Explosive Showdown: Madhya Pradesh SDM Threatens Lawyer Amid Courtroom Dispute

Rewa News: In Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh, a dispute arose between an SDM and a lawyer over a civil case that escalated to the point where the SDM threatened the advocate, saying, “This is my court, you can do whatever you want.” In response to this entire dispute, the advocates submitted a memorandum against the SDM to the division commissioner and collector. This entire incident has gone viral on social media.

It is reported that there is a land dispute between Pawan Kumar and Jitendra Kumar, which is being heard under the sub-divisional officer of Tyothar. The dispute began when lawyer Rajendra Gautam arrived at the SDM office at 2 PM during the hearing.

Dispute Arising from Late Arrival
In fact, SDM Sanjay Kumar Jain claimed that he had been sitting since 12:00 PM, while the lawyer argued that their hearing was scheduled for 2:00 PM, which is why he arrived at that time. This disagreement gradually escalated.

During this time, a video was also recorded by the SDM, while another person present in the SDM court filmed the entire incident. This video has gone viral on social media. During this dispute, other advocates also arrived in support of Rajendra Gautam, further intensifying the commotion.

Complaint to Administrative Officials
Regarding this entire dispute, the lawyers have lodged a complaint against SDM Sanjay Kumar Jain to the division commissioner and collector. They allege that the SDM uses disrespectful language to exert pressure on advocates. The lawyers have demanded action against the SDM.

On the other hand, the Chief Minister stated that lawyer Gautam initiated the dispute by speaking in a threatening tone and in a loud voice in court.

Dispute Started Over Extension of Date
The conflict between the SDM and the lawyer began when the SDM extended the date due to the lawyer’s absence at the scheduled time in court. Advocate Rajendra Gautam claimed that he was given a time of 2 PM, so he arrived at court at that time, but the SDM had already postponed the date. The advocate stated that delays in justice are also considered a form of injustice, causing his client difficulties due to repeated extensions.

Also Read: Major Incident at Government School in Narsinghpur, Ceiling Plaster Fell During Class, 9 Students Injured

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Articles:

Table of Contents