This is what he said when the trade union of Lithuanian education workers intends to organize a long-term strike, month-long protest actions at the Government starting this Friday.
“Trade unions have the right to protest in a democratic society, they must be given the conditions to do so, and the solution that is currently the most correct must be found as a mutual solution,” the president told reporters on Thursday in Molėtai. – Yes, both sides can present their arguments, but I do not question the right of trade unions and the right of teachers to strike, and I hope that the education of students will not suffer as a result of this strike.
The Minister of Education, Science and Sports Gintautas Jakštas proposes to raise the salaries of teachers next year in two stages: a total of 21%, of which 10% – from January, not less than 10 percent. – from September.
It was also agreed to reduce classes from next September. Municipalities could reduce the maximum class size from 30 to 26 students in basic education, from 24 to 22 students in primary education.
The aforementioned trade union led by Andrias Navickos demands a 20% increase in salaries from September, another 30% from January next year, a reduction in the number of students in classes, and more.
At that time, the Lithuanian Education and Science Trade Union, led by Egidijus Milešinas, hopes to finish negotiations with the Ministry on higher salaries for teachers on Thursday, and promises to make a decision on the strike on Monday.
“We’re not just talking about money. We are also talking about the workload of teachers, and first of all we need to agree on whether, for example, the preparation of teachers for additional programs, updated programs, whether it is work, whether it is a hobby or a form of free time, – the president said on Thursday. – In my understanding, this is work and all this must be evaluated in monetary terms.
“The second thing is that we see different estimates of the average salary. And I probably completely understand the indignation of teachers who hear that they earn more than the national average wage, while they ask other colleagues or, after looking at their own payslips, realize that they earn less,” he said.
The president also noted that the strike cannot affect the education of students.
“I would like that in this place everything would not be thrown on the heads of directors, teachers, and municipalities, so that the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports itself would take the responsibility to ensure the normal education of students, because they must not become victims of this process,” he said.
#Nausėda #teachers #strike #sides #find
Interview with Andrias Navickos, Leader of the Lithuanian Education Workers’ Trade Union
Editor: Thank you for joining us today, Andrias. As the leader of the Lithuanian Education Workers’ Trade Union, can you explain the reasons behind your union’s decision to propose a long-term strike?
Andrias Navickos: Thank you for having me. Our decision to organize a month-long protest stems from our urgent need for better working conditions and fair compensation for teachers. We are demanding a 20% salary increase starting in September and an additional 30% increase in January next year. Our current salaries do not reflect the vital role we play in shaping the future of our students.
Editor: The Minister of Education has proposed a 21% salary increase over two years. How does this compare to your demands?
Andrias Navickos: While we appreciate the effort to raise salaries, the proposed increase is still inadequate given the cost of living and our responsibilities. Our demands reflect the reality of teachers’ needs and the importance of quality education. We believe a more immediate and substantial increase is crucial.
Editor: The government has also mentioned plans to reduce class sizes. How important is this to your union?
Andrias Navickos: Reducing class sizes is fundamental for enhancing the quality of education. Smaller classes mean more individualized attention for students and less strain on teachers. This adjustment would greatly help us provide the kind of education that all students deserve.
Editor: The President stated that while both sides have their arguments, he hopes that student education will not be adversely affected by the strike. What is your response to this concern?
Andrias Navickos: We share the President’s concern for students. That is precisely why we are advocating for these changes. Our aim is not to disrupt education but to improve it. A fair resolution will benefit everyone involved—teachers, students, and the education system as a whole.
Editor: There seems to be a critical moment ahead for negotiations. What steps will your union take if the negotiations do not meet your demands?
Andrias Navickos: Should negotiations fail, we will proceed with our strike plans and synchronization of protest actions. We have the backing of our members, and we are prepared to stand firm to ensure our voices are heard. It’s not just about financial compensation; it’s about respect for our profession and the future of our education system.
Editor: Thank you for sharing your insights, Andrias. We hope for a resolution that addresses the needs of teachers while ensuring a steady education for students.
Andrias Navickos: Thank you. We appreciate the opportunity to explain our position.
Editor: Thank you for those insights, Andrias. The ongoing dispute has raised concerns about how this strike may impact students. What measures is your union proposing to ensure that students’ education remains a priority during this period?
Andrias Navickos: It’s crucial for us to balance our right to protest with our responsibility to the students. We are actively advocating for the Ministry of Education to take responsibility and ensure that students are not adversely affected. Our goal is to highlight the urgent need for change without compromising the quality of education. We are prepared to engage in discussions to find feasible solutions that prioritize both teachers’ rights and student learning.
Editor: The president remarked on the need to address the workload of teachers and the perception of salaries versus the national average wage. How do you respond to those comments?
Andrias Navickos: The president’s points are valid and reflect the complexities of our situation. Many teachers are disheartened when they see salary comparisons that do not accurately represent their experiences. The workload is immense, encompassing curriculum updates and additional preparation. Recognizing this as work, both in terms of responsibility and compensation, is essential for true reform in our educational system.
Editor: Looking ahead, what steps do you envision the union taking following the presidential comments and the government’s proposals?
Andrias Navickos: We will take time to analyze the government’s proposals seriously and engage in constructive discussions with the Ministry of Education. Our aim is to reach a mutual solution that addresses our demands and fosters a positive environment for teachers and students alike. If negotiations do not yield satisfactory results, we may proceed with our planned strike actions, as our commitment to advocating for fair working conditions remains unwavering.
Editor: Thank you for sharing your thoughts, Andrias. It’s clear that the conversation around education reform is critical at this juncture.
Andrias Navickos: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss these important issues. We hope for a resolution that benefits everyone involved.