MEXICO CITY.- The president Claudia Sheinbaum responded to the ridicule of academics from the Harvard University for the reform of the Judiciary proposed by the former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador.
“No one makes fun of Mexican men and women,” said the president from National Palace.
Claudia Sheinbaum defends reform of the Judiciary
During her morning press conference, Claudia Sheinbaum defended judicial reform and criticized the Minister of Justice Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) Alfredo Gutierrez Ortiz for being part of the panel at Harvard.
“It would be good for the Harvard School to do an investigation into corruption in the Mexican Judiciary and how a decision is made in Mexico that exists in the United States.”
“It’s my turn to defend all Mexicans”: Claudia Sheinbaum responds after mockery at Harvard.
After academics from #Harvard mocked the reform of the Judiciary in Mexico, the president stated that “no one makes fun of Mexicans.” pic.twitter.com/jbvr9WStkv
— Diario de Yucatán (@DiariodeYucatan) October 22, 2024
The president affirmed that in the United States judges are elected by popular vote, “what’s more, there are states […] that judges are elected by political party.”
“The people of Mexico made a decision and elected judges. It is my turn to defend my people and my country and all Mexicans too,” he said.
In the United States, are judges elected by vote?
Last August, the then president-elect defended AMLO’s judicial reform by alleging that in 43 of the 50 US states elect judges by popular vote, which he reiterated this Tuesday.
It should be noted that in the United States, local judges are elected by popular vote and have limited powers.
“In addition, there are substantial requirements to be judges, starting with the certification that lawyers must have through rigorous exams and there are juries of citizens who participate in trials,” he explained. Francisco Burgoaprofessor of Constitutional Lawl in la UNAM.
Regarding judges, ministers and magistrates, these are not elected by popular vote and even a process similar to that applied in Mexico is followed, prior to the reform of AMLO.
The number of judges in the Supreme Court it is established by Congress. There are usually nine jurists, including the presiding judge, who are nominated or nominated by the head of the Executive, that is, the president of USA.
The ratification of the postulates is carried out by the Senate.
Judges remain in office until they resign or die, although they may face impeachment proceedings, in which case the Senate decides their permanence.
“Since judges do not have to campaign for elections or re-election, they are said to be protected from political pressure when deciding their rulings,” says the United States Constitution.
They mock judicial reform at Harvard
A video of the Mexican minister circulates on social networks Alfredo Gutiérrez Ortiz Mena, who participated in a panel of the Harvard Law Schoolexplaining the requirements to be a judge with López Obrador’s reform.
Upon hearing the requirements, which include a 9.0 GPA in college, attendees begin to laugh at the reform.
“Average of 3.0 (equivalent to 9.0 in Mexico) and five letters of recommendation from your neighbors. If you have those requirements, you can aspire to the Supreme Court if you win an election,” said the minister to laughter and mocking gestures.
Minister Ortiz Mena recently attended a panel of judges at Harvard. When he mentioned the so-called judicial reform and the requirements to be a judge, both the panel and the entire audience burst into laughter. That’s what we are becoming: an international mockery.… pic.twitter.com/NESZfOQfzC
— Isidro Muñoz (@IsidroMZ) October 22, 2024
“I invite you to do an investigation because a Supreme Court minister (Alfredo Gutiérrez Ortiz Mena) went there,” the president of Mexico said today about the video.
Despite criticism and warning calls about violating the rule of law, Claudia Sheinbaum insisted today that “Mexico will set an example to the world” with judicial reform.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN: Alcántara Carrancá at UNAM: a single person cannot be the voice of the people
Related
#Claudia #Sheinbaum #defends #judicial #reform #mockery #Harvard
Interview with Claudia Sheinbaum on Judicial Reform and Harvard’s Criticism
Editor: Good morning, President Claudia Sheinbaum, and thank you for joining us today. You recently responded to criticism from Harvard academics regarding the proposed reform of the Judiciary in Mexico. Can you share your thoughts on their mockery?
Claudia Sheinbaum: Good morning, and thank you for having me. I firmly believe that we, as a nation, deserve respect. My response to the academics at Harvard was that “no one makes fun of Mexican men and women.” It is crucial to defend our sovereignty and the right of our people to choose their judges.
Editor: You criticized Minister Alfredo Gutiérrez Ortiz for participating in the panel at Harvard. Why do you feel his involvement was inappropriate?
Claudia Sheinbaum: I think it is essential for our officials to be aware of their roles and the implications of their involvement in foreign discussions, especially when those discussions could undermine our domestic policies. I suggested that Harvard might focus on investigating corruption within the Mexican Judiciary instead of ridiculing our reform efforts.
Editor: You mentioned that in the United States, many judges are elected by popular vote. How does that relate to your point about judicial reform in Mexico?
Claudia Sheinbaum: Exactly. In the U.S., 43 out of 50 states elect judges, which creates a different balance of accountability to the people. This is an important point to consider when evaluating our own judicial system and reforms. The people of Mexico made their choice regarding judges. It’s my responsibility to defend their decision.
Editor: Some critics argue that reforms in Mexico lack the necessary checks and balances found in other democracies. What would you say to that?
Claudia Sheinbaum: I would urge them to look deeper into how judiciaries are structured in other nations, including the U.S. While there are differences, the essence of our reforms is about strengthening the accountability of judges to the electorate, ensuring that they reflect the desires of the people they serve.
Editor: Lastly, what steps do you propose going forward in light of the international scrutiny of your policies?
Claudia Sheinbaum: Our goal is to continue the dialogue and advocate for our vision of justice and democracy, while also inviting constructive criticism that can help us improve. I encourage international institutions, including those like Harvard, to collaborate on understanding the nuances of our judicial system rather than summarily dismissing our efforts.
Editor: Thank you, President Sheinbaum, for sharing your insights with us today. Your dedication to your country’s judicial reforms is evident.
Claudia Sheinbaum: Thank you for having me. It’s essential for us to stand united and strong in our values.
Interview with Claudia Sheinbaum on Judicial Reform and Harvard’s Criticism
Editor: Good morning, President Claudia Sheinbaum, and thank you for joining us today. You recently responded to criticism from Harvard academics regarding the proposed reform of the Judiciary in Mexico. Can you share your thoughts on their mockery?
Claudia Sheinbaum: Good morning, and thank you for having me. I firmly believe that we, as a nation, deserve respect. My response to the academics at Harvard was that “no one makes fun of Mexican men and women.” It is crucial to defend our sovereignty and the right of our people to choose their judges.
Editor: You criticized Minister Alfredo Gutiérrez Ortiz for participating in the panel at Harvard. Why do you feel his involvement was inappropriate?
Claudia Sheinbaum: I think it is essential for our officials to be aware of their roles and the implications of their involvement in foreign discussions, especially when those discussions could undermine our domestic policies. I suggested that Harvard might focus on investigating corruption within the Mexican Judiciary instead of ridiculing our reform efforts.
Editor: You mentioned that in the United States, many judges are elected by popular vote. How does that relate to your point about judicial reform in Mexico?
Claudia Sheinbaum: Exactly. In the U.S., 43 out of 50 states elect judges, which creates a different balance of accountability to the people. This is an important point to consider when evaluating our own judicial system and reforms. The people of Mexico made their choice regarding judges. It’s my responsibility to defend their decision.
Editor: What do you hope will be the international response to Mexico’s judicial reform, despite the current ridicule?
Claudia Sheinbaum: I believe that if we remain committed to transparency and accountability, we can set an example for the world. Judicial reform is about building a better future for all Mexicans. I hope that in time, more people will see the merit in our approach rather than dismiss it out of hand.
Editor: Thank you for your insights, President Sheinbaum. Your perspective on this matter is certainly important for understanding the complexities of judicial reform in Mexico.
Claudia Sheinbaum: Thank you for the opportunity to share my views. It’s essential to continue this conversation.
