2024-08-27 01:26:09
2024.08.27 05:28 Taipei time
Cai Biru (2nd from right in front) was accused of splitting personnel expenses into more than 300 transportation expenses to report. Some Ke fans criticized her in a private social group: “Before you attack others when you see Hunter Xinxi, wipe your own butt first.” Okay?” The picture shows Tsai’s election campaign last year.
Release time: 2024.08.27 05:28 Taipei time
Update time: 2024.08.27 05:29 Taipei time
Wen PhotographyControl Yuancover storyTaiwan People’s Partypolitical contributionsKe WenzhedeclareCai Biru
This magazine’s investigation revealed that following the People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je’s scandal involving fake accounts, Taichung City Government consultant Cai Biru, who is regarded as the founding mother of the People’s Party, was also exposed in the political donation account for last year’s legislative election, involving more than 300 transportation expenses. Declaring personnel expenses in the name of debit accounts, totaling more than one million yuan in expenditures, involves false declarations. In addition to being suspected of forging documents and circumventing labor and health insurance, the recipients may also be guilty of tax evasion. Comparing the accounts one by one, this magazine found that Cai Biru’s first form of false declaration was to pay a fixed amount of transportation expenses to multiple people in succession. People familiar with the matter even ridiculed that the amount of transportation expenses declared was so neat, “Is there any?” Obsessive-compulsive disorder”.
Nearly 87% of Cai Biru’s transportation expenses were reported in the name of a person, but there was no personnel expenses. Among them, Chen A’s 106 transportation expenses of 2,000 yuan totaled 212,000 yuan. Excluding weekends, he was paid almost every day. It was like Daily wages. (Refer to the prison website)
The most exaggerated case is A. Cai Biru paid him a fixed transportation fee of NT$2,000 almost every day on working days. From August 10 last year to the day before the voting on January 12 this year, there were a total of 106 transactions totaling NT$212,000. Among them, From August to December last year, they were NT$32,000, NT$42,000, NT$40,000, NT$44,000, and NT$38,000 respectively, with an average of nearly NT$40,000 per month. The number of days A applied for transportation expenses even differed from The working days announced in the calendar of the General Office of Personnel and Administration of the Executive Yuan are almost the same. As for the polling day, although the month is less than one month old, they still received 8 transportation expenses totaling 16,000 yuan.
Not only A, from October last year to January this year, Cai Biru paid E and F 47 transportation expenses each with a single fixed amount of 3,000 yuan every 1 or 2 days for 4 consecutive months. The payment dates for the two people were only different on 4 days. The remaining 43 days are all the same, and the total amount received in a single month is also exactly the same. For example, both of them received NT$48,000 in October, NT$39,000 in November, and NT$42,000 in December. Before the voting day in January, they both received NT$48,000. After receiving 12,000 yuan, the total transportation expenses paid by Cai to E and F over the past three months were exactly the same, 141,000 yuan each. It is suspected that these transportation expenses may all be work remuneration.
The amount of transportation expenses declared by Cai Biru was strangely neat. In October last year, he paid Chen F a sum of 3,000 yuan in transportation expenses on odd-numbered days, totaling 48,000 yuan in a single month. (Refer to the prison website)
In addition, from August last year to January this year, Cai Biru also paid D a total of 50 payments of a fixed amount of 3,000 yuan in transportation expenses in more than five months from August last year to January this year. Among them, in October and December last year, the transportation expenses for a single person in a single month were amounting to NT$33,000. As for last November, Cai paid I and J a fixed transportation fee of NT$2,000 each for 16 consecutive days. The two of them received a total of NT$32,000 each in a single month. On December 8, 10, and 12 last year, every two He paid H a one-time transportation fee of NT$3,000 on the same day, a total of 11 transactions totaling NT$33,000.
The second form of Cai She’s false accounting is to pay a high amount of money to a specific person in a single month, also in the name of transportation expenses. For example, since August last year, Cai has paid a fixed amount of 40,000 yuan in transportation expenses every month. B, who once served as the People’s Party’s Taichung City Councilor Election Policy Advisor, has a total of 200,000 for 5 consecutive months.
Cai Biru was involved in declaring personnel expenses by dividing transportation expenses. Some Ke fans privately ridiculed the amount of transportation expenses in the community as “so tidy” and “does he have obsessive-compulsive disorder”. (provided by readers)
This magazine examines the transportation expenses of other candidates. Most of the expenditure declaration columns include transportation, fuel, parking fees, or travel and accommodation expenses. The objects of expenditure are listed on high-speed rail, Taiwan Railway, etc., or CNPC and other gas stations, taxis, parking lots, etc., but nearly 87% of Cai’s transportation expenses were paid to 13 specific people. Each person paid almost a fixed amount, which is obviously not like actual reimbursement. Ke fans who knew it even On the online community, he ridiculed “the neat transportation fees” and “does Biru have obsessive-compulsive disorder”; at the same time, the frequency of payment of transportation fees per person is also quite high, with the same person paying a single payment of 2,000 or 3,000 in almost one or two days. Yuan, and even paid a single payment of 40,000 to 50,000 yuan to a specific person. However, the presidential-level campaign team still has travel needs such as cross-district auxiliary elections. It is really contrary to common sense for Tsai’s first constituency in Taichung.
According to our investigation, there are two contradictions in Cai Biru’s transportation declaration. First, if it is not wages, are there any invoices or documents for actual reimbursement? Why can every transportation fee be so neat? Second, if the transportation expenses are not actually reimbursed, which may involve salary split declaration, should we add labor and health insurance for employees? According to this year’s comprehensive income tax filing regulations, the tax exemption for single office workers without immediate dependents is NT$423,000. That is, anyone with a monthly income of more than NT$55,250 will be taxed, but Cong Cai’s monthly payment of A, Judging from the amount of transportation expenses for B, E, F, etc., it is very likely that the recipients of these amounts will be involved in tax evasion.
Update time |2024.08.27 05:29 Taipei time
Further reading
More content is welcome Mirror Weekly print magazine,Mirror Weekly Digital Subscription,Learn about content licensing.
1724723905
#False #account #burned #Cai #Biru #1Transportation #expenses #neat #obsessivecompulsive #disorder #revealed #Cai #Biru #involved #false #declarations #violated #laws #Mirror #Media
