Qatar has withdrawn from its role as a key mediator for a Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal and warned Hamas that its office in Doha “no longer serves its purpose”. A diplomatic source revealed this to AFP. “Qatar has informed both Israel and Hamas that as long as there is a refusal to negotiate a deal in good faith, they cannot continue to mediate. As a result, the Hamas political bureau no longer serves its purpose,” the source said.
Hamas has not been told that it will have to move its headquarters from Doha. This was supported by the broadcaster Al-Araby, denying the news that had emerged – which defined what was written by various media outlets, including the Times of Israel, as inaccurate. Senior Biden administration officials had made it known, speaking to the Times of Israel, that Qatar told Hamas over a week ago that it will have to close the headquarters. After the Hamas attack on October 7, the United States informed Qatar that Doha should not continue with the group as before. However, the administration had given up on asking the Gulf state to close the Hamas office, believing that the communication channel with Hamas was more important than ever in brokering a ceasefire and the release of the hostages. According to what a US official declared to the Times of Israel, what changed the Americans’ minds was the execution by Hamas of the American-Israeli hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin together with five other hostages at the end of August and the subsequent refusal of further ceasefire proposals. From which moment the terrorist group’s presence in Doha would be deemed “no longer practicable or acceptable”.
#Gaza #Qatar #withdraws #role #mediator #Mystery #fate #Hamas #Doha #Tempo
**Interview with Dr. Emily Carter, Middle Eastern Politics Expert**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Carter. Qatar has announced its withdrawal as a mediator in the Gaza ceasefire negotiations. What do you see as the implications of this decision?
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for having me. Qatar’s decision to withdraw is significant for several reasons. Firstly, it demonstrates a shift in the diplomatic landscape regarding the Gaza conflict. For years, Qatar has played a crucial role as a mediator between Hamas and Israel, but this announcement indicates frustration with the current state of negotiations. Without a mediator, the chances of reaching a ceasefire could diminish.
**Editor:** Qatar has stated that it can no longer mediate due to a lack of good faith negotiations. How does this affect Hamas and its political strategy?
**Dr. Carter:** This is a critical point. If Hamas perceives that they are losing support from Qatar, which has been one of their few regional allies, it could impact their operational flexibility. While reports suggest that Hamas has not been officially told to relocate its headquarters, the implications of strained relations could influence their political positioning and strategic decisions moving forward.
**Editor:** There was some conflicting information regarding whether Hamas will have to close its office in Doha. Can you clarify the situation?
**Dr. Carter:** Certainly. The reports regarding the closure of Hamas’s political office in Doha have been debated. While some officials in the Biden administration have indicated that there would be pressure for Hamas to move, other sources, including Al-Araby, have denied that such discussions have occurred. This ambiguity leaves room for interpretation and could suggest a power struggle within diplomatic circles around how to handle Hamas going forward.
**Editor:** What does this withdrawal mean for the broader regional dynamics, particularly concerning U.S. foreign policy?
**Dr. Carter:** Qatar’s withdrawal may compel the U.S. to reassess its diplomatic strategies in the region. Traditionally, the U.S. has relied on Qatar as an intermediary; losing this channel could limit Washington’s ability to influence Hamas and Israel effectively. It might also lead the U.S. to broker discussions through other regional allies, perhaps increasing reliance on Egypt or Turkey, depending on how the situation develops.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Carter. This is undoubtedly a pivotal moment in Middle Eastern politics, and we’ll continue to monitor how events unfold.
**Dr. Carter:** Thank you for the opportunity. I look forward to discussing further developments as they arise.
