Custody is ultimately awarded to the woman. (Schematic / taken from pixabay)
After a man surnamed Zhang in mainland China divorced his wife, he raised the child alone for many years. He didn’t expect the last child to be his. What’s worse, the court awarded custody to the biological mother. His appeal was still dismissed, and the woman was eventually granted custody.
According to the Southern Metropolis Daily, a Chinese media, the man surnamed Zhang and Xiaohong (a pseudonym) registered their marriage on August 28, 2017, and then welcomed their baby son on October 18 of the same year; unexpectedly, on December 18 of the following year, the couple married Divorce and divorce registration due to emotional breakdown, the child is raised by the man, and Xiaohong has the right to visit.
However, followingward, the two sides quarreled over the issue of visiting the children. Xiaohong said that during her cohabitation with Zhang Nan, she had an improper relationship with a man surnamed Li. After a paternity test, it was confirmed that her son was Li Nan’s child, not Zhang Nan’s, so she asked to change the custody relationship. After Zhang Nan found out, although he was shocked, he was still reluctant to give up custody of his son. He believes that he takes good care of his son and has deep feelings for him, and he doesn’t mind that the child is not his own.
However, following the trial, the judge said that before the DNA results were released, Zhang Nan mistakenly believed that he was the biological father of the child and raised the child with all his heart, which was a fraudulent parenting relationship. Parenting disadvantageous situations. The judge pointed out that Zhang Nan claimed that he had custody of the child, which had no factual and legal basis. The child should be raised by his biological mother, which would be more beneficial to future education and life, so the child was awarded to the woman.
Zhang Nan refused to accept and appealed, and the Nanchang Intermediate People’s Court upheld the original judgment in the second instance. After the news was exposed, many people commented, “This kind of judgment is unpopular”, “Even though you raised it with all your heart, it will not be awarded to you”, “So what did the man get with so much money and energy, air?”, “Since it’s a fraud. , shouldn’t you be compensated?”
