Muhammad Hammad, a poet from Lahore, has filed a personal complaint against actor Fahad Javed Hashmi of Ajoka Theater in the court of District Sessions Judge Lahore under Section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 for defamation.
In his complaint, Hamad has alleged that he was told by someone that Fahad Hashmi sat in the food street of Old Anarkali on January 23, 2022 and accused him in front of some people that the plaintiff had come to him through a recommendation in the past so that He should teach them poetry, writing and hosting a show. Not only this but Fahad Hashmi repeatedly repeated this in front of people while there is no truth in it. Plaintiff never went to Fahad in any connection.
Muhammad Hammad has also said that Fahad Hashmi has also accused him of sending his poetry to him for correction again and again, which is considered very derogatory in the circle of poets, but there is no truth in this. And Fahad Hashmi has tried to hurt his reputation by making such allegations against him.
Complainant Muhammad Hammad also wrote in his complaint that he is also an active member of Arbab Zouk constituency in Lahore, apart from that he writes columns in various newspapers and is also a radio jockey while also working as a journalist in a daily newspaper.
He also claimed that when he tried to inquire about the matter from Fahad through WhatsApp, Fahad started shouting at him and also said that poets are disgraceful people of this society and in front of me poets and writers No times.
Hamad said in his complaint that all this has caused him mental torture to such an extent that he has suffered from depression and when he goes to his friends or literary gatherings he has to clean himself up. Therefore, under Section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860, Fahad Hashmi should be punished.
We contacted Muhammad Hamad to get more details from him but he refused to tell Independent Urdu anything about the case.
Interestingly, Muhammad Hammad submitted this complaint in the court in February 2022.
On the other hand, Fahad Hashmi told Independent Urdu that he came to know about the complaint filed against him in the court in August when a non-bailable arrest warrant was issued against him and he received a call from the police station. According to Fahad, he did not receive any court notice earlier. Later he came to know that the court notices were being sent to a wrong address.
He said that he went to the court for the hearing of the case for the first time on September 20 as per the court order, after which some seniors and members of the Arbab Zouk constituency suggested that the problem should be resolved by sitting down and discussing among themselves. . But in the meantime, the second hearing of the case came up for which I could not go to the court and the next date for the hearing was given which was 16th November.
“On that day I was charged and the judge asked me to submit the bail bond and fixed November 18 as the trial date. 18 when I appeared in court and requested that the record of the case be provided to me so that I could advocate. The honorable judge asked me to get the case file from the office and when I came out of the court office, six to seven people including lawyers attacked me and beat me so much that my Injured the face.’
“Hamad has complained that I have criticized him, which I have not done,” says Fahad. Still, I say yes, if I did, criticism is not a crime. I am an educated person working in good institutions now I am also acting for mainstream media. Now they have accused me, I will follow the case fully, but what happened in court happened to me and later I was also threatened.’
He said that he also has the medico-legal record of that day and he had also submitted the report of the torture in the concerned police station, a copy of which is also with him.
This section contains related reference points (Related Nodes field).
He said that ‘During the appearance, the plaintiff i.e. Hamad told me that there is money involved in his case, so I should write the money and an apology letter, on which I told him that I have never deliberately hurt anyone. I didn’t say anything against him but if you feel that something like that happened to me unintentionally, then I am sorry and I also told him to reconcile. But they refused.’
While the other plaintiff, Muhammad Hamad, refused to divulge details of the case to Independent Urdu, he denied that he or any of his accomplices tortured Fahad outside the court. Hamad also denied that Fahad had tried to reconcile with him.
In this regard, Independent Urdu contacted Farah Rizvi, Secretary of Arbab Zouk Constituency. Farah said that according to his records, no person named Muhammad Hamad is a member of Arbab Zouk Lahore. He also said that after consultation with the Arbab Zouk Constituency Council, a condemnation resolution was also presented in the weekly meeting of the constituency on November 20, which was unanimously approved by the members present and endorsed by the Jalsa President Abdul Waheed. of
Circle Secretary Farah Rizvi further said that Arbab Zouk Circle is against all forms of violence and believes in resolving issues between people through understanding.
Amir Faraz, the former secretary of Arbab Zouk constituency, who was elected many times, while talking to Independent Urdu, said that there has definitely been a lawsuit regarding the elections of Arbab Zouk constituency, but this kind of case has never passed before his eyes. .
After perusal of the case file, Independent Urdu confirmed that the Hon’ble Court vide its order dated 16th November 2022 initiated the trial and framed the charge sheet against the accused Fahad on apparent reasonable grounds.
However, due to the lack of progress in the hearing scheduled for November 30, 2022, the court decided to hear the case on January 11, 2023.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘2494823637234887’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
#dispute #poet #actor #Lahore #reach #court
2024-09-12 06:03:12
Table of Contents
Title: Poet Muhammad Hammad Files Defamation Case against Actor Fahad Javed Hashmi of Ajoka Theater
Meta Description: A poet from Lahore, Muhammad Hammad, has filed a defamation case against actor Fahad Javed Hashmi of Ajoka Theater under Section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860.
Keywords: Muhammad Hammad, Fahad Javed Hashmi, Ajoka Theater, Defamation Case, Section 500 Pakistan Penal Code 1860, Lahore, Pakistan
Content:
In a shocking turn of events, Muhammad Hammad, a poet from Lahore, has filed a personal complaint against actor Fahad Javed Hashmi of Ajoka Theater in the court of District Sessions Judge Lahore under Section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 for defamation. According to Hammad’s complaint, Fahad Hashmi allegedly made false and derogatory remarks about him at a food street in Old Anarkali on January 23, 2022, in front of several people.
Hammad alleges that Fahad claimed he had come to him seeking guidance on poetry, writing, and hosting a show, which Hammad denies. The poet also accuses Fahad of repeatedly making these false claims, causing damage to his reputation. Moreover, Fahad is alleged to have accused Hammad of sending his poetry for corrections, which is considered a grave insult in the literary circle.
In his complaint, Hammad also mentions that he is an active member of the Arbab Zouk constituency in Lahore, a columnist for various newspapers, and a radio jockey. He claims that when he confronted Fahad about the matter via WhatsApp, Fahad shouted at him and made derogatory remarks about poets and writers.
As a result of Fahad’s actions, Hammad claims to have suffered mental torture, depression, and a loss of reputation among his friends and literary circles. He is seeking punishment for Fahad under Section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860.
However, when contacted by Independent Urdu, Fahad Hashmi denied the allegations, stating that he came to know about the complaint only in August 2022 when a non-bailable arrest warrant was issued against him. Fahad alleges that he did not receive any prior court notices and that the court notices were sent to a wrong address.
Fahad also claimed that he was attacked and beaten by six to seven people, including lawyers, outside the court on November 16, 2022, and has a medico-legal record to support his claim. He denies making any derogatory remarks about Hammad and is willing to reconcile if he unintentionally hurt the poet’s feelings.
In response to Fahad’s allegations, Hammad denied any involvement in the attack and refused to provide further details about the case. Independent Urdu also contacted Farah Riz
Defamation Case: Muhammad Hammad Accuses Fahad Hashmi of Defamation, But What’s the Truth?
In a shocking turn of events, Muhammad Hammad, a poet from Lahore, has filed a personal complaint against actor Fahad Javed Hashmi of Ajoka Theater in the court of District Sessions Judge Lahore under Section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 for defamation. The complaint, which was submitted in February 2022, alleges that Fahad Hashmi made derogatory remarks about Muhammad Hammad in front of people, causing him mental torture and damaging his reputation.
According to Muhammad Hammad’s complaint, Fahad Hashmi accused him of coming to him for poetry and writing lessons, which is not true. Fahad Hashmi also allegedly said that Muhammad Hammad sent his poetry to him for correction numerous times, which is considered derogatory in the circle of poets. When Muhammad Hammad confronted Fahad Hashmi about the matter through WhatsApp, Fahad started shouting at him and made derogatory comments about poets and writers.
Muhammad Hammad, who is an active member of the Arbab Zouk constituency in Lahore, writes columns for various newspapers, and works as a radio jockey and journalist, claims that Fahad Hashmi’s actions have caused him depression and mental torture. He is seeking punishment for Fahad Hashmi under Section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860.
However, Fahad Hashmi has denied all the allegations made by Muhammad Hammad. He claims that he did not receive any court notice earlier and only came to know about the complaint when a non-bailable arrest warrant was issued against him in August 2022. Fahad Hashmi also alleges that he was attacked by six to seven people, including lawyers, when he went to the court for the hearing of the case on November 18, 2022.
Fahad Hashmi has said that he will follow the case fully and has already submitted a medico-legal record of the torture he suffered during the attack. He has also questioned why Muhammad Hammad would ask him to write an apology letter and pay money to settle the case.
The case raises important questions about the nature of defamation and the limits of freedom of speech. While Muhammad Hammad has the right to protect his reputation, Fahad Hashmi also has the right to express his opinions and criticize others. The case will likely be closely watched by legal experts and poetry enthusiasts alike.
Other Notable Figures with the Name Hammad
Interestingly, there are several notable figures with the name Hammad, including Fahad Saleem, Zineb Riboua, Mohamed Azmi Hassali, Muhammad Hammad Butt, and Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi, who are researchers and authors in the field of medicine [1]. Additionally, there are over 100 professionals named “Hammad Hashmi” on LinkedIn [2].
It is also worth noting that Fahad Hashmi is not to be confused with Fahad Hashmi, who was arrested in 2003 and held in solitary confinement for three years before pleading guilty to one count of material support to a foreign terrorist organization in 2010 <a href="https://www.democracynow.org/2010/4/28/after3yearsinpretrial_solitary”>[3].
As the case between Muhammad Hammad and Fahad Hashmi unfolds, it will be important to stay vigilant and separate fact from fiction. Only time will tell what really happened between these two individuals.
