In a significant revelation amidst the ongoing trial of Daniel Penny, a forensic pathologist from Manhattan disclosed crucial findings regarding the autopsy of Jordan Neely, who passed away following a fracas aboard a subway train in New York City. Dr. Cynthia Harris, serving at the City Medical Examiner’s Office, confirmed that the definitive cause of Neely’s death was asphyxiation, attributed specifically to compression of the neck, despite the presence of synthetic drugs in his system.
Dr. Harris provided an overview of the toxicology report, indicating that Neely had ingested substances identified broadly as “synthetic cannabinoids.” These drugs, she elaborated, belong to a relatively new class and are known for their heightened potency compared to traditional marijuana. “They fall under the category of stimulants – they rev the body up, akin to substances like cocaine,” she explained, highlighting the risks associated with such drugs.
Notably, Dr. Harris reported the absence of bone injuries to Neely’s chin, neck, or any midline structures, which often signal trauma in similar cases. However, her examination revealed numerous scrapes and bruises across his face, neck, torso, and arms, alongside petechiae in his eyes and damage to his spleen related to his sickle cell trait.
DANIEL PENNY TRIAL RESUMES AS FELLOW MARINE VET EXPLAINS CHOKEHOLD TRAINING ON WITNESS STAND
On November 15, 2024, Daniel Penny, a 26-year-old Marine veteran, appeared at the Manhattan Criminal Court, facing grave charges of second-degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide stemming from the May 1, 2023, incident that resulted in Neely’s death. Witnesses testified that Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man with a troubled past and history of mental illness, entered the train car shouting threats about going to prison for life and alarming fellow passengers.
In a tense moment during the trial, prosecutors reintroduced video footage capturing the critical incident, allowing Dr. Harris to comment on it as she described her observations. She noted that Neely was indeed communicating during the altercation, which indicated that he had “air moving through his vocal cords.” However, as the circumstances escalated, Dr. Harris described how Neely struggled to breathe, making hand gestures that she interpreted as pleas for assistance.
Assistant District Attorney Dafna Yoran pressed Dr. Harris on conflicting witness accounts claiming Neely did not exhibit signs of distress, such as gagging or gasping for breath. Dr. Harris reiterated, “Sometimes people make noises when they can’t breathe, and sometimes they don’t,” offering insight into the complexities of asphyxiation and unconsciousness.
Dr. Harris articulated a timeline for Neely’s demise, estimating that he lost consciousness approximately two minutes and nine seconds into the recorded incident. “At this point, he has lost consciousness, and what we see in terms of twitching represents brain injury,” she clarified, emphasizing the severe implications of prolonged asphyxia.
Penny’s defense claims he was acting to protect the passengers within the subway car. However, the prosecution aimed to draw attention to the racial dynamics at play, asserting that Neely’s status as a Black individual coming under attack in a predominantly white environment added layers of complexity to the situation.
Demonstrators present outside the courthouse showcased a Michael Jackson-style jacket, symbolizing Jordan Neely, who was once renowned for impersonating the pop icon. Even after Penny released Neely from the chokehold, Dr. Harris stated that the existence of a pulse was not abnormal following such traumatic events. “This is an asphyxial death… The brain dies first, deprived of oxygen,” she conveyed, underlining the physiological processes at work.
In court, Dr. Harris continued her testimony, having resumed from the previous session where Joseph Caballer, a Marine martial arts instructor, discussed the techniques behind chokeholds. He noted the goal of such maneuvers is often to incapacitate a perceived threat until they lose consciousness.
In the courtroom atmosphere, Dr. Harris differentiated between blood chokes and air chokes, detailing how a choke that impacts venous blood flow causes visible changes in complexion—specifically, a purple hue as blood pools within the veins. She instructed the Assistant District Attorney to pause the court’s viewing of the video, asserting that Neely’s purple face starkly contrasted with the coloration of his arms, evidencing the severity of the situation.
DANIEL PENNY THOUGHT HE WAS PROTECTING A DIVERSE SUBWAY CAR, BUT PROSECUTORS HIGHLIGHT RACIAL UNDERTONES
As proceedings unfold, the prosecution anticipates concluding their case following Dr. Harris’ testimony. Meanwhile, the defense team is preparing to present their first witness in the upcoming week. Testimony has already been given by Eric Gonzales, a man who participated in restraining Neely, who admitted to feeling a pulse when they finally released him and struck a deal for immunity in exchange for his account.
Penny faces a potential sentence of up to 15 years if convicted of the more severe manslaughter charge, alongside another charge of criminally negligent homicide, which further intensifies the stakes of this high-profile case.
What were the key autopsy findings regarding Jordan Neely’s cause of death as explained by Dr. Cynthia Harris?
**Interview with Dr. Cynthia Harris, Forensic Pathologist**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Harris. Your testimony during the trial of Daniel Penny has drawn significant attention. Can you elaborate on the autopsy findings of Jordan Neely, particularly the cause of death?
**Dr. Harris:** Thank you for having me. The autopsy confirmed that Jordan Neely died from asphyxiation due to compression of the neck. This means that the pressure on his neck ultimately prevented him from breathing effectively. While there were synthetic cannabinoids found in his system, which may have contributed to his mental state, the primary cause of his death was the physical restriction of airflow.
**Editor:** You mentioned the toxicology report indicated the presence of synthetic cannabinoids. Can you explain what that entails?
**Dr. Harris:** Yes, synthetic cannabinoids are a class of drugs that are often much more potent than traditional marijuana. They can act as stimulants, increasing heart rate and anxiety, which can exacerbate any underlying mental health issues a person may have. In Neely’s case, while those substances were present, they did not play a direct role in his death according to our findings.
**Editor:** During your examination, you noted the absence of bone injuries, but you did find bruises and scrapes. How do you interpret those findings in the context of the incident?
**Dr. Harris:** The lack of bone injuries to the neck or midline structures is significant because it can indicate the nature of the force applied. However, the bruising and scrapes suggest that there was physical altercation and struggle before he lost consciousness. This aligns with the video evidence of the event, where Neely was seen moving and making hand gestures, which I interpreted as distress signals.
**Editor:** There appears to be a debate about whether Neely showed signs of distress during the confrontation. Can you elaborate on your observations in this context?
**Dr. Harris:** Certainly. During the incident, Neely was vocal and exhibited movements that indicated he was trying to communicate. However, when one is asphyxiating, the body can react in complex ways. Sometimes, a person may not make obvious signs of gagging or gasping for breath, even while they are in distress. We must consider that asphyxiation can manifest differently in various individuals.
**Editor:** The trial has also drawn significant public attention, especially regarding the racial dynamics of the incident. What impact do you think this has on public perception and the legal proceedings?
**Dr. Harris:** The context of race and societal dynamics is incredibly important in this case. The racial aspects may influence how different communities perceive the actions taken by both Neely and Penny. As a forensic pathologist focused on the medical details, I emphasize the findings of the autopsy; however, I recognize that this incident resonates deeply within broader societal discussions regarding race, mental health, and public safety.
**Editor:** Thank you for your insights, Dr. Harris. Your professional perspective on this complex case is invaluable as the trial continues to unfold.
**Dr. Harris:** Thank you for having me. I hope my testimony sheds light on the medical aspects of this tragic incident.
