India’s statement of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket turned out to be political, BCCI Committee of Administrators Chairman Vinod Roy said that the announcement was made keeping in view the public opinion.
Vinod Roy, the head of the Committee of Administrators appointed by the Supreme Court in the Indian Cricket Board, clarified in an interview that he was not a supporter of isolating Pakistan in the world of cricket, but made such a statement considering the public opinion. When asked that after the Pulwama incident, he demanded Pakistan to treat South Africa like the apartheid era, but was this demand not against the Olympic Charter, which includes sports as a human right?
Vinod Roy said that Pakistani players are not allowed to play in IPL, while we had a match against them in the World Cup on June 16, the general idea was that the competition should be refused, newspapers were also giving the same news, a TV. It was even said on the channel that BCCI only wants to play with Pakistan for the sake of revenue. What should have been my reaction in such a situation? I said that if we refuse to play, we will lose 2 points and if the competition is in the semi-final, then what will we do. Instead of shooting myself in the foot, I made a statement to isolate Pakistan. gave
According to the report, when he was asked if he really wanted to isolate Pakistan in world cricket, he bluntly said that he did not want to do so. Can’t go and play but can compete with any country at a neutral venue.
#sports #field #escape #Indian #attacks #conspiracy #isolate #Pakistan #exposed
How does Vinod Roy envision the future of India-Pakistan cricket matches in the context of political tensions and public sentiment towards these encounters?
**Interview with Vinod Roy, Chairman of BCCI Committee of Administrators**
**Interviewer:** Mr. Roy, thank you for joining us today. Recently, you made headlines with your statement regarding the isolation of Pakistan in cricket. Can you clarify your position on this matter?
**Vinod Roy:** Thank you for having me. To be clear, I do not support the isolation of Pakistan in the world of cricket. My statement was a response to the prevailing public opinion. After the Pulwama attack, there was significant pressure from the media and fans to take a firm stand against Pakistan, and I found myself in a difficult position where I had to consider the implications of either playing or withdrawing from matches.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned that there were calls to treat Pakistan similarly to South Africa during the apartheid era. How do you reconcile that stance with the Olympic Charter, which advocates for sports as a human right?
**Vinod Roy:** That’s an important point. In retrospect, my comments were based on public sentiment rather than my personal beliefs. While there was a strong desire to penalize Pakistan, I recognize that such actions can conflict with the principles of sportsmanship and the spirit of the game. I certainly don’t wish to support measures that go against the Olympic ideals.
**Interviewer:** During the World Cup match on June 16, it was widely speculated that India’s participation was motivated by financial gain. Can you respond to these assertions?
**Vinod Roy:** The financial aspect is often highlighted, but it’s not the only reason. If we had refused to play, we faced losing crucial points, particularly when it comes to tournament standings. My aim was to ensure that we don’t jeopardize our position in the World Cup. It wasn’t just about the money; I was trying to think strategically for Indian cricket.
**Interviewer:** You indicated a preference for neutral venues for matches against Pakistan. Does that suggest a long-term strategy for how India interacts with Pakistan in cricket?
**Vinod Roy:** Yes, I believe that playing at neutral venues is a pragmatic approach. It allows us to compete without directly sanctioning or isolating either country. My views reflect a desire to find a balance between sport and the broader political context.
**Interviewer:** how do you think the cricketing community will react to your statements and the ongoing discourse around India-Pakistan matches?
**Vinod Roy:** I think there will be a mix of opinions. Some will support the need for a united and politically neutral approach, while others may feel strongly about isolation due to historical and political grievances. Ultimately, it’s essential for the cricketing community to engage in this debate constructively.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr. Roy. Your insights into this complex issue highlight the intricate relationship between sports and politics.
—
**Debate Question for Readers:**
Given the complexities of sports diplomacy and the contentious history between India and Pakistan, do you believe isolation is a viable solution in cricket, or should the focus be on promoting matches even under strained political relations? How should sports organizations navigate such challenges while upholding their values?
