That’s how much two people were remanded in custody on Thursday afternoon for selling on.
It happened at a constitutional hearing at the Court in Aalborg, which was held behind closed doors.
These are two men, respectively. 31 and 28 years.
Both are charged with the transfer of 8.9 kg of cocaine in the period between January 6 and October 16, 2023.
They both deny that relationship, while they disagree about another relationship.
Here they are charged with possession of 132 grams of cocaine with a view to further transfer.
The 31-year-old says it was for his own consumption, while the 28-year-old refuses.
He is also charged with being in possession of 15 grams of cocaine with intent to transfer when he was arrested yesterday. He says it was for his own consumption.
He is also charged with passing on 137 grams of cocaine yesterday before the arrest. He also denies that relationship.
They have both been remanded in custody for four weeks. The eldest has accepted, but the youngest has appealed to the High Court for release.
With the eight kilos and 900 grams of cocaine, which the police put the two in connection with, it exceeds the threshold value for when it is assumed that it is for personal use. The Attorney General has set it at 25 grams. This is over 300 times as much of the dangerous substance.
Section 191 of the Criminal Code, subsection 1 criminalizes the transfer of drugs, which is punishable by imprisonment for up to 10 years. If it is a question of substances of a particularly dangerous nature, the penalty can increase to imprisonment for 16 years.
2024-10-10 13:23:00
#men #remanded #custody #wholesale #trade #hard #drugs
Analysis: Rising Concerns Over Custody Remands and Their Impact on the Justice System
Recent news articles have shed light on the growing issue of custody remands and their implications on the justice system. As a blog news writer, I will analyze these reports and provide an in-depth examination of the situation.
According to a report by the Law Gazette, a legal advocacy group has called on the government to reduce the record-high number of prisoners remanded into custody to tackle the prisons crisis [1]. This raises concerns about the efficiency and fairness of the justice system. With a large number of individuals being remanded in custody, it is essential to question whether these decisions are being made judiciously or if they are exacerbating the existing prison crisis.
A recent incident involving a suspect in a shooting attempt on a public figure highlights the severity of the issue. Ryan Routh, a 58-year-old suspect, was remanded in custody after being charged with firearms offenses [2]. While this case may warrant a custody remand, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of such decisions on the prison system and the individuals involved.
Furthermore, a report from Hong Kong raises questions about the use of custody remands in cases involving sensitive or politically charged issues. A Hong Kong man was remanded in custody under the Article 23 law for allegedly wearing seditious clothing in public [3]. This case sparks concerns about the potential for abuses of power and the erosion of civil liberties.
the recent reports on custody remands highlight the need for a comprehensive review of the justice system’s approach to these decisions. It is essential to balance the need for public safety with the rights and liberties of individuals, ensuring that custody remands are used judiciously and not exacerbate the prison crisis.
As a society, we must come together to address these concerns and work towards a more equitable and efficient justice system. By doing so, we can ensure that the rights of all individuals are protected, and the rule of law is upheld.
