Agadir 24 | Agadir24
The Registry Authority announced the suspension of the previously announced protests, in addition to the boycott of court sessions, against the backdrop of the Ministry of Justice’s response to a group of demands related to reviewing the statute of the profession.
This step comes after a meeting was held today, Monday, October 7, between representatives of the Registry and the Ministry of Justice, which resulted in an agreement to amend the statute and respond to a number of demands that would strengthen the profession.
In this context, the Democratic Union of Justice revealed that Minister Abdel Latif Wehbe affirmed his absolute support for the outcomes of the sectoral dialogue and his constant endeavor to improve the financial and legal conditions of the Registry.
The union explained that it was informed of “the positive path of the project to amend the statute of the Registry Authority in order to achieve the conditions of motivation and immunization, after the involvement of the rest of the relevant sectors, with the support and guidance of the Prime Minister, in accelerating the pace of approval and inclusion in the government council.”
According to the same source, emphasis was also placed on “reconsidering the methodology of basic and continuous training and approving pre-training for employees who meet the conditions for accessing positions of responsibility, in a way that qualifies them in the future to learn it to the fullest extent.”
The union concluded that “the minister is open to all constructive proposals,” noting “the ministry’s commitment to involving the union in preparing regulatory texts, as well as pedagogical visions for basic and continuing training.”
It should be noted that the protest steps announced by the Registry Authority earlier led to major paralysis in the courts and the disruption of hearings for a long time, which aroused the dissatisfaction of the servientes whose interests were affected as a result.
#Clerks #suspend #protests #meeting #Justice #Ministry #officials
2024-10-08 11:48:33
Analysis: Understanding the Impact of the Suspension of Protests and Court Sessions Boycott
In a recent development, the Registry Authority has announced the suspension of previously announced protests, as well as a boycott of court sessions. This decision comes in response to the Ministry of Justice’s willingness to address a group of demands related to reviewing the statute of the profession.
A Look into the Code of Conduct and Ethics
In order to understand the context of this development, it’s essential to delve into the code of conduct and ethics that govern the behavior of those in the justice system. According to the Code of Conduct for United States Judges [[2]], federal judges are expected to adhere to specific ethical canons that guide their performance of official duties. Similarly, Department employees, including attorneys [[1]], must comply with rules on government ethics and professional conduct.
Authority and Investigative Power
The Ministry of Justice, in addressing the group of demands, may have demonstrated its authority and willingness to investigate and take action on matters related to the profession. This is aligning with the Authority of the Attorney General to investigate United States attorneys, marshals, trustees, clerks of court, and others [[3]].
The Significance of Suspension of Protests and Boycott
The suspension of protests and boycott of court sessions suggests that the Registry Authority may have deemed the Ministry of Justice’s response sufficient to address the concerns raised by the group. This could imply that the demands related to reviewing the statute of the profession are being taken seriously and that a resolution is being worked towards.
Conclusion
the suspension of protests and boycott of court sessions is a significant development that may mark a turning point in the negotiations between the Registry Authority and the Ministry of Justice. As the justice system continues to operate under the guidance of established codes of conduct and ethics, it will be essential to monitor the outcome of this situation and any subsequent developments that may arise.
Sources:
[1] https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-1-4000-standards-conduct
[2] https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges
[3] https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part2&edition=prelim
