2024-09-16 10:41:19
The English championship ogre and European giant, Manchester City, must respond from Monday and for several weeks to suspicions of financial misconduct that arose after the arrival of the Emirati owner in 2008. Explanations.
And “trial“without court
The Premier League, the world’s most-watched league, believes Manchester City knowingly circumvented financial rules established between 2009 and 2018 to boost its sporting ambitions. During this period, the “Citizens” have won the championship three times. They have collected multiple titles since then, in England (six of the last seven Premier League titles) and in Europe (the Champions League in 2023). After building its indictment case, the Premier League referred the club from the north of England to an independent commission in February 2023.
The latter carried out an in-depth examination of the facts alleged before being able to begin the hearing of the two parties, Monday behind closed doors, in a place unknown to the general public. Three people, sworn to secrecy, make up the panel. They were appointed by Murray Rosen, the chairman of the Premier League’s judicial committee. The battle through interposed lawyers should last ten weeks, according to the British press which has given it a nickname: “the sports trial of the century” (sport’s trial of the century).
Verdict expected in 2025
The commission will take the time to examine the arguments of each side before making its decision, probably at the beginning of 2025 according to media estimates.
The possibility of an appeal, on the part of “Man City” or the Premier League, pushes the epilogue back to several weeks, or even months. In this scenario, an appeal committee would be set up. No appeal is permitted to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The CAS is the body that invalidated the two-year suspension from all European competitions handed down to Manchester City in 2020 for non-compliance with the rules of financial fair play.
What suspicions weigh on City?
Specifically, the club faces 115 indictments: 80 financial offenses (period 2009-2018) and 35 additional ones for an alleged lack of cooperation in the investigation.
According to the Premier League, the “Citizens“would have violated the League’s regulations requiring the provision”in good faith” d'”accurate financial information giving a true and fair view of the club’s financial situation“, bought in 2008 by the Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG) consortium, owned by Sheikh Mansour.
The holding company is suspected of having hidden direct financial investments by inflating sponsorship revenues from Etihad, the Emirati airline and main partner of the club (shirt sponsor and stadium naming), in order to circumvent the rules.
Manchester City must also answer for alleged violations of UEFA’s Financial Fair Play (2013-2018 period) and the Premier League (2015-2018). The independent committee must also determine whether Roberto Mancini, one of the former coaches, received undeclared salary supplements, a practice that could also have benefited some players.
1726491158
#simple #reprimand #exclusion #championship #risks #Manchester #City #face #Premier #League
What are the specific allegations of financial misconduct against Manchester City?
Table of Contents
- 1 What are the specific allegations of financial misconduct against Manchester City?
- 2 To confidentiality, will evaluate the evidence and testimony presented by both the Premier League and Manchester City. The outcome could have significant ramifications for the club’s future and the wider football landscape.
Manchester City Faces Trial by Fire: Responding to Allegations of Financial Misconduct
The football world is abuzz with the news that Manchester City, the English championship giant and European powerhouse, is set to face an independent commission to respond to allegations of financial misconduct that date back to 2008. The club, owned by the Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG) consortium, is accused of knowingly circumventing financial rules established between 2009 and 2018 to boost its sporting ambitions. The Premier League, the world’s most-watched league, has referred the club to an independent commission, which will conduct an in-depth examination of the facts alleged before commencing the hearing of the two parties.
The Allegations: A Web of Deceit?
At the heart of the allegations lies the suspicion that Manchester City provided misleading financial information to the Premier League, violating the League’s regulations that require clubs to provide accurate financial data that gives a true and fair view of their financial situation. The Premier League has launched 115 indictments against the club, including 80 financial offenses and 35 additional ones for alleged lack of cooperation in the investigation.
The holding company, owned by Sheikh Mansour, is suspected of having hidden direct financial injections into the club, allowing Manchester City to flout Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations and gain an unfair advantage over its competitors. FFP rules are designed to ensure that clubs operate within their means, promoting sustainability and fair competition in the sport.
A Trial Without a Court
The hearing, scheduled to begin on September 16, 2024, will take place behind closed doors in an undisclosed location. A three-member panel, sworn to secrecy, will hear arguments from both parties over a period of ten weeks. The battle, dubbed “the sports trial of the century” by the British press, promises to be a intense and dramatic affair.
The Verdict: Justice Delayed?
The commission will take the time to examine the arguments of each side before making its decision, which is expected to be handed down in early 2025, according to media estimates. However, the possibility of an appeal by either party could push the epilogue back by several weeks or even months. In such a scenario, an appeal committee would be set up to review the decision.
What’s at Stake?
The consequences of a guilty verdict could be severe. Manchester City could face a range of penalties, including point deductions, fines, or even expulsion from the Premier League. The reputational damage could also be significant, tainting the club’s hard-won success on the pitch.
the allegations of financial misconduct against Manchester City have sent shockwaves through the football world. As the club faces the music, one thing is certain – the outcome of this trial will have far-reaching implications for the sport, and the verdict of the independent commission will be eagerly awaited by fans and pundits alike.
Keywords: Manchester City, Premier League, Financial Misconduct, Allegations, Independent Commission, Trial, Financial Fair Play, Sheikh Mansour, Abu Dhabi United Group, Football.
To confidentiality, will evaluate the evidence and testimony presented by both the Premier League and Manchester City. The outcome could have significant ramifications for the club’s future and the wider football landscape.
Here is a comprehensive and SEO-optimized article on the topic:
Manchester City Faces Trial by Fire: Responding to Allegations of Financial Misconduct
The football world is abuzz with the news that Manchester City, the English championship giant and European powerhouse, is set to face an independent commission to respond to allegations of financial misconduct that date back to 2008. The club, owned by the Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG) consortium, is accused of knowingly circumventing financial rules established between 2009 and 2018 to boost its sporting ambitions.
The Allegations: A Web of Deceit?
At the heart of the allegations lies the suspicion that Manchester City provided misleading financial information to the Premier League, violating the League’s regulations that require clubs to provide accurate financial data that gives a true and fair view of their financial situation. The Premier League has launched 115 indictments against the club, including 80 financial offenses and 35 additional ones for alleged lack of cooperation in the investigation.
A Trial Without a Court
The hearing, scheduled to begin on September 16, 2024, will take place behind closed doors in an undisclosed location. A three-member panel, sworn
