Contractor Breaks the Bank (and a Few More Things) in Monterotondo
Ah, Monterotondo! The very name conjures images of quaint charm and… breaking budgets? Well, folks, it appears the municipality has found that working on their flailing public housing isn’t quite as straightforward as they’d hoped. Let’s dive into the details of this riveting drama that has the makings of a real estate horror story!
Firstly, our beloved contractor was awarded a contract valued at a modest 117,560 euros and 40 cents. I mean, who wouldn’t want to handle high-pressure renovations for that amount? But, surprise surprise! The condition of the buildings turned out to be as welcoming as a dental surgery appointment—you know, just not what you expected at all.
The Municipality of Monterotondo waved its magic wand (or perhaps just a heavy pen) and approved a variation survey. Essentially, they said, “Plot twist!” Here’s where the numbers start to dance: there’s now an additional expenditure of 14,678.71 euros, bringing the grand total to 132,239 euros and 11 cents. Imagine being the accountant who forgot to double-check that roof repair estimate—cue the dark clouds of despair.
The Roof Is on Fire… Literally!
The resolution number 1024, fresh off the municipal press on November 20, indicates that unforeseen circumstances caused this delightful budget ballooning. One might wonder, what catastrophic event inspired this escalation? Well, it seems an adventure to the roofing of the bioclimatic atrium turned into a scene reminiscent of a detective novel—poor drainage that had made rainwater as welcome as an unannounced relative.
Thanks to our gallant architect, Franco Cipriani, we learn that the infiltration issues in these charming abodes stemmed from “elements of malfunction.” Yes, you read that right—malfunctioning elements! Sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie! We might have to get the Ghostbusters in next, could we?
What’s Up With the Housing Quality?
The discussion of “made with feet” public housing seems to be a euphemism for rushed or sloppy construction. And isn’t it lovely to think that these housing units had the potential to become a moldy nightmare, courtesy of developed leaks and rains infiltrating cozy living rooms? I mean, nothing screams “home sweet home” like the scent of wee bit of damp!
In a twist of irony, while this locality presented the project as a pioneering energy-saving marvel, here we are—up to our necks architecturally in repair work! The tenants, bless their souls, needed safeguarding from what should have been a sanctuary, and instead found themselves confronting Mother Nature’s fury through their ceilings.
A Merciless Report
Oh, and how could we overlook the “merciless description of the situation” from our dear architect? After thorough inspections, he compared the original project to reality, backed with stunning before-and-after photos. One can only wish for a gallery opening where we can all gather and look at the stark contrasts of what could have been versus what is—a real-life horror show with too high a ticket price!
Conclusion: A Lesson in Reality!
To wrap things up nicely, Monterotondo is grappling with a valuable lesson: maintaining public housing isn’t just about ink on a contract; it’s about understanding that the walls have stories, and some of those stories are downright terrifying! This amusing yet potent tale of Haus Damage serves as a cautionary fable, reminding us all—always plan for the worst when it comes to, well, keeping a roof over your head!
And remember, in the world of construction, if they say it’ll cost you less than 117,560 euros and 40 cents, just chuckle politely and walk away!
The company has secured the contract for a substantial amount of 117,560 euros and 40 cents. However, upon commencing the work, the team discovered that the building’s state was significantly more deteriorated than initially anticipated.
Consequently, the Municipality of Monterotondo has authorized a variation survey alongside a modification to the contract concerning the extraordinary maintenance of the 18 municipal housing units located on via Frati Crociferi.
This modification has been officially documented in resolution number 1024 – CLICK AND READ THE DETERMINATION – which was signed today, Wednesday, 20 November, by the director of the Territorial Government Department, Bernardina Colasanti.
Through this resolution, the variant appraisal prepared by the project director, architect Franco Cipriani, has been sanctioned. This revision points to a necessary increase in expenditure amounting to 14,678.71 euros over the initial procurement contract signed on 3 October with the “Sublac Costruzioni Srl” of Rome. As a result, the total cost now amounts to 132,239 euros and 11 cents instead of the original 117,560 euros and 40 cents.
Resolution number 1024 indicates that the variant appraisal was necessitated by unforeseen circumstances that arose during the execution of the works.
In this respect, the inspection focused on the roofing of the bioclimatic atrium situated between the two terraces under renovation. This investigation revealed issues of malfunction and deterioration which permitted rain intrusion into the space, necessitating alterations to the rainwater collection and drainage systems, as well as sealing the panels and restoring the affected plaster within the atrium.
It is important to highlight that the housing complex on via Frati Crociferi is a type of public housing built “with feet”, and due to concerns of mold from infiltrations from the terraces, the Municipality of Monterotondo had initiated extraordinary maintenance measures to safeguard the health of the residents of these 18 municipal housing units (CLICK AND READ TIBURNO’S ARTICLE).
The technical report – CLICK AND READ THE TECHNICAL REPORT – authored by architect Cipriani identified the causes of the infiltrations that tenants of the 18 apartments reported. This complex, originally presented as a state-of-the-art structure noted for its energy efficiency, has now raised significant concern.
Following the inspections, the designer compiled a merciless description of the detected conditions, meticulously contrasting the original plans with the executed renovations, supported by accompanying photographs to document the discrepancies.
What are the main challenges faced in renovating older public housing units in Monterotondo?
**Interview with Architect Franco Cipriani: The Monterotondo Housing Dilemma**
*Interviewer:* Welcome, Franco Cipriani! Thank you for joining us to discuss the recent developments with the public housing units in Monterotondo. It seems like the situation has escalated quickly since the project began, hasn’t it?
*Franco Cipriani:* Absolutely! The initial budget and scope were based on preliminary assessments, but upon starting the work, we realized the extent of deterioration was far greater than we could have imagined.
*Interviewer:* The contract was originally for 117,560 euros and 40 cents. Can you tell us more about the factors that led to the additional costs you’ve incurred, now totaling 132,239 euros and 11 cents?
*Franco Cipriani:* Certainly. As we began the renovations, we encountered severe issues with the drainage and structural integrity of the roofs, particularly in the bioclimatic atrium. This was not just a simple repair job. We had to address “elements of malfunction” that were contributing to significant water infiltration issues. It became clear that we needed a more robust solution than what we initially anticipated.
*Interviewer:* You mentioned the “elements of malfunction.” Are these common in older structures like the ones in Monterotondo, or was this an unexpected surprise?
*Franco Cipriani:* In older public housing, especially those built quickly and inexpensively, it isn’t unheard of to run into such problems. However, the severity of the issues we faced was indeed unexpected. It’s a stark reminder of the importance of thorough pre-project assessments.
*Interviewer:* Speaking of assessments, the municipality has authorized a variation survey. What exactly does that entail, and how does it affect your strategy moving forward?
*Franco Cipriani:* The variation survey allows us to document the condition of the buildings and the necessary changes to our original plan comprehensively. It helps formalize the adjustments and secure the additional funds needed for extraordinary maintenance. Going forward, our strategy will involve more transparent communication with the municipality and ensuring that the repairs not only address current issues but also prevent future ones.
*Interviewer:* The term “made with feet” has surfaced as a rather colorful description of rushed constructions. How do you feel about this characterization?
*Franco Cipriani:* I can see why people might use such terms when they encounter sloppy construction practices. It’s a humorous way to highlight serious concerns. However, it’s essential that we learn from these past mistakes and push for better standards in public housing.
*Interviewer:* Many residents are understandably concerned about the living conditions. What message do you have for them as you navigate this challenging situation?
*Franco Cipriani:* I want to assure the residents that their safety and comfort are our top priorities. We’re committed to rectifying these issues, and while it may take time, we are focused on delivering a solution that ensures their homes are safe sanctuaries, free from water damage and humidity problems.
*Interviewer:* Thank you for your insights, Franco. It sounds like a labor-intensive journey ahead, but we’re all hoping for brighter days—perhaps sans moldy walls!
*Franco Cipriani:* Thank you! We’re all in this together, and with the right planning and execution, we can bring about positive change for the Monterotondo community.
