Fernando Véjar denounced insults by Gioino and aggression by the Ñublense coordinator in Chillán

After the controversial duel between Ñublense and Catholic University in the “Nelson Oyarzún” of Chillán, the judge Fernando Véjar denounced in his report insults by Sergio Gioino, president of the red box, along with an attack by a collaborator after the final whistle.

In the document released by the ANFP, as is customary on each date, the arbitrator stated that Gioino waited for them outside the dressing room, where he began to yell “aggressively and defiantly, saying: “You are a mess, your mother’s shell, you stole from us asshole thief” (sic).

In addition, it was written that security intervention was required to control the obfuscated local leader.

On the other hand, Francisco Mardones, coordinator of the “Red Devils”, pushed Véjar “aggressively from behind”when he was about to enter the locker room, in full view of the ANFP Security Chief and the Director on duty in charge of the comparison.

Along with this, the throwing of “several objects (coins and glasses with liquids) towards where the fourth referee was” was also reported at minute 90+6′, events that “were repeated when the referee team left.

Already in what happened during football, explanations were given for the three reds in Ñublense. Nicolás Salazar left at 54 ‘for “being guilty of violent conduct”by “impacting the back of a player who was on the ground” and stepping on his heel.

At 81′, Raimundo Rebolledo saw the card for double reprimand, because he had “unsportsmanlike conduct, cutting off a promising attack by holding an opponent by the shirt. While, Juan Leiva was sent off at 90+5′ for “using offensive language and gestures of the same nature”specifically applause near the referee’s face.

Related Articles:  Understanding High-Pressure Material Changes: Insights into Stars and Planets

Finally, the colored cardboard for the DT was detailed Jaime García (90+5′): “Inadequate conduct within the bank; He deliberately leaves his technical area to disapprove of the place where the fourth referee was.”

Review the report of referee Véjar:

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.