That is what the Courtroom of Attraction of Lithuania selected Thursday. The primary-instance courtroom awarded half the quantity – over 327,000. euros.
As reported by the Courtroom of Attraction of Lithuania, the request of the insurance coverage firm “Gjensidige” was partially granted, it requested to award virtually 900 thousand. euros.
The fireplace within the monastery was brought on by the above-mentioned corporations’ improperly carried out actions in designing, putting in the chimney, improperly performing development upkeep and later unfold to the church constructing. The improper efficiency of the duties of the pinnacle of the Tytuvėnai Pilgrim Middle additionally contributed to the accident – he disconnected the hearth alarm that had tripped within the monastery, reloaded it and didn’t verify why it had tripped.
The panel of judges of the Courtroom of Attraction famous that each the inappropriate actions of the Tradition Infrastructure Middle and the Agromena lt firm, in addition to the conduct of the pinnacle of the Tytuvėnai Pilgrim Middle who turned off the alarm, decided that the hearth broke out each within the monastery constructing and within the church, however the duty of those entities for the injury triggered is completely different .
In keeping with the evaluation of the panel of judges, “Agromena lt” and the Tradition Infrastructure Middle should collectively compensate “Gjensidige” for 70 %. all quantities paid for the insured occasion, and the Tytuvėnai Pilgrims Middle – 30 %.
This determination of the Courtroom of Attraction of Lithuania in a civil case got here into impact on the day of its adoption, however it may be appealed to the Supreme Courtroom of Lithuania inside three months.
Throughout a fireplace in January 2012, 60 reveals – artwork and cultural values - have been destroyed and broken within the exposition room of the Tytuvėnai St. Bernard Monastery, and the constructing of the monastery was broken.
Then 1.8 million have been made. EUR injury, destroyed and broken vital cultural values.
At the moment, the pinnacle of the Tytuvėnai Pilgrim Middle was additionally charged with legal legal responsibility – he was convicted for turning off the alarm system and thus contributing to the unfold of the hearth. Different individuals – the technical supervisor of the constructing, the development supervisor, the mission supervisor and the mission implementation supervisor – prevented legal legal responsibility following the statute of limitations expired.
Following the choice of the Supreme Courtroom in December 2017, Pranas Jurkaitis, the previous head of the Tytuvėnai pilgrim middle, was discovered responsible of the hearth. He was sentenced to at least one yr in jail, suspended for one and a half years.
#hearth #ensemble #Tytuvėnai #monastery #thousand #ordered #paid #euros
2024-05-20 15:59:32