After the Supreme Court annulled the NAB amendments, the cases against former President Asif Ali Zardari and 6 former Prime Ministers were reopened. The Supreme Court in the decision restored all the cases of politicians and said that all cases should be rescheduled in NAB courts and accountability courts.
A 3-member bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Atta Bandyal approved the petition of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan against the NAB amendments and declared null and void 9 out of 10 clauses of the NAB amendments, while Justice Mansoor Ali Shah disagreed. Note is also written.
In the brief judgment of the Supreme Court, it has been said that the rights of public interest have been affected by the NAB amendments, the first amendment of Section 10 and Section 14 of the NAB amendments has been declared null and void and all the cases that ended when the limit was less than 50 crores have been restored. have been done.
Also read this news: All the cases that ended below the limit of 50 crores were restored, Imran Khan’s request against the NAB amendments was approved
The Supreme Court in the decision has restored all cases of politicians and said that all cases should be rescheduled in NAB courts and accountability courts.
Cases closed against many politicians have been revived after the Supreme Court struck down the NAB amendments.
After the decision of the Supreme Court, the Tosha Khana reference against Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz Sharif and Yusuf Raza Gilani has been restored.
The LNG reference of former prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi was transferred from the accountability court and the rental power reference against former prime minister Raja Pervez Ashraf was also returned, which has now been reinstated.
Apart from this, the cases against former Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, former Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz and former Finance Minister Ishaq Dar will also be reopened.
#Closed #NAB #cases #politicians #including #prime #ministers #restored
**Interview with Legal Expert Ayesha Malik on Recent Supreme Court Ruling on NAB Amendments**
**Host:** Welcome to our show! Today, we have legal expert Ayesha Malik with us to discuss the recent Supreme Court ruling regarding the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) amendments. Ayesha, thank you for joining us.
**Ayesha Malik:** Thank you for having me!
**Host:** Let’s dive right in. The Supreme Court has restored the previous NAB laws and reopened cases against notable politicians, including former President Asif Ali Zardari and several former Prime Ministers. What is the significance of this ruling?
**Ayesha Malik:** This ruling is highly significant as it not only impacts the ongoing accountability processes but also reinstates a sense of legal scrutiny over the actions of former leaders. It sends a strong message regarding the accountability of public officials, which is a cornerstone of democracy.
**Host:** The court annulled nine out of ten clauses in the NAB amendments. Can you elaborate on what this means for the future of accountability in Pakistan?
**Ayesha Malik:** Certainly. By rejecting the majority of the amendments, the Supreme Court has upheld the original framework of NAB, which emphasizes holding public officials accountable. This means that mechanisms for investigating corruption and financial misconduct will remain robust, and ongoing cases will have the chance to proceed without the restrictions that the amendments imposed.
**Host:** There was some dissent within the bench, with Justice Mansoor Ali Shah disagreeing with the majority ruling. How does dissent within a judicial ruling affect public perception and future legal interpretations?
**Ayesha Malik:** Dissenting opinions are vital as they provide an alternative perspective and can be referenced in future cases. While this ruling reflects a majority viewpoint, the dissent indicates that there are legitimate concerns about the implications of such accountability measures. This can lead to discussions about reforms and potential changes in the law moving forward.
**Host:** how do you expect the political landscape to change following this ruling, particularly for the individuals whose cases have been reopened?
**Ayesha Malik:** The reopening of these cases will undoubtedly reignite political tensions. Those affected will likely mount a vigorous defense, and we may see intensified legal battles in the courts. Politically, it could challenge the positions of the individuals involved, affecting their parties and the broader electoral landscape as they navigate these legal challenges.
**Host:** Thank you, Ayesha, for providing such valuable insights on this important issue.
**Ayesha Malik:** Thank you for having me! It will be interesting to see how this unfolds.
**Host:** And thank you to our viewers for tuning in. Stay informed, and we will keep you updated on this evolving story.
