Frustrated Student Faces Bill for Trying to Save Injured Robin

Frustrated Student Faces Bill for Trying to Save Injured Robin

The Curious Case of Lucia and the Robin: A Comedy of Errors

Picture this: Our heroine, Lucia Marina Bacca, stumbles upon an injured robin on the pavement and thinks, “Aww, little guy! Let’s save you!” But before you envision a heroic rescue akin to a Disney movie, let’s add a layer of bureaucracy and a hefty bill that would have even the most altruistic heart clutching its wallet!

A Robin, a Hope, and a Hefty Invoice

Now, you have to hand it to Lucia; she had hope that the little feathery friend would pull through with proper medical help. Unfortunately for her, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (let’s call them NFS Authority for brevity), responded with the kind of optimism that comes from a bureaucratic black hole: “Let nature take its course, and by the way, you can kill it yourself if you want!”

– “I didn’t have the heart to do it,” she said.

So, off to the vet she went! Spoiler alert: The bird didn’t make it—dying of a punctured lung before Robin’s version of a medical drama could begin. But the plot thickens!

The Invoice: A Featherweight Bill That Packs a Punch

Just when you thought this story couldn’t get any crazier, Lucia receives an invoice for NOK 2,520. Yes, you heard that right! That’s close to the price of a small car in some regions, at least if that car was advertised on a “buy here, pay later” scheme!

  • Killing: NOK 725
  • Consultation: NOK 1,360
  • Cremation and handling: NOK 291
  • Coffin: NOK 144

It’s enough to make you ask, “Did I sign up for a funeral service or a veterinary visit?” Lucia, a student no less, remarked that this cost felt like being punished for doing the right thing. Well, welcome to the real world, Lucia! Irony must be in the air like a morning breeze around here!

“I’m Sorry, Did I Just Pay to Kill a Bird?”

And here’s where it gets even richer: the law mandates that you must assist injured animals, but if you want to seek help, you should do it on your own dime. So, help but don’t expect help! Isn’t that just delightful? These regulations sound more like a cruel joke, unless of course, you’re into that kind of dark humor!

– “I’m sorry that this contributes to people perhaps thinking twice before they want to help other injured animals. Maybe I’ll be one of them,” Lucia lamented.

The NFS Authority and AniCura: Pointing Fingers and Shuffling Papers

A representative from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority weighed in, stating they offer some reimbursement for emergency aid but not for things like consultations or rehabilitation. Oh, the joy of paperwork! It’s not just animals that suffer; humans, too, must endure the all-time favorite dance of “let’s point fingers at one another.”

AniCura, the animal hospital, defended its actions, reiterating that they complied with the regulations. Can you hear that collective sigh? They said, “We did what we could!” which translated seems like, “Welcome to the system, but don’t expect a happy ending!”

The Takeaway: Can We Laugh Yet?

At the end of the day, this saga serves as a cheeky reminder of life’s unpredictability, especially in a society governed by red tape. If the message didn’t sink in well enough yet, here’s a nugget for you: If you’ve got a soft spot for birds, perhaps it’s best to let them take their chances in nature rather than get roped into the financial doghouse. Or just carry a load of cash, because let’s face it—if you want to help, you might as well be prepared to break the bank!

In the words of a great comedian, “The road to success is paved with unpaid invoices.” And, dear Lucia, may your next heroic act be less costly. Perhaps a sandwich shop visit? I hear the ones that come with a side of chips are quite good for the soul!

A few days ago, Lucia Marina Bacca, a compassionate student with a love for animals, discovered an injured robin lying helplessly on the ground.

The bird appeared to be in distress but was still breathing faintly and occasionally flitting its eyes open, giving Bacca a glimmer of hope for its survival.

– I had hope that it could manage with the right help, she says, reflecting her determination to save the fragile creature.

Bacca expressed her frustration with the financial burden of trying to help the injured bird, feeling disheartened by the situation.

– As a student, this is a large sum for me, and I feel punished for having tried to do the right thing, she says, highlighting the emotional toll of her efforts.

After finding the robin, Bacca reached out to the Norwegian Food Safety Authority for guidance. They informed her that, as the robin is not a protected species, it might be best to let nature take its course, advising her on the difficult decision she faced.

– They also said that I could kill him myself, which I didn’t have the heart to do, she recalls, expressing her reluctance to take such a drastic step.

Despite the challenging circumstances, Bacca decided to bring the bird to AniCura animal hospital in Stavanger, filled with hope for its recovery.

However, shortly after arriving at the clinic, she received an unfortunate phone call informing her that the robin had passed away due to a punctured lung, before the veterinarian could assess its condition, leaving her distraught.

Received an invoice

To her shock, Bacca was sent an invoice totaling NOK 2,520 for the services rendered:

  • Killing: NOK 725
  • Consultation: NOK 1,360
  • Cremation and handling: DKK 291
  • Coffin: DKK 144

This is the invoice Bacca was sent, unexpectedly adding financial stress to her emotional turmoil.

The law mandates a duty to assist animals that are visibly sick, injured, or helpless, compelling individuals to act when they encounter such situations.

Section 4 of the Animal Welfare Act

§ 4. Duty to assist

The provision stipulates the obligation to help animals that are obviously in need, including notifying the proper authorities when necessary.

It further clarifies that while euthanasia is permissible if an animal cannot recover, individuals should notify the owner or authorities if feasible.

Necessary expenses incurred while assisting injured animals are generally covered by the state, with certain exceptions for specific types of animals.

– I am sorry that this contributes to people perhaps thinking twice before they want to help other injured animals. Maybe I’ll be one of them.

The Norwegian Food Safety Authority provides support

Ane Ramskjær, a senior adviser at the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, elaborates on the regulations concerning remuneration for emergency assistance to animals.

The guidelines specify that while veterinarians are compensated for emergency care, this does not extend to ongoing treatment or rehabilitation, leaving individuals financially responsible for those costs.

If you do not euthanize, you must either take the animal to a vet, who euthanizes the animal at no cost to you, or call the police on 02800, it states.

Anicura: – Behaved correctly

Liv Krabbe Kyvåg, communications manager at Anicura Norway, confirmed that the clinic followed proper procedures in handling the situation and communicated clearly with Bacca.

– AniCura is adamant that we acted correctly in this situation, and did what we could to meet the pet owner’s wishes, she says, standing by the hospital’s decisions.

The hospital’s stance is that the Norwegian Food Authority only reimburses for emergency care and euthanasia of wild animals, emphasizing the necessity for clear communication about financial responsibility.

– But the actual consultation in the form of treatment in an attempt to save the bird is something that still has to be paid for by her, says Krabbe Kyvåg.

Published 29/10/2024, at 21.26

Leave a Replay