The curtain is already closed for “abandoned house caseimmediatelySupreme Court Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions read the wordjudgeOn September 20, 2022 “dismiss” The case at the Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) as the plaintiff filed a lawsuit by himself, both “Suthep Thaugsuban“The former Deputy Prime Minister, along with “Big Sq.” 4 cases, 1 private person and 1 private representative
“Suthep” Porcelain politicians Through the heat through the cold for not less than 43 years of politics since winning the election The Surat Thani MPs, for the first time in 1979, faced a major monsoon in their lives with the incident of “Por. Kor Kor 4-01” in 1995, gave an interview following the court dismissed the lawsuit. glad to be clear of the unclean After being attacked as a corrupt person for 8-9 years and announced his support for the People’s Political Party but did not want to return to play politics once more Confirm not to sue anyone
In this regard, “Suthep” has always confirmed his purity since “Tarit Pengdit“The Director-General of the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) at that time had made the case since 2013 and sent it to the NACC for investigation. A sub-committee was set up to investigate in 2015 onwards, before passing a resolution to determine the culprit. in 2019
“Confirm that the duty is performed correctly comply with the Cabinet resolutions legal The unfinished part is regarding the administration of the Royal Thai Police’s contract with the contractor group.Suthep confirmed.
When “Suthep” fell out of this case Social trends will criticize the “NACC”, which is the main “work mother” for making expressions. and the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in this case
preliminary “Niwatchai KasemmongkolThe secretary-general of the NACC said that this issue would have to wait for the Criminal Bureau, the NACC to produce a full copy of the verdict for analysis before sending it to the NACC meeting for consideration. Is there an “appeal” or not, because according to the new law of the Supreme Court Allows the plaintiff and the defendant to appeal at the general meeting of the Supreme Court.
In the case of the NACC, there was no suing for bribery. Make the evidence weaker or not? and fully defended the case Criticism can be done. or if anyone has a clue New facts can be sent to NACC may consider further as well.
In the case of claiming bribes admitted that the evidence did not reach Because the information received is insightful. There is no evidence of the financial path. therefore only sue as long as there is complete evidence
The knot “call for bribes” is a decisive “death” that may change the direction of this case. Then why did the NACC not investigate further in depth on this matter?
foot before saying The case is divided into 2 idioms and has recently been combined into a single idiom in the Supreme Court’s hearings, namely:Construction of a police station (house) to replace 396 houses The damage was 1,728 million baht, andProject for the construction of accommodation buildings (flats) Police 163 houses, a damage of 3,994 million baht, with each idiom have the same name of the accused and only some differences
In this case, “DSI” Yuk “Tarit Pengdit” was responsible in 2013. There are many names of people in the expressions, including the name of “Abhisit Vejjajiva“The Prime Minister at that time also, but in the NACC hearings since 2015, these names have been eliminated. Due to insufficient evidence to be heard to be relevant
“Mahakhun subject“Krabi, the number one of the NACC, at that time was the chairman of the sub-committee of inquiry. Has been interviewed to confirm that The case for the construction of this replacement shelter It is not only the issue of wrongdoing under Section 157 of the Penal Code, but also deep into the financial path, or there may be “bribery” to government officials.
During the hearing of the committee The original NACC Tensions arose between “Wicha Mahakun” and “Suthep Thaugsuban” when “Suthep” sent a letter to the NACC requesting that “Wicha” be removed from being the chairman of the subcommittee of inquiry.
Because he used to be a “conflict” when “Suthep”, when he was the deputy prime minister, had a resolution of the SEC.big pod” Police Lieutenant General Patcharawat Wongsuwan Former police chief re-enters the government Contrary to the resolution of the NACC, which pointed to serious criminal and disciplinary offenses once morest “Big Pod” in the case of dispersing the PAD rally in 2008.
However, the NACC at that time remained “magical”, refusing to comply with the demands of “Suthep” by allowing “Wicha” to sit as the chairman of the subcommittee of inquiry.
When it came to the “Delaying” era of the NACC Office, a new committee came in to perform duties, led by “Big Gui”. Pol Gen Watcharapol Prasarnrajkit Former police chief, former “front room” General Prawit Wongsuwan Come sit on the podium.”President of the NACC” It seems that the “magic” is starting to fade away.
It is said that since the beginning of the era, the Office of the NACC in the Deciduous Era has “dark hands” playing the game of “defeating cases” that appear with the name of the surname “Wongsuwan” out of the directory, whether it is the case of dissolving the PAD rally including the scandalous police case Even without the last name “Wongsuwan” as the accused but appears in the case of the investigation In the issue of procurement in the first phase of the Royal Thai Police (Sq.)
The case for the construction of a replacement shelter from the original focus on the inquiry Investigate the financial path, find information on “taking bribes” for a large piece of evidence. “Politicians-government officials” turn to “turn the issue” to play regarding the “process” of procurement that collects a single contract. Refusing to separate procurement by sector causing them to be accused of offenses under Section 157 of the Penal Code and the “Hua Auction” case
This made many “NACC officers” who made such cases. No less dizzying headaches until the last meeting of the Board of Directors The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) resolved to point out that 6 cases of “Suthep-Khuo” offenses were only guilty of offenses under Section 157 of the Penal Code and the private sector was guilty of supporting them under the Hua Act.
There is no issue of “receiving bribes” in any way?
Even in the police flat construction project It appears the facts according to the investigation that During the construction, Pol Lt. Col. Komkrib Nuttalai, who was appointed as the Employment Inspection Committee, Provincial Police Region 6, requested payment from the contractor in exchange for assistance in the employment inspection in the amount of 60,000 baht and Pol Lt. Col. Sayan Cinnamon, who was appointed as a construction supervisor at the Provincial Police Region 5, has demanded money from the contractor in exchange for helping to control the construction in the amount of 91,618,000 baht, which is an unreasonable exploitation. legally for oneself or others
Easy to think, the level of just “police sword” still earns more than 91.6 million baht. Is there a bigger level than this or not?
In 2019, the NACC just clarified that the NACC is in the process of expanding the financial path in this case. But when pointing out the fault Mr. Suthep and others in the same year This is not the case at all?
But the NACC in the “deflection” era separates the bribery rhetoric to point “police sword” to “single death” for “unusually wealthy” of 91.6 million baht at the beginning of 2022 instead.
So it’s not strange when the committee The NACC misidentified Suthep-Chao and sent the case to the Attorney General.NESDB) There must be a joint working group to consider incompleteness. In the end, the prosecutor did not prosecute. NACC has to carry evidence to “sue by itself”
Finally, the conclusion of this case It may not be any different from the 2008 PAD rally dissolution case where the Supreme Court’s judgment “dismissed” the case.
When the NACC deteriorates the magical People have a crisis of faith, “Abandoned Shelter” will become a monument of shame, just like “Hopewell Pier”
