India’s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to treat South Africa like the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, the newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do, on this basis, instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
What are the potential impacts of political tensions on the future of India-Pakistan cricket relations, as discussed by Vinod Roy in the interview?
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of the BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Mr. Roy. Your recent statements regarding the isolation of Pakistan in cricket have sparked quite a debate. You mentioned that your announcement was largely influenced by public opinion. Can you elaborate on that?
**Vinod Roy:** Absolutely, thank you for having me. My intention was never to isolate Pakistan in cricket. However, following incidents like the Pulwama attack, there was immense pressure and sentiment among the public and media pushing for a strong stance. I felt it was necessary to respond to that atmosphere.
**Interviewer:** You drew parallels to the apartheid era in your comments about Pakistan, which some have deemed controversial. Do you believe this stance contradicts the spirit of the Olympic Charter that promotes sports as a means for peace?
**Vinod Roy:** That’s an important point. My remarks were made in a context driven by national sentiment, not a personal belief. I recognize that using the term “apartheid” was extreme, and I wouldn’t advocate for a permanent isolation of any nation. The intention was to convey the gravity of the situation.
**Interviewer:** In light of your admission that Pakistani players are not allowed to participate in the IPL, do you worry about setting a precedent that could affect future relations in cricket?
**Vinod Roy:** It’s a tricky situation. The suggestion in the media was that if we refused to play, we would lose points that could affect our standings, especially if it was a crucial match. My goal was to seek a middle ground—playing matches at neutral venues could be a way to maintain the integrity and excitement of the game without endorsing any political stances.
**Interviewer:** It seems your approach has been pragmatic but also received mixed reactions. How do you respond to critics who say that economic interests, particularly revenue from matches against Pakistan, might be influencing BCCI’s decisions?
**Vinod Roy:** There’s no denying that economics plays a role in sports. However, we always aim to balance financial considerations with the principles of sportsmanship. My personal concern lies in ensuring that Indian cricket performs well, not just in terms of revenue but also integrity.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, Mr. Roy, given the division in public opinion over these issues, what do you think the long-term implications might be for India-Pakistan relations in cricket?
**Vinod Roy:** The long-term implications could go either way. On one hand, sustained isolation could deepen divides; on the other, open dialogue and competition—even at neutral sites—could foster understanding and reduce tensions. It’s crucial for cricket to remain a platform for unity rather than division, and that requires careful navigation of both public sentiment and the realities of international relations.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr. Roy, for sharing your thoughts on such a complex issue.
**Question for the Audience:** Given the tensions surrounding India-Pakistan cricket relations and the implications of political influences on sports, do you believe that sports should remain separate from political considerations, or are there instances where such a mix is justified? What are your thoughts?
