Federal Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said in a press conference on Sunday that Supreme Court Two judges of The seats But has raised important points in his dissenting note regarding summary judgment and in this case he Jamaat Relief was granted to who was not the petitioner.
He said in a press conference held in Islamabad that Justice Aminuddin Khan and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan said in their dissenting note that the detailed decision of the case could not come despite the passage of 15 days.
According to official news agency APP, he said that usually a detailed decision is issued within 15 days of the decision. “Some articles of the constitution are related to specific seats, in the decision regarding specific seats, the decision was given apart from these articles.”
Two honorable judges of the Supreme Court have raised constitutional and legal points in their dissenting notes, these points are a big question mark on the legal framework, they must be answered.
According to the Federal Minister, the dissenting note also states that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf was not a party in this case, to give it relief, it has to go beyond the jurisdiction assigned in Articles 175 and 185 of the Constitution and Articles 51, 63 and 106. Must be suspended.
Tehreek-e-Insaaf was not present as a petitioner before the judiciary, but relief was granted to 81 of its members and those who had been elected to certain seats and had taken oath were terminated. The steps taken before they were terminated are legally in place.’
He said that it is a fact that if the members of the Sunni Ittehad Council rise from the Sunni Ittehad Council in the House and sit in the ranks of Tehreek-e-Insaaf, it will be a violation of Article 62(1)F.
He said that the dissenting note also stated that it is a proven fact that the Sunni Ittehad Council did not participate in the general elections as a political party even the chairman of the Sunni Ittehad Council contested as an independent.
He said that the constitution and the law are clear on this. According to the constitution, the political parties that are present in the parliament are given specific seats under the formula of proportional representation.
He said that the Sunni Ittehad Council did not exist in the parliament, its chairman also contested the election as an independent and former members of Tehreek-e-Insaaf considered it appropriate to join the party which did not exist in the parliament.
This section contains related reference points (Related Nodes field).
He asked that when a political party does not exist in the parliament, how can they get specific seats?
The Federal Minister said that in its constitution of the Sunni Unity Council, it is written that no minority member can join his party, thus they cannot get minority seats.
“From the controversial note, the question has arisen that the implementation of this decision will have to suspend the articles relating to specific seats in the constitution.”
The federal minister said that Tehreek-e-Insaaf was given relief in this case without asking, relief was given to those who did not come to ask for relief.
He said that the people who were elected on specific seats, their rights have also been lost, they should have been heard too.
Federal Minister of Information said that against the decision of specific seats, Pakistan Muslim League (N) and Pakistan People’s Party have filed a review application, but it has not been scheduled for hearing yet.
#Dissent #note #reserved #seats #Big #question #legal #framework #Atta #Tarr
2024-08-05 15:44:01
