India’s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to treat South Africa like the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, the newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do, on this basis, instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
How does Vinod Roy believe cricket can serve as a unifying force in the context of strained India-Pakistan relations?
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Roy. There’s been a lot of discussion recently about your comments regarding the isolation of Pakistan in cricket relations. Can you clarify your stance on this issue?
**Vinod Roy:** Thank you for having me. To clarify, I did not advocate for the isolation of Pakistan in cricket. My statements were made in response to public sentiment and media pressure after incidents like Pulwama. It was a complicated situation where I felt compelled to address the concerns being raised by fans and media alike.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned that you made those statements considering public opinion. Yet, after the Pulwama incident, you called for Pakistan to be treated similarly to South Africa during the apartheid period. How do you reconcile that with the values of the Olympic Charter, which advocates for sports as a human right?
**Vinod Roy:** That’s a fair question. My comments were driven by an emotional response to a national crisis. However, I also recognize that sports should transcend politics. It’s essential to find a balance. When faced with a potential loss of points in a crucial game, I felt that issuing a statement on isolation was a tactical move, not a strongly held belief.
**Interviewer:** With your position on allowing Pakistani players to compete in tournaments like the IPL being quite restrictive, do you not think this could further escalate tensions between the two nations?
**Vinod Roy:** It’s certainly a delicate balance. I understand the concerns regarding escalating tensions. I believe that we can still compete with Pakistan in a neutral venue. The focus should be on the sport, rather than allowing politics to dictate our game.
**Interviewer:** There are some who argue that prioritizing revenue over principle reflects a troubling compromise. How do you respond to that criticism?
**Vinod Roy:** I understand that viewpoint, but the reality is that cricket matches generate significant revenue for both nations. This economic aspect cannot be ignored. However, my intention was never to trivialize principles in favor of revenue; rather, it was about pragmatism in a challenging environment.
**Interviewer:** As a final thought, how do you envision the future of India-Pakistan cricket relations evolving in light of these tensions?
**Vinod Roy:** I hope we can see a future where cricket acts as a bridge rather than a barrier. My ideal scenario would involve both teams playing against each other without the surrounding political turmoil, but that requires a collective shift in perspective from both sides.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for sharing your insights, Mr. Roy. This is clearly a complex issue that resonates with many cricket fans and political observers alike.
—
**Debate Question for Readers:** Considering Vinod Roy’s rationale for his statements and strategies, do you think sports should remain separate from national politics, or are moments of national crisis a legitimate basis for imposing restrictions like those discussed? What are your thoughts on the implications for cricket’s role as a unifying force in South Asia?
