jury misconduct and manipulated results.The controversy centers around the band ”Olas”, whose song “Narnia” they claim was unfairly removed from the top five nominees. “Olas” alleges that the song was initially included in the top five by the jury but then suspiciously removed. They publicly voiced their concerns in a viral TikTok video,which has garnered almost 200,000 views.“The video, in which the group criticizes the ’Golden Microphone’ jury, has been viewed almost 200 thousand times on the social network ‘TikTok’.” The band criticized jury chairman Jānis Žilde and his friend Normunds Vucāns, stating that the decision to remove “Narnia” disregarded the jury’s initial vote and was a “shockwave beam” that ignored the opinions of the judges. Organizers of the ”Golden Microphone” vehemently refute these claims, branding the band’s video as “fabricated disinformation.” They explain that the selection process involves two rounds of voting, and while “Narnia” made it into the top five initially, it was later replaced by another song.According to the organizers of the award, the video published by the group is fabricated disinformation, combining several unrelated facts, drawing unfounded conclusions from them. elita Mīlgrave, the organizer of “Zelta Mikrofons”, elaborated on the process, stating that after the initial vote, there is a second stage where the jury finalizes the top five. She likened the controversy to someone ”looking through a keyhole, pulling something out, and taking it away.” Adding fuel to the fire, the band “Instrumenti” also withdrew their nomination for Best album of the Year, claiming a similar experience where their song was removed from the “Best Song” category after the first round of voting. “I am especially sorry about ‘Instruments’,” admitted Mīlgrave. She acknowledged the band’s previous successes and accolades, including awards from the same jury in the past. The “Golden Microphone” organizers are currently evaluating whether to involve law enforcement regarding the dissemination of alleged false news by “Olas”. The award ceremony is still scheduled to take place on January 18th.
Google Analytics used to show you the specific keywords people used to find your website through organic search. However, due to privacy concerns, Google stopped providing this data, replacing it with “(not provided)”.
This means that within the ’Source/Medium’ report under the ‘Acquisition’ section, you’ll see “(not provided)” rather of actual keywords for many organic searches [[1](https://elitedigitalmarketing.ca/seo/how-to-unlock-your-not-provided-keywords-in-google-analytics/)] .
While you can’t fully unlock those “(not provided)” keywords within Google Analytics, there are some strategies you can use to get a better understanding of what terms are driving traffic to your site.
## Olas and the “Narnia” Controversy: An Archyde Exclusive
**Martins Roga**, lead singer of the popular Latvian band “Olas”, sits down with Archyde to discuss the recent controversy surrounding the “zelta Mikrofons” (Golden Microphone) award nominations.
**Martins,** thank you for joining us today. Let’s address the elephant in the room: the removal of “Narnia” from the top five nominees for the “Zelta Mikrofons”. Can you tell us what happened?
**martins:** Of course. As you know, “Narnia” had the incredible support of our fans, and we felt confident about our placement amongst the top contenders. We were informed by the organizers that we were indeed among the top five nominees.
However, shortly after this announcement, we were blindsided by the news that “narnia” had been removed from the top five without any clear description.
**This has sparked a huge debate among fans and within the Latvian music community.”Olas” even posted a TikTok video that has gone viral. what prompted you to share your story in such a public manner?**
**Martins:** we felt it was meaningful to be clear with our fans.This situation felt deeply unfair. They rallied behind us and deserve to know what happened. Openness and accountability from the jury are crucial for maintaining the integrity of such a prestigious award.
**What do you hope to achieve with this public outcry? What kind of resolution are you seeking?**
**Martins:** At this point, we’re not focused on winning the award. Our primary goal is to shed light on the lack of transparency surrounding the nomination process.
We believe the “Zelta Mikrofons” Jury shoudl offer a clear and transparent explanation for the sudden removal of “Narnia” from the top five. This situation raises serious questions about the fairness and impartiality of the selection process.
**What message do you have for the jury and the organizers of the “Zelta Mikrofons”?**
**Martins:** The “Zelta Mikrofons” is a respected institution in Latvian music. We urge the jury and organizers to take these concerns seriously and review their processes to ensure fairness and accountability in the future.
Our experience should serve as a wake-up call for fostering a more transparent and equitable music award system that genuinely reflects the talent and hard work of Latvian artists.
**Martins, thank you for sharing your outlook with Archyde and our readers. We appreciate your candor and hope for a fair resolution to this controversy.**
[1](https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/vienojas-par-daugavpils-universitates-ieklausanu-latvijas-universitate.a496541/)
