Lin Zhijian, the DPP mayoral candidate for Taoyuan, was deeply involved in the dissertation scandal. The outside world believed that he should go to the National Taiwan University Lunhui to make it clear and clear. And Lin yesterday (July 31) explained why he did not attend the National Taiwan University Lun Association, because he regretted that the convener, Dean Su Hongda, had not tried the case first, and suggested that the convener should avoid it. Unfortunately, there was no way to get a response. After Lin’s explanation came to light, netizens debated, and some people criticized “I went to the National Taiwan University Lunhui briefing and asked three questions, but of course I didn’t dare to go.”
Lin Zhijian pointed out that he had hoped that the Taiwan University Lun Society would uphold the school’s independence and judge this incident fairly and impartially. It is very regrettable that Dean Su Hongda, the convener of the Academic Lun Association, did not judge beforehand on this matter, and was biased. After researching with lawyers, I suggested that the convener should avoid it, but unfortunately there was no way to get a response.
Lin Zhijian further said that according to the regulations of the Scholars Association, there are two ways to reply to the Scholars Association, one is to explain in person, and the other is to write in writing. Written form to present the information to the Scholars Association.
In this regard, many netizens discussed it under the related videos of “Zhongshi News Network” and related reports of “Yahoo News”, and there were more than 200 comments. I was surprised when he dared to go, hahaha”, “The more you draw, the more dark you are, the more you drag the shed”, “You should draw the target first and then shoot the arrow”, “You have beaten the election; “, “It’s an excuse”.
