India‘s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When he was asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to behave like South Africa during the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do. Instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
In your view, what steps can be taken to ensure that sports maintain their integrity and transcend the political issues surrounding international competitions?
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of the BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Good morning, Mr. Roy. Thank you for joining us to discuss your recent statements regarding Pakistan’s participation in world cricket. You’ve mentioned that your call for isolating Pakistan was a reaction to public opinion rather than a personal belief. Can you elaborate on the pressures you felt leading up to that announcement?
**Vinod Roy:** Good morning. Yes, the situation was quite complex. The Pulwama incident sparked significant sentiment among the public and media that led many to believe that India should take a stand against Pakistan in sports. My statement was not about my personal views; it was about navigating that public sentiment and making the best decision for the BCCI.
**Interviewer:** You drew a parallel with South Africa during the apartheid era. Were you concerned that this might raise ethical questions, particularly in light of the Olympic Charter which promotes sports as a human right?
**Vinod Roy:** Absolutely, that’s a critical point. My intention was not to undermine the principles of sportsmanship or the Olympic ethos. It was a rhetorical comparison, but I recognize it might have been interpreted differently. The context was that if we were to completely refuse to play them, we could be penalizing ourselves in terms of points and potential advancement in tournaments.
**Interviewer:** You also noted that there were discussions in media suggesting the BCCI’s motives were purely financial. How do you respond to those criticisms?
**Vinod Roy:** That claim was troubling to hear. Cricket is a sport that brings immense pride to both nations, and our approach has always been to balance sports integrity with the realities of the situation. Refusing to play could hurt us competitively while also disregarding the historical significance of India-Pakistan matches. It’s about finding a middle ground.
**Interviewer:** In hindsight, do you believe your statement had the intended effect? Or do you think it may have exacerbated tensions further?
**Vinod Roy:** It’s difficult to gauge fully. While I aimed to express a position that resonated with public opinion, I also recognize that it can fuel existing tensions. The key takeaway for me is the importance of dialog and finding ways to engage with all nations in a sportsmanlike manner.
**Interviewer:** some fans argue that sports should transcend politics. Do you think it’s possible for countries to compete on neutral grounds without the shadow of political issues?
**Vinod Roy:** Ideally, yes. Sports should be a unifying force. However, in reality, external factors often influence perceptions and participation. The goal should be to gradually work towards a model where competitive spirit is prioritized over political differences.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr. Roy, for sharing your insights.
—
**Debate Question:** Given the complex relationship between sports and politics, do you believe the BCCI’s approach to isolating Pakistan in cricket was justified or should sports always remain separate from political tensions? Share your thoughts!