India’s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to treat South Africa like the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, the newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do, on this basis, instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
How do you believe public sentiment should influence decisions made by cricket administrators regarding international relations in the sport?
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of the BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Roy. Recently, you made headlines with your statement regarding the isolation of Pakistan in cricket, which you now say was driven by public sentiment. Can you clarify your stance on this issue?
**Vinod Roy:** Absolutely, and thank you for having me. My statement on isolating Pakistan was not a reflection of my personal beliefs but rather a response to the prevailing public opinion at that time. In the wake of the Pulwama incident, there was enormous pressure from the media and fans to take a strong stance against Pakistan. I felt compelled to act within that context.
**Interviewer:** You made a controversial comparison, suggesting that Pakistan should be treated like South Africa during the apartheid era. Do you think that such a statement aligns with the principles of sportsmanship and the Olympic Charter, which views sports as a human right?
**Vinod Roy:** It is a delicate balance. I understand the concerns, but my intention was to highlight the frustration that many felt after the incident. However, I recognize that sport should transcend politics. The overarching goal should be to compete fairly, and while I made that statement under pressure, I personally do not advocate for isolating any nation in sports.
**Interviewer:** It’s been reported that Pakistani players are not allowed to participate in the IPL, and there appears to be a reluctance to play against them even in international tournaments. How do you reconcile that with your view of promoting fair competition?
**Vinod Roy:** The IPL has its own set of dynamics, and I acknowledge the challenges it presents. When considering the World Cup match against Pakistan, the sentiment was strongly against playing them due to the political climate. However, refusing to play could have unintended consequences for our standings in the tournament. Ultimately, I opted for a stance where we could still compete at neutral venues, which I believe is a reasonable compromise.
**Interviewer:** Given the current climate, where do you see the future of India-Pakistan cricket relations? Is a return to normalcy possible?
**Vinod Roy:** It will take time and requires both nations to prioritize dialogue over conflict, not just in cricket but in all interactions. I hope that as time goes on, the focus can shift back to the sport itself, allowing players from both sides to compete without the influence of political tensions.
**Interviewer:** To wrap up, what would you say to those who argue that your comments may further inflame tensions and detract from the spirit of the game?
**Vinod Roy:** I entirely understand that viewpoint. It’s a reminder that our words carry weight, especially in such a polarized environment. My hope is that we can use sport as a bridge rather than a barrier. It’s crucial for us to remember that while we may have differences politically, we all share a love for cricket that can unite us.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights, Mr. Roy. As we continue this discussion, how do our readers feel about the role of politics in sports? Should cricket be a platform for political statements, or should it strictly remain a realm for fair competition?
[Let’s hear your thoughts in the comments below!]
