Dean Raises Alarm About Potential Changes to Health Studies Admissions Criteria

2024-09-13 09:36:56

It is urgent to have “a referee” on the reform of entry into health studies, and “we don’t have it today”regretted Benoît Veber, co-president of the conference of deans of medicine, on Thursday, September 12. During a back-to-school press conference, the dean of the Rouen faculty recalled, for the second year in a row, the consequences deemed worrying of the creation, in 2020, of two new access routes, the specific health access pathway (PASS) and the multiple licenses with health access option (L.AS).

These renovated courses had ended the first common preparatory year for health studies (Paces). The aim was to diversify the profiles of students and to demonstrate the contribution, in addition to health studies, of parallel training in another degree capable of enriching the skills of future practitioners who will encounter very different human situations, faced with the challenges of chronic diseases, the aging of the population or the revolution of artificial intelligence.

“We want to simplify and make access to health studies more readable. Currently, it is not readable, except for a specialist”continued the dean, recalling that the Minister of Higher Education, Sylvie Retailleau, had ruled out the hypothesis of a new “reform on reform”.

Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers Health studies: FAGE advocates for a single license and the end of the PASS and L.AS system

Add to your selections

The conference of deans proposes that universities choose a single training path: either that of the “all L.AS” offer or that of the PASS with the possibility of integrating a L.AS only in the second year and not from the first year, in order to maintain this “second step” introduced by the reform which allows rejected students to retry the competition one or two years later, in L.AS 2 or L.AS 3.

“The promotions are heterogeneous”

Another aspiration of the deans: that those admitted to the second year of medicine, pharmacy, midwifery and dentistry have benefited from the same volume of teaching in biomedical subjects. Currently, “The promotions are heterogeneous”with students from the PASS having benefited from four hundred hours and those from the different L.AS who only had one hundred. The repeat rate of L.AS is between 30% and 40% while that of students from PASS is almost zero.

Finally, the conference wants “resolve the problem of interclassification of different L.AS” that the health faculties approach very differently and without students understanding how they were separated. For Benoît Veber, the only solution would be to establish a common test for all L.AS on a course in a biomedical discipline.

You have 24.94% of this article left to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.

1726348575
#Health #studies #entry #reform #criticized #deans

What are the ​main challenges faced by​ the new health ⁤studies admission process in⁢ France?

Urgent Need for Reform‍ in Health Studies Admissions: Calls for Streamlined Process

The recent changes to the admission process for health studies⁢ in ⁤France have raised concerns among⁢ educators and experts. The creation of two new⁢ access routes,⁣ the Specific Health Access Pathway (PASS) and⁤ the Multiple Licenses with Health Access ⁢Option‍ (L.AS), has led to a complex and confusing system. Benoît Veber, co-president of the conference of deans of medicine, has⁣ expressed regret that​ there is no “referee” to oversee the reform, emphasizing the need for a simplified and more readable process.

Aims of the Reform

The⁤ reform, ​introduced in 2020, aimed to diversify student profiles and provide additional training ‌in fields other than health studies. This⁤ was ⁤intended to⁢ enrich the skills of future‍ healthcare​ professionals, ‍enabling them to tackle the challenges of chronic diseases, an aging population, and the impact of artificial intelligence. However, the implementation ‍has been criticized for its complexity and lack of coherence.

Consequences of the Reform

The abolition of the first common preparatory year for health studies (Paces) has led to a ⁢fragmented system, making it difficult for students to navigate. The PASS and L.AS routes have ⁣resulted in a heterogeneous student body, with varying ‍levels of biomedical training. This has led to concerns about the equity and ⁢fairness‍ of the ‌system.

Proposals for Simplification

The conference of deans‍ has proposed a single training path, allowing universities to choose between the ⁣”all L.AS” offer or the ‌PASS with the option to integrate L.AS in‌ the second year. This would maintain the “second step” introduced​ by the reform,⁤ enabling ‍rejected students to retry the​ competition in⁤ L.AS 2 or L.AS 3.

Standardization of Biomedical Training

Another key⁣ aspiration of the deans is to⁤ ensure that students admitted to the second year of medicine, pharmacy, midwifery, and dentistry have received the same⁣ volume of⁤ teaching in biomedical subjects. Currently, students from the PASS have received 400 hours of ⁤training, while those ⁤from L.AS have only had⁤ 100 hours. The repeat rate for L.AS is between ‌30% and 40%.

Minister’s Stance

Minister of Higher Education, Sylvie Retailleau,‍ has ruled ⁣out the possibility of a new “reform on reform,” emphasizing the need for stability in the system. However, the concerns raised by the conference of‌ deans are ⁤valid and require attention to ensure that the admission process⁤ is fair, equitable, and ⁤effective.

The Way‌ Forward

The urgent need for a streamlined⁢ and simplified admission process is clear. The​ conference of deans’ proposals provide a potential solution, but they require⁤ careful consideration and consultation with all stakeholders. The introduction of a single training path and standardization of biomedical training could help to address⁢ the ​current issues and provide a more cohesive and effective system.

In conclusion

The ⁢reform of the health studies admission process in France has‌ been met with criticism ⁤and concerns. The lack of⁣ a “referee” ​to oversee the reform has led to a complex and confusing system. The conference of deans’ proposals offer a potential⁢ solution, but it is essential to engage in a broader consultation and​ discussion to ensure that the admission process is fair, equitable, and effective.

Keywords:health studies, admission process, reform, France,‌ PASS, L.AS, ‍biomedical training, conference of deans, Minister of Higher​ Education, ‌Sylvie Retailleau, streamlining, simplification, ⁣single training path, standardization.

Meta Description: The admission process​ for health studies in France is in need​ of reform. The conference of deans⁤ proposes a simplified and standardized system, but what are the challenges and ​concerns⁢ surrounding this issue?

Header Tags:

H1: Urgent Need ‌for Reform in Health‍ Studies Admissions: Calls for Streamlined Process

H2: Aims of the Reform

H2: Consequences of the Reform

H2: Proposals for Simplification

H2: Standardization of Biomedical Training

H2:‌ Minister’s Stance

H2: The Way Forward

H2: In conclusion

What are the main criticisms of the current health studies admission process in France?

Reforming Health Studies Admissions: Deans Call for Urgent Overhaul of Controversial Entry Process

France’s health studies admission process has been under fire since the introduction of two new access routes in 2020: the Specific Health Access Pathway (PASS) and the Multiple Licenses with Health Access Option (L.AS). The reform aimed to diversify student profiles and provide future healthcare practitioners with a broader skillset. However, critics argue that the current system is convoluted, opaque, and unfair.

The Lack of a “Referee” in Health Studies Reform

Benoît Veber, co-president of the Conference of Deans of Medicine, lamented the absence of a regulating body to oversee the admission process, stating, “We don’t have a referee today.” This criticism comes as the new competition has resulted in nearly 1,000 fewer interns compared to the previous year.

Diversifying Student Profiles, But at What Cost?

The PASS and L.AS routes were introduced to bring in students from diverse backgrounds, enabling them to combine health studies with parallel training in another degree. However, the Conference of Deans believes that this renovation has created more problems than it has solved. The complexity of the admission process has led to a lack of transparency, making it difficult for students to navigate.

The Need for Simplification and Standardization

Veber emphasized the need to simplify and make access to health studies more readable, citing that the current system is only comprehensible to specialists. The Conference of Deans proposes a single training path, where universities can choose either the “all L.AS” offer or the PASS with the possibility of integrating a L.AS only in the second year. This would maintain the “second step” introduced by the reform, allowing rejected students to retry the competition one or two years later.

Heterogeneous Promotions and Unfair Advantages

The deans also highlight the issue of heterogeneous promotions, where students from different L.AS routes have varying levels of biomedical training. Those from the PASS route have received 400 hours of biomedical training, while those from L.AS routes have only received 100 hours. This disparity contributes to a significant repeat rate of 30-40% among L.AS students, compared to almost zero among PASS students.

Resolving Interclassification Issues and Establishing a Common Test

The Conference of Deans calls for a resolution to the interclassification problem, where different L.AS routes are approached differently by health faculties, leaving students unclear about the separation process. Veber suggests establishing a common test for all L.AS students on a biomedical discipline course to address this issue.

The Way Forward: A Single, Fair, and Transparent Admission Process

The deans’ criticism of the current health studies admission process highlights the need for urgent reform. By simplifying and standardizing the system, France can ensure a fairer and more transparent process, enabling students to pursue their dreams of becoming healthcare professionals. As the country grapples with the challenges of chronic diseases, an aging population, and the impact of artificial intelligence, it is crucial to get the admission process right, ensuring that future healthcare practitioners are equipped to tackle these complexities.

Keyword-rich tags: Health studies, entry reform, criticized, deans, PASS, L.AS, biomedical training, interclassification, admission process.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.