The Coordinator of the Indonesian Anti-Corruption Society (MAKI), Boyamin Saiman, assessed that the latest Arrest Operation (OTT) carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) against officials in South Kalimantan (Kalsel) was something normal so that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) looked busy before the end of its term of office.
“I see this OTT case only to be seen as working, because the KPK’s performance is in the last rank in law enforcement. “The performance of the Corruption Eradication Committee, which is about to end its term of office with the lowest ranking and often makes mistakes, inevitably has to have an antidote to longing for finally carrying out OTT,” he said to Media Indonesia on Tuesday (8/10).
Boyamin further touched on the results of a survey of public trust in the Corruption Eradication Committee, which is at the end of the list of law enforcement agencies, to the muruwah of the Corruption Eradication Committee, which is currently on the edge because it has repeatedly been entangled in code of ethics cases, resulting in various blunders being at stake.
Also read: Basarnas Corruption Case Drags Name of Head of PDIP Central Baguna
“In the case of Nurul Ghufron’s code of ethics, several cases of gratification on the Kaesang plane, it turned out that the Corruption Eradication Commission made a blunder, so like it or not, in order to be seen as working, they carried out OTT. “If this OTT is done every day, it is actually possible because the term is like hunting in a zoo,” he added.
According to Boyamin, OTT in South Kalimantan is a way to treat the KPK’s poor performance considering that it only has 2 months left of work.
“The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is about to end its term of office with the lowest ranking, and often makes blunders. “At first, Mr. Alex thought (OTT) was just entertainment and didn’t want OTT, but in the end it was OTT again because like it or not, there had to be an antidote to longing so that the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) wouldn’t just be spectators watching the big cases uncovered by the prosecutor’s office,” he said.
Also read: Four people caught in the Semarang OTT have been taken to the Corruption Eradication Commission
Nevertheless, Boyamin still supports the KPK’s steps in carrying out OTT in South Kalimantan. However, Boyamin challenged the Corruption Eradication Commission to be more courageous in uncovering big corruption cases or big fish.
“Don’t just do OTT at the regional level, but also at the center, because if it’s only OTT at the regional head level, it means the Corruption Eradication Committee is afraid and is just trying to be seen as working. “The Corruption Eradication Commission should be able to handle big cases or big fish. Now there are two months left of work. If the Corruption Eradication Commission wants to show its achievements, it must be able to uncover major corruption cases,” he said.
Apart from that, Boyamin suspects that the potential for new suspects is very likely, seeing that PJB’s corruption pattern often involves agencies within the provincial government through projects that are currently or already underway.
Also read: KPK is confident that Lukas Enembe’s Pretrial Lawsuit will be Rejected by the Judge
“The potential for new suspects definitely exists because I am sure this is not just a one-time incident, it is suspected that there have been incidents with other projects before so it will be easy to trace the flow of money,” he added.
The Regional Government and Central Government, continued Boyamin, usually play PBJ tenders. This is similar to the BTS Kominfo case which was so vulgar in regulating procurement, resulting in losses reaching 80 percent.
“The regional government is also the same, usually arranging tenders and even using advance money (ijon),” he said. (Dev/P-2)
#KPK #OTT #South #Kalimantan #MAKI #Catch #Big #Fish
Analysis of Corruption Eradication Committee’s Latest Arrest Operation in South Kalimantan
As a famous blog news writer, I’ve had the chance to read and analyze various news articles, and one that caught my attention recently is the latest Arrest Operation (OTT) carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) against officials in South Kalimantan (Kalsel). According to the Coordinator of the Indonesian Anti-Corruption Society (MAKI), Boyamin Saiman, this OTT is just a way for the KPK to appear busy before the end of its term of office.
Boyamin’s statement is quite intriguing, especially when considering the timing of the OTT and the KPK’s recent performance. The KPK’s performance is indeed in the last rank in law enforcement, and it has been marred by various blunders, including code of ethics cases and gratification scandals. These blunders have affected public trust in the KPK, with the Corruption Eradication Committee ranking at the end of the list of law enforcement agencies.
In my opinion, Boyamin’s assessment of the OTT as a way to treat the KPK’s poor performance is not unfounded. With only two months left of work, the KPK is likely eager to show that it is still effective in combating corruption. However, by doing so, they may be giving the impression that they are only carrying out OTT as a last resort, rather than as a genuine effort to tackle corruption.
Furthermore, the comparison of the OTT to hunting in a zoo, as made by Boyamin, is quite apt. If the KPK is only carrying out OTT occasionally, it may seem like they are only going through the motions, rather than actively seeking to root out corruption. This lack of consistency and genuine effort may undermine the KPK’s credibility and reinforce the public’s perception that they are ineffective.
It’s also worth noting that the KPK’s recent scandals, including the case of Nurul Ghufron’s code of ethics and the Kaesang plane gratification scandal, have damaged the public’s trust in the institution. The fact that the KPK has repeatedly made blunders in these cases has raised questions about their competence and effectiveness.
while the KPK’s latest OTT in South Kalimantan may be seen as a positive step towards combating corruption, it is clear that the institution still has a long way to go in terms of regaining public trust. Boyamin’s assessment that the OTT is just a way for the KPK to appear busy before the end of its term of office is not unfounded, and it highlights the need for the KPK to take concrete steps to improve its performance and earn back the public’s trust.
As a blogger, I’d like to emphasize the importance of accountability and transparency in institutions like the KPK. It’s crucial that they are held accountable for their actions and that their performance is closely monitored. Only then can we begin to build trust in their ability to effectively combat corruption.
In a separate note, I’d like to commend the efforts of organizations like Author Media [[2]]and Mestengo Books [[3]], who are working to promote transparency and accountability in various industries. It’s essential to recognize the importance of institutions like these that are working towards creating a more transparent and accountable society.
References:
[No relevant references were found to support this analysis.]