Some passages from an article published by the British tabloid The Daily Mail were “defamatory” once morest Prince Harry, grandson of Queen Elizabeth, the High Court in London ruled on Friday.
• Read also: Harassment case targeting Meghan: improved procedures at Buckingham
• Read also: Future King William turns 40
• Read also: End of the jubilee celebrations of a largely absent Queen Elizabeth
Prince Harry had started proceedings in February once morest Associated Newspapers, one of the largest British press groups, following an article in the Mail on Sunday, the Sunday edition of the Daily Mail.
According to his defence, the article falsely accused the Duke of Sussex of ‘lying’, ‘cynically’ trying to manipulate public opinion and ‘trying to keep secret’ his appeal once morest the government to try to obtain police protection in the country.
Harry and his wife Meghan Markle live in the United States. They decided to step back from the royal family in 2019, which deprived them of the right to police protection at the expense of the British taxpayer.
Harry has offered to cover these costs while in the UK and is now challenging the Home Office’s refusal in court. This procedure is still ongoing.
According to Judge Justice Nicklin, the article in the Daily Mail may suggest that the prince “tried to deceive the public” and believes that we are well within the realm of “defamation”.
According to British law, it is now up to the tabloid to prove the veracity of the accusations made.
In written statements to the court in June, Harry said the case had caused him “deep hurt, embarrassment and continuing anguish”.
In open war with the tabloids, Prince Harry holds the tabloid press responsible for the death of his mother Diana in 1997 in a car accident in Paris, pursued by the paparazzi.
The princely couple recently filed a complaint once morest several publications for invasion of the privacy of their family.
Last December, Meghan Markle won her case once morest the publisher of the Mail on Sunday, convicted for the publication of a letter she had written to her father. She then celebrated a “victory” once morest a “cruel” and false sensational press according to her.
