2023-08-06 03:24:52
Sergio Domínguez Cardoso Aug 5, 2023, 9:32 p.m. Reading: 3 min.
According to the IFAB Laws of the Game, the goalkeeper must not distract the kicker or else the kick must be retaken
the goalkeeper of Nahuel Guzman Tigers committed two violations of the regulations of the International Football Association Board, during the penalty shootout to define the winner in the round of 16 key in Leagues Cup ante Vancouver Whitecapsand in one of them there are arguments to repeat the charge, however, he was only reprimanded prior to the execution of the play.
According to an update to the Laws of the Game that came into effect on July 1, 2023 and is colloquially referred to as ‘Ley anti Dibu‘, the goalkeeper is prohibited from distracting the collector.
“The goalkeeper must remain on his own goal line, between the two goal posts and in front of the kicker until the ball is hit. The goalkeeper must not behave in such a way as to unlawfully distract the kicker, e.g. eg not delay the execution of the penalty or touch the posts, the crossbar or the net of the goal.
During the second collection of Vancouver Whitecaps, Nahuel Guzman he made ‘mime’ gestures once the referee whistled for Sergio Córdova to take the shot, which ultimately ended in a goal, and did not warrant further attention from the referee because the Laws of the Game stipulated it.
In case the goalkeeper breaks Law 14 for the first time during the match, the code indicates:
If the ball enters the goal, a goal will be awarded.
If the ball does not enter the goal or bounces off the crossbar or the posts, the penalty kick will only be retaken if the goalkeeper’s offense clearly influences the kicker.
If the goalkeeper prevents the ball from entering the goal, the penalty kick will be retaken.
If the goalkeeper’s infringement entails a repetition of the penalty kick, the goalkeeper will be warned if it is the first offense of the match, and he will be cautioned in case of repeat offence.
However, Nahuel Guzman He repeated inappropriate behavior prior to the fourth penalty, in accordance with the regulations, as he took a streamer out of his mouth before standing on the goal line to await the shot that he saved and ultimately meant victory.
Why is it called the ‘Anti Dibu Law’?
last march, International Football Association Board approved a rule to limit the movements of goalkeepers during the collection of penalties and recommended that the referees pay special attention to comply with the provisions.
The foregoing, due to the example of the Argentine goalkeeper Emiliano ‘Dibu’ Martínez during the last Qatar 2022 World Cup, in which he was champion, but he was seen challenging collectors in turn both with words and movements.
Regarding the norm, ‘Back‘ Martínez He said on August 4 that “they made it late” and he doesn’t care.
“I loved it, because they always look for some excuse. But I told my family and my close people ‘but I don’t care, we are already champions of everything’. They did it late,” said the also goalkeeper of the Aston Villa in street dogsUrbana Play radio program.
“The forwards can stop, they can do everything, and we can’t even speak. It seems to me that it’s wrong, but each one (…) I don’t care, I already stopped what I had to stop,” he concluded.
1691297542
#Nahuel #Guzmán #break #Anti #Dibu #Law #penalties #Whitecaps
