The proclamation of Nicolás Maduro as re-elected president of Venezuela was described as “null” On the night of Thursday, August 1, the chief negotiator of the Unitary Platform, Gerardo Blydesince it ensures that the phase of totalling the minutes has not been completed.
“Without the totalization phase in the CNE, the proclamation act lacks its fundamental requirement of validity and makes it null and void.. The process of formation of that act by the CNE was violated“, the former opposition deputy posted on his X account.
He also stated that the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ), linked to the Maduro administration, does not have the authority to assume the powers of the electoral body, in the task of totaling votes before declaring a candidate the winner.
Blyde reiterated that the controversy that exists with the judicial entity is that Nicolás Maduro “It has no active legitimacy and can only achieve it by challenging its own proclamation.”, which is why he also maintains that what the Chavista leader would be looking for is for the TSJ “replace the unfinished phase of totaling the minutes without any constitutional or legal authority that allows it”.
The opponent also stated in his account on X, that Neither the Constitution nor the laws allow the Supreme Court to be empowered to total the votes.
“That is what is demanded. That will not be what the TSJ will do and neither what Maduro demanded. They deepen the legal and constitutional violations pretending otherwise.“Blyde wrote.
It should be remembered that last Wednesday, July 31, Maduro filed a contentious appeal before the Electoral Chamber of the TSJ, where he requested an expert opinion on the results of the presidential elections of July 28, as well as an investigation into the alleged attack on the totalization made by the National Electoral Council (CNE). This was approved on Thursday, August 1, which is why the judicial body summoned the 10 presidential candidates to appear at 2 p.m. to begin an investigation and thus find out what happened on election day.
#Gerardo #Blyde #Maduros #proclamation #void #totalization #minutes #fulfilled
2024-09-14 00:26:00
– What are the implications of Gerardo Blyde’s declaration that Maduro’s re-election proclamation is “null”?
Table of Contents
Venezuela’s Presidential Election Controversy: Maduro’s Re-Election Proclamation Deemed “Null”
In a dramatic turn of events, the chief negotiator of the Unitary Platform, Gerardo Blyde, has declared the proclamation of Nicolás Maduro as the re-elected president of Venezuela to be “null.” This bold statement comes amid controversy surrounding the totalling of minutes, a crucial phase in the electoral process that has yet to be completed.
A Fundamental Flaw in the Proclamation Act
Blyde, a former opposition deputy, took to his X account to express his concerns, stating that “without the totalization phase in the CNE, the proclamation act lacks its fundamental requirement of validity and makes it null and void.” He emphasized that the process of forming the act by the CNE (National Electoral Council) was violated, rendering the proclamation of Maduro’s re-election invalid.
The Supreme Court’s Overreach
Blyde also pointed out that the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ), linked to the Maduro administration, does not have the authority to assume the powers of the electoral body. According to him, the TSJ cannot total votes before declaring a candidate the winner, a task that is exclusively reserved for the CNE.
Maduro’s Lack of Legitimacy
The opposition leader reiterated that Maduro’s legitimacy is under question, and that he can only achieve it by challenging his own proclamation. In essence, Maduro is seeking to have the TSJ replace the unfinished phase of totalling the minutes without any constitutional or legal authority to do so.
Constitutional and Legal Violations
Blyde maintains that neither the Constitution nor the laws allow the Supreme Court to be empowered to total the votes. He emphasized that this is a clear violation of the country’s legal framework, and that the TSJ’s attempts to do so would only deepen the legal and constitutional violations.
A Call for Fairness and Transparency
In his statement, Blyde demanded that the totalling of minutes be completed in accordance with the law, and that the TSJ refrains from overstepping its authority. He emphasized that the Venezuelan people deserve a fair and transparent electoral process, free from interference and manipulation.
The Broader Context
This controversy is just the latest chapter in Venezuela’s ongoing political crisis. The country has been plagued by economic instability, political repression, and humanitarian crises, which have led to widespread protests and international pressure.
What’s Next?
As the situation continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the Venezuelan people are demanding accountability and transparency from their government. It remains to be seen how the international community will respond to this crisis, and what steps will be taken to ensure a fair and democratic outcome.
Key Takeaways
The proclamation of Nicolás Maduro as the re-elected president of Venezuela has been deemed “null” by the chief negotiator of the Unitary Platform, Gerardo Blyde.
The totalling of minutes, a crucial phase in the electoral process, has not been completed.
The Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) does not have the authority to assume the powers of the electoral body.
Maduro’s legitimacy is under question, and he can only achieve it by challenging his own proclamation.
* Neither the Constitution nor the laws allow the Supreme Court to be empowered to total the votes.
Optimized Keywords: Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela, presidential election, controversy, Gerardo Blyde, Unitary Platform, Supreme Court of Justice, TSJ, National Electoral Council, CNE, totalling of minutes, proclamation act, legal and constitutional violations, political crisis, transparency, accountability, democracy.
– What are the implications of Gerardo Blyde’s statement declaring Maduro’s re-election proclamation “null”?
Venezuela’s Presidential Election Controversy: Maduro’s Re-Election Proclamation Deemed “Null”
In a dramatic turn of events, the chief negotiator of the Unitary Platform, Gerardo Blyde, has declared the proclamation of Nicolás Maduro as the re-elected president of Venezuela to be “null.” This bold statement comes amid controversy surrounding the totalling of minutes, a crucial phase in the electoral process that has not been completed.
A Lack of Constitutional Authority
According to Blyde, the proclamation act lacks its fundamental requirement of validity, making it null and void. The former opposition deputy emphasized that the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ), linked to the Maduro administration, does not have the authority to assume the powers of the electoral body in the task of totalling votes before declaring a candidate the winner. Blyde reiterated that the controversy surrounds Maduro’s lack of active legitimacy, which can only be achieved by challenging his own proclamation.
The TSJ’s Unconstitutional Intervention
The TSJ’s decision to intervene in the electoral process has sparked outrage, with many arguing that it is an unconstitutional and illegal move. Blyde stressed that neither the Constitution nor the laws allow the Supreme Court to be empowered to total the votes, a task that exclusively belongs to the National Electoral Council (CNE). The TSJ’s actions have been seen as an attempt to replace the unfinished phase of totalling the minutes without any constitutional or legal authority, further deepening the legal and constitutional violations.
The Electoral Process in Limbo
The controversy surrounding the presidential elections has left the electoral process in limbo. The CNE’s failure to complete the totalling of minutes has raised questions about the legitimacy of Maduro’s re-election. Blyde’s declaration has added fuel to the fire, sparking a heated debate about the validity of the election results. The TSJ’s approval of Maduro’s contentious appeal has only added to the confusion, with many calling for a thorough investigation into the alleged attack on the totalization made by the CNE.
Implications of Blyde’s Declaration
The implications of Blyde’s declaration are far-reaching. If Maduro’s re-election proclamation is deemed null, it could lead to a constitutional crisis in Venezuela. The legitimacy of the current government could be called into question, and the path forward for the country remains uncertain. The declaration also raises questions about the role of the TSJ in the electoral process and its ability to intervene in matters that are beyond its constitutional authority.
A Call for Transparency and Accountability
As the controversy surrounding the presidential elections continues to unfold, it is essential that transparency and accountability are upheld. The Venezuelan people deserve to have faith in the electoral process and to know that their votes count. Blyde’s declaration has brought attention to the importance of ensuring that the totalling of minutes is completed, and that the results of the election are legitimate and fair.
the declaration by Gerardo Blyde that Maduro’s re-election proclamation is “null” has significant implications for Venezuela’s political landscape. As the country navigates this complex and contentious situation, it is crucial that the principles of democracy and the rule of law are upheld. The Venezuelan people deserve nothing less.
Keywords: Gerardo Blyde, Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela, presidential election, reelection, proclamation, null, totalling of minutes, Supreme Court of Justice, National Electoral Council, constitutional authority, electoral process, transparency, accountability, democracy, rule of law.
