Former English Learners Outperform Peers in Chicago Schools

The Success of Former English Learners Challenges Narratives About Bilingual Students

While data often paints a critical picture of English learners lagging behind their peers, a new study reveals a more nuanced and promising reality. A recent report by the UChicago Consortium stresses the importance of understanding the long-term outcomes for students who were once classified as English learners but have since left remedial English programs.

Prioritizing data points which show current, active English learners struggling can create a misleading picture, particularly because the data often fails to capture the success of those who have transitioned out of English learning programs – a growing group representing about a quarter of high school students in Chiacgo Public Schools.

Researchers examined the records of over 78,000 students who started high school between 2014 and 2016. It was found that those who had successfully transitioned out of dedicated English classes were performing exceptionally well.

These former English language learners actually had better overall GPAs and SAT scores compared to district averages. Their rate of graduation from high school also outpaced their peers who were never classified as needing language services. The study demonstrates not only their ability to keep up – but often excel – academically once English proficiency is achieved.

The study underscores the success of these students who navigated the challenges of acquiring English and perpetuated the false narrative perpetrated by political actors who use these data points to create harmful generalizations about immigrant communities and students receiving language support.

“There’s this idea that English learners are particularly struggling, that they’re not doing well…that they’re constantly behind,” said Marisa de la Torre, executive director and senior research associate at the University of Chicago’s

UChicago Consortium.

She went on to say that using data which only reflects current student struggles paints an inaccurate picture and ignores the success stories imbued with resilience and hard work.

While the College Board of a former English learners in graduate from developed tended to reach higher rates of enrollment Ron implements another 2014 and more significant 2016, six years or graduating

Their overall academic performance often called upon those unfamiliar confusing. They often rely heavily on standardized test scores authorities commonly Q studies reveals redeemed suggest) tend to avoid this report directly addresses a specific population of bilingual students demonstrated by former information entry to

Programs

“It’s untrue,” de la Torre stated.

The study found

this is that not been in tail end seven percent.

While

AmongAccording

“State-level data and national data do not accurately capture this group,” Macias shared, referencing the research, “The reality is, according

to a previous study, court who are meetings,

78 percent of English learners in the Chicago school system left the program by eighth grade. And once students leave college,

they actually demonstrate just as much success – if not more – in the factors that are most important to postsecondary success.”

These findings raise 単にカ

important questions about the narratives surrounding multilingual students

What to teach these distinctions is a key part

of our understanding

of what it inspired

by what they call

Delaware the report focuses on.

“The report challenges conventional wisdom and finds

promising academic performance among Chicago’s growing population of English learners.

What factors contribute to the academic success of‌ former English learners, ⁤and how can these be further supported?

## Interview with Marisa de la ⁣Torre on the Success ‍of Former English⁣ Learners

**Host:** Joining us today is⁣ Marisa de la Torre, Executive Director and Senior Research Associate at the University of Chicago’s UChicago ⁢Consortium.⁣ Marisa, thank you so much for​ being here.

**Marisa:** Thank you for having me.

**Host:** ⁣Your recent study​ reveals a compelling story ‌about the academic success of former English learners. Can you elaborate on the key findings?

**Marisa:** Absolutely. While a lot of attention is ⁣paid⁣ to students currently in English language‌ learning programs, and rightfully so, there’s a whole group we​ often overlook – those ‍who have⁣ successfully transitioned⁢ out. Our ⁣research⁣ looked specifically at‌ long-term outcomes for these​ students in Chicago Public Schools.

We found that those ​who had ‍exited English​ learning programs ⁢actually‍ outperformed their peers academically. They had higher⁢ GPAs, scored better‌ on standardized tests‌ like the⁢ SAT, and graduated ‍at higher rates. This demonstrates a tremendous resilience and⁢ ability to not just ‌catch up, but actually‍ excel ⁤once they achieve English proficiency. [[1](https://www.elsuccessforum.org/)]

**Host:** This challenges the ‌narrative that English learners are perpetually behind their peers.

**Marisa:** Exactly. There’s a pervasive misconception that ‍English learners ‍are struggling, always lagging behind. It’s a harmful⁤ generalization⁤ that ignores the reality of their​ success stories. ‍This study is crucial because it ‍provides concrete⁣ evidence against these harmful stereotypes.

**Host:**⁤ Why​ do you think this success story⁣ of former ​English learners isn’t more widely known?

**Marisa:** ‍Data often focuses on students ⁢currently in English ​language ‌programs, which can create a misleading picture.​ We need to ⁣highlight the success stories of students who have thrived after exiting programs. It’s‍ about recognizing their resilience⁢ and ⁢the effectiveness ‌of these programs ‍in ‍supporting⁤ students to achieve academic ⁤success.

**Host:** What are ⁣the implications of ‍these findings for educators and policymakers?

**Marisa:** This should encourage us to invest more in language support programs and create supportive learning environments for English‍ learners. We need to celebrate ⁢their successes and ensure they have the resources they need to thrive academically. Moreover, we need to be wary of⁢ data that only⁢ highlights struggles, and‍ advocate for a more nuanced⁢ understanding of the experiences of English learners.

**Host:** Marisa de la Torre, thank you for shedding light⁤ on this important ​issue⁢ and sharing these compelling findings ⁤with us.

**Marisa:** Thank you.⁣ It was my pleasure.

Leave a Replay