Galaxy A23 5G vs Moto G53: Do you trade battery and cameras for sound and performance? | Comparative

2023-05-21 19:10:00

The Galaxy A23 5G and the Moto G53 are two more basic mid-range smartphones, which are focused on delivering some evolutions for the segment, but still with a very affordable price in the market.

In this dispute between Samsung and Motorola, which manufacturer takes the best among affordable devices with 5G? You will check the answer now, here at TudoCelular.


Samsung
15 Abr

Moto G53 5G: Evolve


Motorola
03 Mar

Comparative Index

design and connectivity

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Starting with the design, we find two mobiles made up entirely of plastic, with a matte finish to look more premium. Both also use a rectangular block to contain the cameras at the rear.

The Moto comes with some advantage for coming with a more compact and lighter body than the Galaxy, in addition to already having a notch in the form of a hole, while the Korean rival still has the drop layout.

Motorola Moto G53

Both Samsung and Motorola chose not to invest in any dust and liquid certification. In addition, the duo’s fingerprint reader is located at the rear, integrated into the power button.

At least they support storage expansion. But only the A32 has a dedicated microSD slot. The G53 provides a hybrid drawer, which shares the space for the card with the second carrier chip. The cell phones have fifth-generation Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.1, in addition to NFC technology, for approximation payments.

With a more modern, compact and lightweight design, it is the Moto G that takes the lead in this duel.

best construction

None

Better protection once morest scratches

None

more modern look

Moto G53

Is the slot hybrid or dedicated?

Galaxy A23 5G

Best notch solution

Moto G53

Best biometrics solution

None

Best endurance certification

None

Which is thinner and lighter?

Moto G53

Tem NFC?

Both

Theme Wi-Fi 6?

None

more advanced bluetooth

None

multimedia and resources

Bodies


The manufacturers saved on screen and put only one of the LCD type in these intermediaries. This results in a more compromised level of brightness, contrast and viewing angle for the user. At least, they sought to compensate with a refresh rate of 120 Hz, to give greater fluidity to the system’s animations.

The Galaxy’s display is 6.6 inches, slightly larger than the 6.5 inches on the Moto’s panel. The G53 responds with a slightly higher frontal utilization, thanks to the smaller bezels. The problem is that it has a resolution limited to HD +, with a lower definition than the Full HD + present in the A23 5G. The Korean is still the only one of the duo to come with a Gorilla Glass 5 glass, which guarantees protection once morest scratches.

Samsung notes the point and leaves everything the same on the scoreboard.

best screen technology

None

Best screen brightness

None

more colors

None

Best screen resolution

Galaxy A23 5G

bigger screen

Galaxy A23 5G

Better screen-to-body ratio

Moto G53

High Hz screen?

Both

Better protection once morest scratches

Galaxy A23 5G

Overall screen quality

Galaxy A23 5G

As


The Korean preferred to leave only a mono sound output on her device. Motorola, on the other hand, bet on a stereo system, which takes advantage of the call speaker as a secondary channel, to give the user greater immersion.

Another consequence of the decision is greater sound power for the G53. Even so, the A23 delivers a slightly superior balance of frequencies, even if it is far from perfect. On both sides, there is a standard P2 connector to plug in any compatible headphones. Too bad none of the companies send an accessory in the package.

Stereo sound gives the Moto the point.

Sound is stereo?

Moto G53

Does it have P2 input?

Both

Greater frequency balance

Galaxy A23 5G

sound power

Moto G53

Do headphones come in the box?

None

System


The A23 5G was launched with Android 12 and received version 13 only later, while the G53 already came out of the box with Android 13 native. Despite the difference, it is the Korean that will have the longest useful life, due to the higher number of software updates guaranteed by the Korean.

Navigation smoothness will not be a problem in these interfaces, due to the presence of the 120 Hz rate in the duo. The fast mobile network won’t be an issue either, with 5G support on both handsets.

In features, Samsung puts some of its traditional ones here, like the Edge Screen shortcuts and its Samsung Wallet wallet. On the other hand, Motorola stands out for its famous gestures to activate the flashlight or quickly open the camera. Companies even offer Secure Folder to keep apps and media password protected.

Galaxy’s longevity weighs more here and gives it the point.

Well-updated system?

Both

Will the system be updated in the future?

Galaxy A23 5G

Which system or customization has more and better features?

None

Is there a 5G mobile network?

Both

More fluid software

Both

Performance

The A23 5G is powered by the Snapdragon 695 platform, versus the Snapdragon 480 Plus powered by the G53. With 4GB of RAM in each, which one is faster? Our tests indicated an advantage of almost 30 seconds for Moto, as it held a little longer with apps open in the background.

Is Galaxy’s software missing optimization? Perhaps, as the benchmarks show a small win for his hardware in both Geekbench and AnTuTu. In games, the performance is very similar, with a good performance even in more demanding titles.

Motorola scores the point for better multitasking.

Who does better on the opening test?

Moto G53

Who wins in the most demanding games?

Both

Who has the best benchmark numbers?

Galaxy A23 5G

What is the most up to date processor?

None

Which has better RAM/CPU balance?

Moto G53

Which has more storage?

None

Battery

These devices have a 5,000 mAh battery, a capacity that has become increasingly standard in the market. And how do they fare in practice? We saw in our standardized tests that the Galaxy reached almost 25 hours of autonomy, with more than 4 hours above the Moto’s total time.

When we go to recharge, the 15 W adapter sent by Samsung still takes five minutes less during the process, compared to the 20 W TurboPower sent by Motorola. In any case, both spend more than 1 hour and 40 minutes plugged in.

The A23 5G scores for superior autonomy.

Which has more battery?

None

Which recharges faster?

Galaxy A23 5G

Which lasts longer according to the TC battery test?

Galaxy A23 5G

Does it have wireless charging?

None

Cmera

Both smartphones come with a 50 MP main camera. Both one and the other present images that are right in color, contrast and HDR, in addition to not suffering much when taking pictures at night. Their macro lens does just the basics, due to the limitations of low resolution and lack of autofocus.

While Motorola is only in the double set at the rear, Samsung still places two other sensors in its middle. Ultrawide has its downfalls in sharpness, but it does provide a useful option for capturing more of the scenery. The blur already delivers a good job in the records with the portrait mode.

The Korean woman’s most versatile set gives her the point.

Best rear camera set

None

Best photos of the day

None

best night photos

None

most versatile set

Galaxy A23 5G

best ultrawide

Galaxy A23 5G

best telephoto lens

None

best macro

Both

best depth

Galaxy A23 5G

Photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

The camcorder of these devices is limited to Full HD resolution and does not exceed 30 fps. The Galaxy stands out in this regard due to the presence of optical stabilization, to have less shake in the videos than the Moto. The A23 5G still takes advantage of the rival by providing a more agile focus and a better quality stereo sound capture.

So we have another point for Korean.

Does it have optical stabilization?

Galaxy A23 5G

Better electronic stabilization?

Galaxy A23 5G

agile focus

Galaxy A23 5G

Does it record 4K at 30 fps?

None

Best audio capture

Galaxy A23 5G

best video quality

Galaxy A23 5G

Photos taken with the Motorola Moto G53

The two take good selfies during the day, not to mention their portrait mode that does not disable HDR. At night, the sharpness in both already shows a bigger drop. Overall, Moto ends up softening your photos a bit, which leaves the amount of detail lower than that found on the Galaxy. Front-facing recordings here are also no more than Full HD at 30 fps.

That is, we have a new point for the A23 5G.

Best front camera set

None

Front camera records in 4K?

None

best selfie

Galaxy A23 5G

priests

These cell phones were officially launched in the Brazilian market. The Galaxy A23 5G was available for BRL 2,300, more expensive than the BRL 1,900 initially charged for the Moto G53. In today’s retail, this difference no longer exists. Both one and the other can already be found for prices in the range of R$ 1,300.

Therefore, we closed the confrontation with one point for each.

Which had the best launch price in Brazil?

Moto G53

Which has the lowest current cost?

None

8
Hardware

7.7
Cost Benefcio

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

Compare

7.3
Hardware

7.6
Cost Benefcio

Motorola Moto G53

Compare

Done

In this clash between affordable intermediaries from different brands, Samsung got the better of Motorola, with a comfortable score, even though both are available at the same cost in the country.

The Galaxy A23 5G stands out for its larger screen with better definition, the battery with greater autonomy and the set of cameras, superior in rear photos, videos and selfies. The system offered by the Korean also has a greater longevity than the competitor.

The Moto G53 still had its merits. It’s the one that offers the most modern, compact and lightweight design, the most powerful stereo sound, and the fastest multitasking performance. Even so, if you want the most complete alternative, the rival will better suit your needs.

RESULT

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: 7 POINTS

  • Bigger screen with Full HD+ resolution
  • Longer lasting system
  • Battery with greater autonomy
  • Rear cameras with ultrawide and blur sensors
  • Videos with optical stabilization
  • Front camera with good selfies and portrait mode
  • Same price in current Brazilian market

Motorola Moto G53: 4 POINTS

  • More modern, compact and lightweight design
  • Stereo sound and more powerful
  • Faster multitasking performance
  • Same price in current Brazilian market

Do you believe the difference is so big between Galaxy and Moto? What characteristic of them attracts you the most? Don’t forget to comment with us in the space below.

(updated May 21, 2023 at 21:32)

1684717477
#Galaxy #A23 #Moto #G53 #trade #battery #cameras #sound #performance #Comparative

Leave a Replay