‘Dr. New’ pointed out the case of 8-year-old ‘Uncle Tu’ who wrote the constitution, did not know the subject matter. There is no parliamentary system anywhere in the world that limits the term of office of a prime minister. But it is often used for the presidency. When mixed together, it becomes a breeding system. piebald It is a source of confusion in interpretation.
16 September 2022 – Dr. Supanut Apinyana or Dr. New, a researcher under the MAST Center Research Institute and the Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, USA, posted on Facebook as follows:
In the case of eight years, Uncle Tu pointed out that the constitution writer did not know the principles.
1. There is no parliamentary system anywhere in the world. that he limited the length of office of Prime Minister
2. Limiting the length of tenure of a leader It is often applied to the presidency in the presidential system.
3. Limiting the length of tenure of a leader The English word Term limit literally translates to a limit on the number of terms. which will count the duration as the number of semesters not counting the number of years
The problem in the case of Eight Years Lung Tu is therefore an example of various disciplines in the Constitution. which comes from people who write the constitution who do not know the correct principles It also combines principles in the parliamentary system and the presidential system. until becoming a breeding system piebald
Therefore, writing an unscientific state Dharma from the beginning is a source of confusion in the interpretation of the Constitution. as well as leading to debates on basic problems that should not become a national problem in any way
As for the claim that the eight-year limit is to prevent a monopoly on power. It’s just a solution to the problem at the root cause only. Because capitalists, political businessmen, who are real dictators, can find a puppet to replace them anyway.
The solution to the national crisis is to create democracy. Only make sovereignty truly belong to the people. to lead to the acquisition of representatives who represent the people It is no longer representative of the capitalists, businessmen, politicians behind political parties.