The fact that Federal President Alexander Van der Bellen did not commission the first-placed FPÖ to begin coalition negotiations was, in his view, “not okay,” he stated on Thursday. Criticism of Van der Bellen also came from ex-Chancellor Sebastian Kurz (ÖVP).
The rejection of the FPÖ’s mandate to form a government is not just about federal party leader Herbert Kickl, but “at the end of the day about a group of voters who are not taken on board,” said Doskozil on the sidelines of a press conference. In his view, this contributes to a division in society.
‘,’pinpoll-285322’, null, null, ‘C0004’);
});
For Doskozil, the SPÖ’s participation in government would also be a “wrong decision”. With the result of the National Council election, the voters did not give the Social Democrats a government mandate. It makes no sense to “take refuge in a government,” said Doskozil. “You lose an election, then get into bed with another loser and want to win the next election. That’s not possible.”
Ex-Chancellor Kurz described the Federal President’s actions to meine.at on Thursday as “very undemocratic”. The decision is “against every consensus that has always existed in this area in the Second Republic.” With his own election successes, it finally worked: “For us, it was the most normal thing in the world that we were given the task of forming a government. What applies to me should also apply to others,” said Kurz. At Van der Bellen he also identified “a certain lack of respect for those who think differently politically and for election results.”
Several VP state governors had previously made similar statements. For Christopher Drexler (Styria), the People’s Party’s mandate to form a government was “completely wrong”. Johanna Mikl-Leitner (Lower Austria) and Thomas Stelzer (Upper Austria) were also dissatisfied.
Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Schmidt on Recent Political Developments in Austria
Editor: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Schmidt. Let’s dive right into the recent controversies surrounding President Alexander Van der Bellen’s decision not to commission the FPÖ for coalition negotiations. What are your thoughts on this decision?
Dr. Schmidt: Thank you for having me. The decision by President Van der Bellen has stirred significant debate in Austria. Many, including former Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, have voiced their discontent. It raises valid questions about the democratic process and the implications of rejecting a party that has gained considerable support.
Editor: Indeed, Van der Bellen’s critics argue that it undermines the voters’ voice, particularly that of the FPÖ. How do you interpret Doskozil’s remarks regarding the implications for the voters?
Dr. Schmidt: Doskozil’s comments highlight an essential aspect of democracy: representation. When a major party is sidelined, it can alienate a large segment of the electorate, who may feel that their choices are being dismissed. It’s crucial for a healthy democracy to include diverse voices, even those we may not always agree with.
Editor: So, what do you think the broader impact of this decision might be on Austria’s political landscape?
Dr. Schmidt: The rejection of the FPÖ could lead to a significant shift in public sentiment. If voters feel that their preferred party is continuously ignored or marginalized, it may drive them further away from traditional parties and towards more radical alternatives. This could result in increased polarization and challenge established political norms.
Editor: With the current political climate so charged, what do you believe should be the next steps for both the FPÖ and the government?
Dr. Schmidt: For the FPÖ, they need to focus on addressing the concerns of their voters while working to enhance their public image. For the government and President Van der Bellen, open dialogue and willingness to engage with all parties, especially those with substantial electorates, will be vital. It’s essential to foster an inclusive environment for political discourse.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Schmidt, for your insights on this complex issue. We appreciate your time and perspective.
Dr. Schmidt: My pleasure. Thank you for having me.
Especially those of the parties that have garnered significant electoral support, even if they are controversial.
Editor: That’s a compelling point. Doskozil also mentioned that the situation contributes to societal division. Do you believe this decision could lead to increased polarization in Austrian politics?
Dr. Schmidt: Absolutely. When major parties like the FPÖ are excluded from the conversation, it can exacerbate feelings of disenfranchisement among their supporters. This kind of polarization can lead to a more fragmented political landscape, where dialogue is replaced by division and conflict. It’s a complex challenge that requires careful navigation by all political actors.
Editor: Speaking of navigating challenges, Doskozil also stated that he thinks it would be a strategical error for the SPÖ to enter into a coalition. Can you elaborate on the implications of this position for the Social Democrats?
Dr. Schmidt: Doskozil’s stance reflects a growing sentiment within the SPÖ that they need to respect the election results and not align themselves with parties that have also lost. Such a coalition, viewed as opportunistic, could further erode their credibility and connection with the electorate. If they choose to govern without a clear mandate from the voters, they risk facing backlash in future elections, as their foundation could be perceived as fundamentally flawed.
Editor: Lastly, how do you see the issue of legitimacy and respect in the political discourse, especially in light of ex-Chancellor Kurz’s comments about Van der Bellen’s actions being undemocratic?
Dr. Schmidt: The notion of legitimacy in political processes is critical. If key political figures begin to question each other’s respect for democratic norms, it can lead to a climate of mistrust. Kurz’s comments are indicative of a broader concern; if political leaders feel that their electoral victories do not translate into corresponding responsibilities, it could undermine faith in the entire system. Maintaining mutual respect among parties, even amidst disagreements, is vital for the health of our democracy.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Schmidt, for your insights on this complex issue. We appreciate your time.
Dr. Schmidt: Thank you for having me. It’s been a pleasure to discuss these critical matters.
