The newspaper quoted American reports that Egypt’s approval of this presence is based on guarantees from the United States that it would be temporary. Cairo also asked the Americans to guarantee that Israel would not carry out operations again in the axis or the Rafah crossing, even if the second phase of negotiations reached a dead end.
Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported that Egypt has agreed to build a new barrier along the axis, including sensors and security cameras, with funding from the United States, and another point of contention is Israel’s access to data from the planned border.
Last August, a senior Egyptian official familiar with the negotiations in Cairo explained in a conversation with the Hebrew website Ynet that “agreeing to an Israeli military presence along the Philadelphi Corridor is unacceptable. This has been our position since the beginning of the negotiations, and we have no intention of changing it.”
But the official added, “I will not comment on the introduction of Israeli surveillance and monitoring equipment along the route.” In other words, the Egyptian official declined to clarify whether Cairo intended to quietly agree to the installation of Israeli electronic surveillance equipment along the route, and stressed that the United States was making optimistic statements despite the significant challenges remaining before securing the deal.
“The Americans intend to maintain a businesslike, and perhaps positive, atmosphere between senior Egyptian and Israeli officials,” the official added. “But Netanyahu’s influence is felt in the negotiating room, and we know he receives immediate updates from the talks.”
Egyptian Chief of Staff Ahmed Fathi Khalifa arrived at the Rafah border crossing with Gaza last week, on a surprise visit to his forces there. Egyptian television said the general’s visit was “to secure the country’s borders in all strategic directions.”
Source: Yedioth Ahronoth
#Hebrew #media #talks #conditions #set #Egypt #exchange #approval #Israeli #presence #Philadelphi #Corridor
2024-09-09 23:04:55
Rafah crossing Philadelphi Corridor
Table of Contents
The Philadelphi Corridor: A Flashpoint in Israeli-Egyptian Relations
The Philadelphi Corridor, a strategic border region between Gaza and Egypt, has been a contentious issue in Israeli-Egyptian relations for decades. Recent developments have seen Israel extend its control over the entire land border with Gaza, including the Philadelphi Corridor, sparking tensions with Egypt and the Palestinians [[2]][[3]].
Historical Context
The Philadelphi Corridor, also known as the Rafah Crossing, is a 14-kilometer-long border region that connects Gaza to Egypt. The corridor has been a significant crossing point for goods and people between the two territories. However, its strategic importance has made it a flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israeli-Egyptian relations.
Border Disputes
Israel’s formal borders with Egypt, demarcated in 1906, have been a subject of dispute [[1]]. The Philadelphi Corridor has been a particular point of contention, with Israel seeking to maintain control over the region to prevent smuggling and terrorist activities. Egypt, on the other hand, has been resistant to Israeli military presence in the corridor, citing sovereignty concerns.
Recent Developments
Recent reports suggest that Egypt has agreed to build a new barrier along the Philadelphi Corridor, complete with sensors and security cameras, funded by the United States [[paragraph 2]]. However, a senior Egyptian official has reiterated that Egypt will not accept Israeli military presence in the corridor, despite American guarantees of a temporary presence [[paragraph 3]].
The issue of Israeli surveillance and monitoring equipment along the corridor remains a point of contention, with the Egyptian official declining to comment on the matter [[paragraph 4]]. This has raised concerns about the possibility of Israel accessing data from the planned border, further straining relations between the two countries.
Implications
The Philadelphi Corridor dispute highlights the complex and sensitive nature of Israeli-Egyptian relations. The corridor’s strategic importance makes it a critical issue in the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with implications for regional security and stability.
As Israel continues to assert its control over the corridor, it remains to be seen how Egypt will respond, and what role the United States will play in mediating the dispute. One thing is clear, however: the Philadelphi Corridor will remain a contentious issue in Israeli-Egyptian relations for the foreseeable future.
References
[[1]]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BordersofIsrael
[[2]]https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1994g22ve9o
[[3]]https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgl2370ldxro
SEO Keywords: Philadelphi Corridor, Israeli-Egyptian relations, Gaza border, Israel-Egypt border, border disputes, regional security, Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Rafah crossing Philadelphi Corridor
The Philadelphi Corridor: A Flashpoint in Israeli-Egyptian Relations
The Philadelphi Corridor, a strategic border region between Gaza and Egypt, has been a contentious issue in Israeli-Egyptian relations for decades. Recent developments have seen Israel extend its control over the entire land border with Gaza, including the Philadelphi Corridor, sparking tensions with Egypt and the Palestinians [[2]][[3]].
Historical Context
The Philadelphi Corridor, also known as the Rafah Crossing, is a 14-kilometer-long border region that connects Gaza to Egypt. The corridor has been a significant crossing point for goods and people between the two territories. However, its strategic importance has made it a flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Israeli-Egyptian relations.
Border Disputes
Israel’s formal borders with Egypt, demarcated in 1906, have been a subject of dispute [[1]]. The Philadelphi Corridor has been a particular point of contention, with Israel seeking to maintain control over the region to prevent smuggling and terrorist activities. Egypt, on the other hand, has been resistant to Israeli military presence in the corridor, citing sovereignty concerns.
Recent Developments
Recent reports suggest that Egypt has agreed to build a new barrier along the Philadelphi Corridor, complete with sensors and security cameras, funded by the United States [[paragraph 2]]. However, a senior Egyptian official has reiterated that Egypt will not accept Israeli military presence in the corridor, despite American guarantees of a temporary presence [[paragraph 3]].
The issue of Israeli surveillance and monitoring equipment along the corridor remains a point of contention, with the Egyptian official declining to comment on the matter [[paragraph 4]]. This has raised concerns about the possibility of Israel accessing data from the planned border, further straining relations between the two countries.
Implications
The Philadelphi Corridor dispute highlights the complex and sensitive nature of Israeli-Egyptian relations. The corridor’s strategic importance makes it a critical issue in the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with implications for regional security and stability.
As Israel continues to assert its control over the corridor, it remains to be seen how Egypt will respond, and what role the United States will play in mediating the situation. The Philadelphi Corridor dispute serves as a reminder of the intricate and delicate nature of regional relations, where even small developments can have far-reaching consequences.
References:
[[1]](https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-egypt-philadelphi-corridor-cd15c27cecffe70322becd933cf38909)
[[2]](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/gazas-philadelphi-corridor-its-importance-ceasefire-talks-2024-09-06/)
[[3]](https://www.lorientlejour.com/article/1363771/en-bordure
