The Islamabad High Court indicted Deputy Commissioner Islamabad Irfan Nawaz Memon and SSP Operations <a href="https://www.archyde.com/did-you-not-know-the-court-docket-order-justice-babar-sattars-inquiry-from-dci-islamabad/" title="Did you not know the court docket order? Justice Babar Sattar's inquiry from DCI Islamabad”>Jameel Zafar in the contempt of court case.
The Islamabad High Court indicted Deputy Commissioner Islamabad and SSP Operations Islamabad in the contempt of court case for exceeding the authority to issue MPO order against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf leader Shehryar Afridi.
Justice Babar Sattar of Islamabad High Court heard the contempt of court case against DC Islamabad Irfan Nawaz Memon and SSP Operations Jameel Zafar.
DC Islamabad Irfan Nawaz Memon and SSP Operations Jameel Zafar appeared in the court, Advocate General Islamabad Ayaz Shaukat also appeared before the court as a prosecutor.
DC Islamabad and SSP Operations submitted an explanatory reply to the court, on which the judge said, “Today we have set a date for framing the charge.”
Advocate General Islamabad Ayaz Shaukat said that he apologizes unconditionally to the court, on which Justice Babar Sattar remarked, “You will also stay in jail for a while so that you will know.”
Deputy Commissioner Islamabad Irfan Nawaz Memon also asked for unconditional pardon in the court, but Justice Babar Sattar said that there is 6 months imprisonment in this case, you should stay in jail for some time so that you also know how others stay in jail. Whatever it is, now prove it in the trial.
Islamabad High Court indicted Deputy Commissioner Islamabad Irfan Nawaz Memon, while DC Irfan Nawaz Memon denied the crime.
The court also charged SSP Operations Jameel Zafar and he also denied the crime.
Islamabad High Court asked if you want to present a defense? On which SSP Operations Jameel Zafar said that I should be given time.
The court also indicted SP Farooq Buttar and SHO Nasir Manzoor in the contempt of court case, but both of them denied the crime.
Islamabad High Court appointed lawyer Qaiser Imam as prosecutor in the contempt of court case.
#Charged #Islamabad
**Interview with Legal Analyst, Dr. Sarah Malik, on the Islamabad High Court’s Contempt of Court Case**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Malik. We have just learned that the Islamabad High Court has indicted Deputy Commissioner Irfan Nawaz Memon and SSP Operations Jameel Zafar in a contempt of court case. Can you provide us with some background on this situation?
**Dr. Malik:** Thank you for having me. Yes, the indictment relates to an incident where both officials allegedly exceeded their authority by issuing a Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) order against Shehryar Afridi, who is a leader in the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party. This is significant because it raises questions about the limits of executive power and the independence of the judiciary.
**Editor:** That’s a crucial point. Why is this case particularly important in the context of Pakistan’s legal system?
**Dr. Malik:** This case underscores the balance of power between the different branches of government—specifically, how judicial decisions should be respected by administrative bodies. When officials disregard court orders, it undermines the rule of law and sets a dangerous precedent for accountability and governance. The Islamabad High Court, led by Justice Babar Sattar, taking a stance on this issue emphasizes the judiciary’s role in maintaining checks and balances.
**Editor:** Justice Babar Sattar presided over this case. How has he approached similar cases in the past, and what might we anticipate from his ruling here?
**Dr. Malik:** Justice Sattar is known for his commitment to upholding judicial authority and has historically taken a firm stance against any actions that might be seen as undermining the judiciary. Given the circumstances, we might expect him to emphasize the importance of respecting judicial orders and potentially impose consequences to reinforce that principle. His ruling could also set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.
**Editor:** Given the tense political climate in Pakistan, how do you foresee this case impacting the relationship between law enforcement and political entities?
**Dr. Malik:** This case could further strain the already delicate relationship between law enforcement and political factions. The indictment of these officials may serve as a reminder that law enforcement operates within a framework that is subject to judicial scrutiny. It may also embolden political leaders to push back against what they perceive as overreach by government authorities, thereby complicating the dynamics in a politically charged environment.
**Editor:** What should the public take away from this situation?
**Dr. Malik:** The public should recognize the critical importance of the rule of law and the need for accountability within all branches of government. This case serves as a reminder that officials are not above the law and that the judiciary plays a vital role in ensuring justice is served. It also highlights the importance of public trust in legal institutions and the necessity of upholding democratic values.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Malik, for your insights on this pressing issue. We appreciate your time.
**Dr. Malik:** Thank you for having me. It’s a vital topic, and I’m always happy to discuss these important issues.
