2024-09-08 03:25:00
Javier Mire continues to stick to the main pillar of his government: lowering inflation. He knows that as long as prices continue to fall He is fulfilling the golden terms of his electoral contract. Everything else may be important, but it’s secondary.
Javier Milei the most interventionist, Cristina Fernández the most liberal” loading=”lazy”/>
It’s not even possible to give the anchor a more generic name. For example, the economy is key to Milei’s daily legitimation among citizens. Because that adds other concepts: economic activity, employment levels, debt maturities, and a dozen other variables by which one can judge a government’s performance. Milai was simply pointing out with extreme clarity the rate of inflation and, ultimately, the indirect indicator most sensitive to Argentinian custom: the value of the dollar.
As inflation falls, The ruling party retains its greatest political capital: social patience to withstand the pain of fiscal adjustment. That patience showed more long-term encouragement than Milley’s opponents expected. Everything currently seems to indicate that it will stay with the government until next year. This is the year where the hopeful and the impatient will measure their strength on the voting stage. The political world as a whole has begun to realize that disputes must be organized around economic axes.
With his penchant for public insults and some specific examples inconsistent with the health of the institution, the president has provided several vulnerable flanks for attacks on his opponents. But the public interest remains centered on inflation.
The information about the barricades that Javier Mire and Cristina Kirchner exchanged on social networks was rubbish: at the heart of the discussion was the economic plan. There were two very clear statements: Milei showed the success of the anti-inflation plan and Cristina pointed out that the plan will not be able to sustain itself Because in his opinion the plan was conceptually wrong and almost destined to fail.
Three signs of the new political era
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
The exchange between Milley and Cristina made it clear that with the victory of the current president, a new political era had begun. The first and most obvious is Political decorum in Argentina no longer exists. Maybe one day, with hard work, it can be restored. But at the same time, the reality is that the socially sanctioned language of politics defaults to bickering and suburbia.
second relevant data The crossover between Milley and Cristina is what the former president acknowledges is a paradigm shift in the discussion of economic thought. Cristina chose to accuse Milley of allegedly being at odds with liberal tenets. The former president has taken an infamous spin as she attempts to position herself within the new coordinates of the current climate (it’s not the first stunt she’s done: She recently said she’d never considered herself a feminist).
Indeed, Cristina Kirchner began her critique of Milley’s economy by reminding the liberal president that he controls and sets three of the economy’s four basic prices: the dollar, interest rates, and wage levels. The upper limit of parity is reached. Only prices for goods and services are published. For Cristina, the anti-inflation plan is inconsistent because it is creating a “lethal combination” of recession and unpaid debt. Do you think this combination will explode before the next election? As you might believe, lawmakers in Congress are working on this.
The third telling sign of a new era of climate is Cristina’s voice teaching an economic theory class is barely audible because her experience on the ground under the previous administration was disastrous. Everything he proposed to do was likely to be carried out, and he saved a bankrupt country. The new paradigm of social listening is immune to master-level treatises and is good at remembering the actual failures of the political class.
In that field, Milley has a considerable advantage because he promised to lower inflation and is delivering on that goal. His opponents are experts in confrontation. What did they say? “It’s trying to lower inflation: but the recession is deep; contractors have to be paid; but the exchange rate is dangerously delayed; but foreign debt repayments are at risk. Society doesn’t seem to notice the “but.” Perhaps it’s because it looked into the abyss of hyperinflation with the previous administration, and the reflections of panic remain.
The emergence of Cristina’s economic axis as the centerpiece of future electoral battles is no different from other political forces. Since the Basic Law was enacted, opposition groups in Parliament have only agreed to criticize the government’s anti-inflation programs and the effectiveness of fiscal adjustments.
The only horizontal consensus was Milley’s veto of the Retirement Mobility Act, and another similar attempt is imminent, but due to the impact of university realignment, This issue triggered the first large-scale social mobilization against the current government. Despite their nuances, within these alliances non-Kishnerist Peronism, radicalism, and even aspects of Macriism also sought to regain their political clarity.
The North has emerged in an election year. Milley hopes to discuss inflation there. His opponents want to discuss economic issues. This urgent reduction in political debate sometimes excludes very relevant topics because of its institutional impact, such as the Millais decision to restrict citizens’ rights to information.
Indeed, there is a generally unfavorable atmosphere surrounding these debates. A global wave of intolerance has manifested itself in censorship of social networks in Brazil, opposition to an independent judiciary in Mexico, and prompted dark warnings about free speech even in the United States. ‘s top editors new york times In a note posted on its competitor’s page washington post. This is also the climate of the new era.
1725765948
#Inflation #economy #Politics #creates #climate
Javier Milei wife
Javier Milei: The Anti-Inflation President of Argentina
In the midst of Argentina’s economic turmoil, Javier Milei has emerged as a beacon of hope for the country’s citizens. As the president, Milei has made it his top priority to lower inflation, a promise he has been delivering on thus far. This commitment to tackling inflation has become the cornerstone of his government’s legitimacy and the key to his popularity among the Argentine people.
According to [a href=”https://www.france24.com/fr/tag/javier-milei/”][1], Milei’s focus on inflation has led to a decrease in prices, which has, in turn, boosted his political capital. As long as inflation continues to fall, Milei’s government is seen as fulfilling its electoral contract, and the ruling party retains its greatest political capital: social patience to withstand the pain of fiscal adjustment.
The president’s detractors, on the other hand, have been attempting to attack him on other fronts, such as his penchant for public insults and inconsistencies in his governance. However, the public interest remains centered on inflation, and Milei’s opponents have been unable to shift the focus away from this critical issue.
The exchange between Milei and Cristina Kirchner, the former president, has highlighted the paradigm shift in the discussion of economic thought. Kirchner accused Milei of being at odds with liberal tenets, while Milei has been delivering on his promise to lower inflation. This debate has made it clear that the new political era in Argentina is centered around economic axes, and parties must organize their disputes accordingly.
In addition to the shift in economic thought, the political landscape in Argentina has undergone significant changes. Political decorum has given way to bickering and suburbia, and the socially sanctioned language of politics has defaulted to insults and personal attacks. Furthermore, the crossover between Milei and Kirchner has shown that even former presidents are willing to adapt to the new coordinates of the current climate.
Kirchner’s critique of Milei’s economy has also highlighted the inconsistencies in the anti-inflation plan. According to [a href=”https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/dossier/en-argentine-le-peril-milei”][2], Kirchner has pointed out that the plan is creating a “lethal combination” of recession and unpaid debt, which could explode before the next election.
Despite these criticisms, Milei has a considerable advantage due to his promise to lower inflation and his delivery on that goal. His opponents, on the other hand, are experts in confrontation, but their messages are being drowned out by the public’s focus on inflation. As the election year approaches, Milei hopes to discuss inflation, while his opponents want to discuss economic issues more broadly.
The emergence of Cristina’s economic axis as
**Javier Milei’s Quest to Tame Argentina’s Inflation and the New Political Era**
Title: Javier Milei’s Quest to Tame Argentina’s Inflation and the New Political Era
As the Argentine economy continues to navigate the challenges of high inflation, President Javier Milei remains steadfast in his commitment to reducing prices and fulfilling the golden terms of his electoral contract. According to recent reports, Milei has been dialing back his shock therapy program to maintain popular support amidst Argentina’s bleak economic reality [1].
The economy is at the heart of Milei’s daily legitimation among citizens, and his focus on reducing inflation has been a key factor in the ruling party’s ability to retain social patience and withstand the pain of fiscal adjustment. With inflation rates still high, Milei’s government has made significant progress in taming the beast, and his anti-inflation plan has been hailed as a success [2]. As inflation falls, the ruling party’s greatest political capital is retained, and Milei’s opponents have been left struggling to find their footing.
The exchange between Milei and Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, the former president, has highlighted the shift in the discussion of economic thought and the new political era that has begun in Argentina. Cristina’s critique of Milei’s economy has focused on the plan’s alleged inconsistencies and the potential for a “lethal combination” of recession and unpaid debt [3]. However, Milei’s plan has been successful in reducing inflation, and his commitment to liberal tenets has positioned him as a strong leader in the eyes of the Argentine people.
The new political era in Argentina is marked by three significant signs:
- Political decorum no longer exists: The exchange between Milei and Cristina has shown that political decorum in Argentina is a thing of the past. The language of politics has defaulted to bickering and suburbia, and it may take hard work to restore it.
- Paradigm shift in economic thought: The crossover between Milei and Cristina has highlighted a paradigm shift in the discussion of economic thought. Cristina’s attempts to position herself within the new coordinates of the current climate have led her to accuse Milei of allegedly being at odds with liberal tenets.
- A new era of climate: Cristina’s voice on economic theory has been barely audible, and her experience on the ground under the previous government has been questioned. This has led to a new era of climate, where the political world has begun to realize that disputes must be organized around economic axes.
Javier Milei’s commitment to reducing inflation has been a key factor in the ruling party’s success, and his anti-inflation plan has positioned him as a strong leader in the eyes of the Argentine people. The new
