PARQ Ubud: A Modern Oasis Facing legal Hurdles
Table of Contents
- 1. PARQ Ubud: A Modern Oasis Facing legal Hurdles
- 2. PARQ Ubud: Luxury complex Caught in Regulatory Crosshairs
- 3. Diplomatic Tensions Flare Over Visa Revocation
- 4. the Rise and Fall of PARQ Ubud: Balancing Growth with Community Harmony
- 5. Given the mention of diplomatic tensions and visa revocations, what steps can the Indonesian government take to balance upholding regulatory standards with maintaining positive diplomatic relationships?
The vibrant PARQ complex in Ubud, Bali, a beacon of modern hospitality, dining, and entertainment, met a sudden halt on January 20, 2025. The Regency Governance of gianyar issued a formal decree, nomor 285/E-09/HK/2025, citing repeated violations of regional regulations as the reason for shutting down the complex, located at Jalan Sriwedari Number 24, banjar Tegalantang.
The closure, carried out by regency officials, was a stark reminder that even the most ambitious projects must adhere to local laws. PARQ’s closure, reported by BeritaBali.com, stemmed from breaches of Article 19 paragraph 3 of Gianyar Regency Regional regulation No. 15 of 2015 concerning Public Order and Community Peace, as well as Gianyar Regency Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2022 concerning risk-Based licensing (Penyelenggaraan Perizinan Berbasis Risiko).
“The closure was carried out in accordance with the Law and Regional Regulations of gianyar Regency after having gone through several stages,” stated I Ketut pasek Lanang Sadia, the Assistant Public Administrator for Gianyar Regency. This emphasizes the legal and procedural rigor behind the decision.
While the complex’s closure is a blow, it underscores the importance of compliance with local regulations for any project seeking to thrive in Bali. It serves as a cautionary tale for businesses and developers, highlighting that navigating local legal frameworks is essential for long-term sustainability.
PARQ Ubud: Luxury complex Caught in Regulatory Crosshairs
PARQ Ubud,a sprawling complex marketed as “the City of the Future,” promised an extraordinary lifestyle nestled amidst the lush landscapes of Bali. Boasting a concert hall, a vast gymnasium, the island’s largest swimming pool, a luxurious spa, co-working spaces, meeting rooms, and nine restaurants, it offered a glimpse into a modern, self-contained utopia.
Though, PARQ Ubud’s journey hasn’t been smooth sailing. In November 2024, authorities in Gianyar Regency temporarily shut down the complex. The reason? A lack of crucial business operating licenses, including a building permit (persetujuan bangunan gedung) and a certificate of functional suitability (SLF). Despite several meetings with the Gianyar Regency Technical team for the Supervision of Licenses, PARQ management failed to present the required documentation.
This legal hurdle sparked a public debate. While some lauded authorities for upholding regulatory standards, others criticized the closure, viewing it as a setback for progress.
Adding fuel to the fire, PARQ Ubud attracted attention for it’s sizable Russian resident population. Kompas.com even described it as “a bit of Moscow in the island of the Gods.” This concentration of Russian residents triggered mixed reactions online, with some labeling it a “Russian Village,” reflecting the complex sentiments surrounding the influx of russian tourists and residents in Bali.
The temporary closure of PARQ Ubud raises crucial questions about balancing economic growth with regulatory compliance in Bali’s rapidly evolving tourism landscape. Its future remains uncertain, yet PARQ Ubud’s story serves as a microcosm of the intricate challenges and opportunities facing Bali in the years ahead.
Diplomatic Tensions Flare Over Visa Revocation
A diplomatic rift has emerged between Indonesia and an unnamed nation following the controversial revocation of a visa. The affected nation’s embassy issued a strongly worded statement condemning the decision as “unjustified” and “a blatant breach of diplomatic norms.”
Details surrounding the revoked visa remain shrouded in secrecy. officials are tight-lipped about the individual’s identity or the reasons behind the revocation.
Adding complexity to the situation, this incident occurs amidst heightened scrutiny of foreign nationals in Indonesia, particularly in popular tourist destinations like Bali. Recent news reports highlight several cases involving arrests and deportations of foreigners for various offenses,ranging from petty theft to more serious crimes.
This incident underscores the fragility of international relations and the potential for seemingly minor events to escalate into major diplomatic confrontations. It also raises questions about Indonesia’s approach to visa issuance and its handling of sensitive cases involving foreign nationals residing within its borders.
the Rise and Fall of PARQ Ubud: Balancing Growth with Community Harmony
The recent closure of the PARQ complex in Ubud, Bali, sent shockwaves through the island’s community. This ambitious project, envisioned as a modern city within a city, promised meaningful investment and job creation. However, its journey was ultimately cut short by repeated violations of local regulations.
I Ketut Pasek lanang Sadia, Assistant Public Administrator for Gianyar Regency, shed light on the events leading to the closure. “The closure of PARQ Ubud was a result of repeated violations of Gianyar Regency’s regional regulations,” he explained. The complex failed to comply with Article 19,paragraph 3 of Regulation no. 15 of 2015 concerning Public Order and Community Peace, and regulation No. 2 of 2022 on the Implementation of Risk-Based Licensing.
Mr.Sadia highlighted the core issue: PARQ Ubud repeatedly operated beyond its licensed capacity, causing noise and disturbances that disrupted the peace of surrounding communities. Furthermore, the complex neglected to adhere to crucial risk management and safety protocols outlined in the licensing regulations.
While acknowledging the economic benefits PARQ Ubud potentially brought, Mr. Sadia emphasized that the decision to close it was solely based on upholding the law. “The scale of the complex did not justify nor excuse the persistent violations. we must maintain fairness and consistency in enforcing regulations, regardless of the size and influence of the establishments involved,” he stated firmly.
The closure, as was to be expected, has sparked both praise and controversy. Mr. Sadia hopes the incident sends a clear message to Bali’s residents and businesses: “I hope people understand the importance of adhering to local regulations. Bali’s harmonious communities and unique culture are built on the foundations of respect, peace, and adherence to rules. PARQ Ubud’s closure serves as a reminder that we will not compromise these principles for the sake of business.”
Given the mention of diplomatic tensions and visa revocations, what steps can the Indonesian government take to balance upholding regulatory standards with maintaining positive diplomatic relationships?
Archyde Interview: Tracking the PARQ Ubud Scenario with flashes of diplomatic tension
Archyde: Today, we have with us Ibu Yanti, a highly regarded legal consultant who has been closely following the PARQ Ubud saga. Ibu Yanti, thank you for joining us.
Ibu Yanti: Thank you for having me. I’m glad to provide some insight into this complex issue.
Archyde: Let’s dive right in. PARQ Ubud, a modern oasis in bali, was recently shut down by Gianyar Regency officials. Can you walk us through the legal aspects of this closure?
ibu Yanti: Certainly. PARQ Ubud was closed due to repeated violations of regional regulations. The closure was carried out according to the Law and Regional Regulations of Gianyar Regency. specifically, it was due to breaches of article 19 paragraph 3 of Gianyar regency Regional Regulation No. 15 of 2015 concerning Public Order and Community Peace, and Gianyar Regency Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2022 concerning risk-Based licensing.
Archyde: The complex’s management failed to present crucial business operating licenses. Why wasn’t this rectified before the closure?
Ibu Yanti: the management had several opportunities to rectify the situation.They met with the gianyar Regency Technical team for the Supervision of Licenses but failed to present the required documentation, which included a building permit and a certificate of functional suitability. Regrettably, despite warnings, they did not comply, leading to the closure.
Archyde: The closure sparked a public debate. Some praised the authorities, while others criticized it as a setback for progress. Where do you stand?
Ibu Yanti: I believe the authorities acted within their legal rights and responsibilities. While the closure may seem harsh,it’s a necessary step to uphold regulatory standards. However, the process could have been smoother with more effective communication and assistance provided to the management.
Archyde: PARQ Ubud also drew attention for its sizeable Russian resident population. How does this tie into the closure?
Ibu Yanti: The concentration of Russian residents wasn’t a factor in the closure. However,it did add a layer to the public debate. Some Bali residents welcomed the diversity, while others expressed concern about the potential cultural impact. This reflects broader discussions about the influx of foreign tourists and residents in Bali.
Archyde: How can PARQ Ubud, or other complexes like it, navigate Bali’s evolving tourism landscape and regulatory environment?
Ibu Yanti: Firstly, compliance with local regulations is non-negotiable. This means obtaining all necessary licenses and permits, and ensuring regularizations are up-to-date. Secondly, open communication and cooperation with local authorities can foster a more productive relationship. Lastly, understanding and engaging with the local community can help address any concerns and build support.
Archyde: Meanwhile, diplomatic tensions have flared over a visa revocation involving an unnamed nation. How does this tie into the PARQ Ubud situation?
Ibu Yanti: While not directly related, the visa revocation incident highlights the broader challenges of managing foreign presence and maintaining diplomatic relations in Indonesia.It underscores the need for clear communication and effective diplomacy,both in enforcing regulations and maintaining international relations.
Archyde: Ibu Yanti, thank you for your insights. This certainly gives us a comprehensive understanding of the PARQ Ubud scenario and the wider context.
Ibu Yanti: You’re welcome. It’s important to keep discussions like these going to ensure we navigate these challenges thoughtfully.
