DPS-Dogan requests a temporary commission for KTB, Bulgartabac and the Eight Dwarfs ᐉ News from Fakti.bg – Bulgaria

DPS-Dogan requests a temporary commission for KTB, Bulgartabac and the Eight Dwarfs ᐉ News from Fakti.bg – Bulgaria

A New Chapter for bulgaria: Tackling Corruption​ and⁢ the “Peevski Model”

Bulgaria finds itself​ at a crossroads, ⁣grappling with a political crisis ⁣and the enduring challenge of corruption. ⁢The Movement for Rights and ⁢Freedoms (DPS) has taken the helm, promising⁣ a decisive shift in the nation’s trajectory. This bold ‌move, according to Sevim Ali, deputy from the DPS and chairman of the parliamentary committee on agriculture,⁤ food and forests, wasn’t born out of fear.

“We were not driven by ‍fear. We took the decision to participate in​ management after‌ a meeting of our collective bodies. We took a statesmanship decision so that Bulgaria ‍could get​ out of the political crisis,” Ali stated in an interview on⁣ BTV’s “Lice v Lice” program. ‌The DPS’ platform aims to address the root of the problem: corruption. “We will stop corruption schemes, this is included in the management program. ⁣We will‍ work‌ not only ⁢to stop corruption schemes, but also to stop‌ the ‘Peevski’ model, which is harmful ⁤to ⁣Bulgaria.”

Ali’s words reflect a⁤ deep concern about the influence of Delyan Peevski, a‍ prominent figure‍ frequently ⁤enough associated ​with opaque business dealings and alleged ​manipulation of state institutions. The “Peevski model,” ‍as it has come⁤ to be known, has cast ⁣a long shadow over‌ Bulgarian politics, raising questions‍ about undue influence ⁢and the erosion of democratic norms.

Ali paints a stark picture of⁤ the “Peevski model” in action:⁣ “Because of this model, during the election campaign, we had classic examples of ⁣political showdown with political​ opponents, repression with the help of KPCONPI ​on peopel who‍ do not share the same view with the ⁣’WHO’ ​model.” He ⁣goes on to illustrate the chilling effects of this model: “The​ ‘Peevski’ model uses state institutions as a club. The ‍’Glavchev’ cabinet was used⁢ as a rubber stamp for the execution ​of Peevski’s whims. During ‍this‍ cabinet, it was said that Delyan Peevski had no regional governors, and today he called on them to resign.”

The ‍DPS’s commitment to‌ dismantling the “Peevski model” signals a‍ resolute effort to​ restore accountability ‌and openness ⁣in Bulgarian governance. Whether ‌this ⁣ambitious undertaking ⁢will succeed ⁣remains to be seen, but it⁤ marks a notable step towards a more equitable and democratic future for Bulgaria.

bulgaria’s Political ‌Turmoil Fuels​ Fears of Corruption’s Resurgence

Bulgaria’s political⁤ landscape remains​ fraught with instability, a reality that has become increasingly worrisome in recent years. The nation ⁢has endured ​five ⁢elections ‍in just two years, leaving a trail of fractured⁤ governance and a fertile breeding ground ‍for‌ corruption. This political volatility hinders the establishment of consistent policies,​ further exacerbating ⁢the issue.

Sevim Ali, ⁤a prominent figure in Bulgarian politics, has expressed grave concerns about the pervasiveness of corruption, stating, ​”We will ‌propose to create a temporary committee in the parliament for the scandals with ‘Bulgartabac’, with KTB, with ‘Eight dwarfs’, with BBR. ‌There are many examples of⁤ corrupt practices of this‌ model in the ⁢past. For all this, we will ask for a ⁤commission‌ of inquiry to make everything clear‍ to the Bulgarian society.” Her call⁢ for a parliamentary⁤ examination underlines the urgency of addressing the deeply rooted problem.

Ali’s stance also reflects ​a commitment to shared responsibility,declaring,”For ‍us,the participation of the authorities is not an end in itself,but our⁢ participation is ⁤a guarantee of sharing political ​responsibility. We do not run away from responsibility, for us participation ⁣in power is bearing responsibility.” this emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability from those in power.

Seeking to contribute ‌to⁢ the solution, Ali’s group is prepared to actively ⁣participate in the government, emphasizing their readiness to serve in key positions.‌ “We have prepared ‍personnel – we can be useful with‌ deputy ministers, ​with ​regional governors, with ⁤deputy regional governors,” she stated.

Bulgaria’s ongoing struggle with corruption poses a significant challenge to its democratic development ⁤and economic prosperity.⁤ addressing this complex issue requires a multi-faceted approach, ‍involving robust legal frameworks, effective law enforcement, a commitment to transparency, and active public engagement.

What‍ specific actions will⁤ the DPS⁢ take to⁣ reform⁢ Bulgaria’s institutions and ensure openness in governance to​ combat the ⁢”Peevski model”?

Bulgaria at a ‌Crossroads: An Interview⁤ with Sevim Ali on Tackling Corruption

Following Bulgaria’s recent political instability and the controversial accession of the⁣ Movement for ‍Rights and Freedoms ⁣(DPS) to power,‍ Archyde spoke exclusively with Sevim Ali, Deputy from ⁣the DPS⁢ and ‍Chairman of the parliamentary committee ‌on agriculture, food ‌and forests. Ali offered insights⁢ into‍ the ​DPS’s commitment to tackling corruption,​ a pervasive issue that has plagued the nation for years.

Archyde: Welcome, Ms. Ali. Bulgaria ‍finds itself in​ a ‌delicate ‌political situation. What⁤ motivated the DPS’s decision to participate in the government at this ⁤juncture?

Sevim Ali: ‍We were ⁢not driven by fear. We took the decision to participate in management after ​a meeting of our collective bodies. We took a statesmanship⁤ decision so that Bulgaria could get out of ⁤the political crisis.

Archyde:‍ Your platform emphasizes a decisive shift in⁣ tackling corruption. Can you elaborate on this commitment, specifically regarding what the “Peevski⁢ model” represents⁣ and how ​the ⁣DPS plans to dismantle it?

Sevim ‌Ali: We⁣ will stop corruption schemes, this is included in the management program. We will⁢ work not only to stop corruption⁤ schemes, but ⁤also to stop the “Peevski‍ model,” which is harmful to Bulgaria.Because of⁢ this model, during‌ the ⁣election campaign, we had classic⁢ examples of political showdown with political opponents, ⁣repression with the help of​ KPCONPI‍ on people who do​ not share the same view with the “WHO” model. The “Peevski” model uses state institutions as‍ a club. ​The “Glavchev” cabinet​ was⁣ used as a rubber stamp for the execution of Peevski’s whims. During ⁢this cabinet,it was said that delyan Peevski had no ⁢regional governors,and ⁤today he called on them ‌to resign.

Archyde: Ms. Ali, ‍your words paint a⁤ concerning picture ⁣of how this “model” has‍ operated. What concrete steps will the DPS take to ​ensure accountability and prevent this kind of influence from regaining a foothold?

Sevim Ali: For​ us, the participation ‌of the authorities is not⁤ an end in itself, but our participation is a guarantee of sharing political responsibility. We do not run ⁢away from responsibility, for us participation in⁤ power is ⁤bearing responsibility. We have ​prepared personnel -‌ we‍ can be useful with deputy ministers, ⁢with regional governors,‌ with deputy regional governors.

Archyde: This commitment to transparency and responsibility is crucial for Bulgaria’s future. Do you have a message for the Bulgarian‌ people as they navigate these uncertain times?

Sevim Ali: ⁤We believe in Bulgaria’s future. We believe‌ in the strength of⁤ our people and their desire for a better society. Together, we can overcome the challenges ahead and build a brighter future for all.

What⁢ are your thoughts on the challenges facing Bulgaria? Share your viewpoint in​ the comments below.

Leave a Replay